TheDarrenator

I just asked Grok: "If I invested $1000 five years ago in #monero and $1000 in bitcoin, what would each be worth today?" Its answer, in part, was: Current approximate values of your $1,000 investments: Bitcoin investment: 0.02622 BTC × ~$64,000 (midpoint estimate) ≈ $1,678. Monero investment: 6.452 XMR × ~$320 (midpoint estimate) ≈ $2,065.

I like Candace, but... Yeah, she's getting to be a little coo-coo for Cocoa Puffs. She should focus on making her husband sandwiches and being a good wife and mother.

"Obedience" in the context of the Church is good -- unless your superior is a gay pervert who's bent on subverting the teachings and mission of the Church, and even subtly tries to lead you down a path contrary to what the Church has traditionally stood for.

If Bitcoin does not promise to skyrocket in price -- and instead stabilizes long term -- what advantage can it have over #Monero? The beauty and advantage of XMR is that no matter its price in relation to fiat, it works as private, fungible, digital cash. That's its one job. That's what it does well. Any fiat price gains it has is a bonus, not its promise. In the end, we value "gains" in wealth less than the gain of freedom and #privacy.

There is no such thing as "gay sex." Sex is not merely stimulation and orgasm, but rather two people joining their reproductive organs in a way that completes the reproductive system. Other systems (circulatory, nervous, endocrine, respiratory, etc.) are fully contained and function according to their purpose within each body. But the reproductive system is unique in that it requires two bodies in order to do what it's ultimately ordered to do. Joining part of the reproductive system to one end of the digestive system, for example, is not sex. It's fake sex, and it's a significant health risk from a medical perspective.

I liked the look of the old Netscape Messenger (email). I liked AOL IM. I was even somewhat OK with Yahoo! Messenger. I liked online forums and message boards. I miss some of the old Internet.

Listening now to Tucker's interview with Peter Schiff. Schiff is anti-Bitcoin because (for one) he says the reason everyone buys it is they think they will get rich, though it doesn't have inherent value. Tucker reminds him of crypto's original intent -- to be a permissionless private digital currency that circumvents third-party intermediaries. There is truth in both statements. We have to evaluate ourselves, our motives, our goals and purposes -- and ask #WWJD. #Bitcoin #Monero

The streets of Minneapolis are infested with demons.

Only Jesus. (Blessed be his holy name.)

Question for Protestants: If a Protestant pastor criticizes "revolving-door salvation," do you take that to mean he believes in "once saved, always saved"? Not sure what he means.