activitypub should have defined a `Reply` activity and the `replies` collection should have contained these activities
Profile
npub1t5c9...ppw4
npub1t5c9...ppw4
I must not consume brainrot. Brainrot is the mind-killer. Brainrot is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face the brainrot. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the brainrot has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.
linkedin moment


fedi meta
i'm so sick to my stomach, i found out that someone is scraping / indexing posts from across fedi. i do not consent to this. can we get this shut down somehow???? 

Mastodon hosted on mastodon.social
Mastodon
The original server operated by the Mastodon gGmbH non-profit
federation is just one way to achieve some form of decentralization... but only on one axis. the axis of "service provider choice". what is needed alongside this is a great "unbundling" of services.
in the usa, if you want to sign up for just internet, companies often (more often in the past) force you to bundle in phone and tv service as well. we can think of one of fedi's current problems as the bundling of several services into a single provider -- identity, data, communication.
trying to get changes adopted by mastodon at a software or protocol level reminds me of the general frustrations of electoral politics. it's only slightly less ineffectual
question mainly to proponents of quote posts, but anyone can respond:
what would you say is the semantic relationship between a “quote post” and “the post being quoted”?
Are there any semantics at all, or is it a generic link/reference? What’s the difference between a “quote” and a “link preview”?
By semantic, I mean “meaning”. What does it mean to “quote” something?
If “quote posts” never existed, how would you design an equivalent?
boosts welcome, i’m trying to get a wide range of answers
the web was not made to be federated imo because the web is not a messaging platform, it's a publishing platform. in messaging, you federate between systems; in publishing, you *syndicate* to other sites. there is a difference, and the difference matters.
i want to Kill


idk where to really put this (might turn into a blog post later or something). it's what you might call a "hot take", certainly a heterodox one to some parts of the broader #fediverse community. this is in response to recent discussion on "what do you want to see from AP/AS2 specs" (in context of wg rechartering) mostly devolving into people complaining about JSON-LD and extensibility, some even about namespacing in general (there was a suggestion to use UUID vocab terms. i'm not joking)
1/?