Was The CIA Misleading Witkoff & Kushner On Key Intel About Hamas During Critical Phase Of Peace-Talks Was The CIA Misleading Witkoff & Kushner On Key Intel About Hamas During Critical Phase Of Peace-Talks A fascinating hour-long interview with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner as they outline the backstory to the Israel-Hamas peace agreement in Gaza. During a segment (prompted below) Witkoff and Kushner are outlining the step-by-step process as they engaged the leaders of Qatar, Turkey and Egypt.  Witkoff reveals how the CIA was briefing them both, multiple times a day, and the briefing itself was exactly the opposite of what Emir of Qatar and Presidents of Turkey and Egypt were telling them.  image The CIA intelligence was the exact opposite of reality.   WATCH: What they are describing is EXACTLY why we outlined how ‘outside govt’ emissaries were/are vitally necessary to work around the control agenda of the U.S. Intelligence Community.  This small example is stunning in magnitude when considered around the importance of the moment. On a positive note, with Witkoff making this stunning public statement, we can now add a major datapoint to President Trump’s reference of NOT TRUSTING the CIA.  Combined with the previous assertions of Marco Rubio and Tulsi Gabbard on essentially the same level of outlook, this example of the CIA getting it wrong (misleading the administration) has long-range ramifications beyond the Hamas example. With this backdrop for reference, surely now we can have an optimistic sense that President Trump doesn’t trust the CIA intelligence on the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Mon, 10/20/2025 - 10:20
White House's Hassett Says Shutdown Could End This Week, Threatens "Stronger Measures" If Democrats Balk White House's Hassett Says Shutdown Could End This Week, Threatens "Stronger Measures" If Democrats Balk With the government shutdown in its third week, White House's top economic advisor Kevin Hassett said on Monday that the government shutdown is "likely to end sometime this week," and that if it does not, the Trump administration may impose "stronger measures" to try and force Democrats to cooperate. image Hassett told CNBC that he's heard from the Senate that Democrats thought it would be "bad optics" to vote to reopen the government before this weekend's nationwide "No Kings" protest. "Now there’s a shot that this week, things will come together, and very quickly," he said. "The moderate Democrats will move forward and get us an open government, at which point we could negotiate whatever policies they want to negotiate with regular order." "I think the Schumer shutdown is likely to end sometime this week," he said, referring to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), who Republicans have blamed for letting the government shut down. If it doesn't reopen, "I think that the White House is going to have to look very closely, along with [White House budget chief Russell] Vought, at stronger measures that we could take to bring them to the table," Hassett continued - suggesting that Democrats are simply looking for a politically opportune time to fold.  Watch: HASSETT: There's cracks in the Schumer armor. I think the Schumer Shutdown is likely to end sometime this week. But I can tell you that if it doesn't... the White House is gonna have to look very closely... at stronger measures that we can take to bring them to the table. — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) Hassett's comments added to the market's Monday morning momentum, and sent into a frenzy as to when the shutdown will end.  image Hassett's comments aside, the shutdown is currently in day 20 - with no obvious end in sight.  The top issue is Affordable Care Act subsidies - which Democrats are demanding an extension of a Biden-era pandemic ACA expansion set to expire at the end of the year - arguing that failing to do so would increase healthcare costs for families.  That said, maintaining the tax credit carries a big price tag - as permanently expanding the most generous benefits would increase the deficit by $350 billion from 2026 - 2035, according to the Congressional Budget Office.  Lawmakers don't have much time, however, as around a dozen states have published ACA heal insurance prices for 2026 which show many premiums skyrocketing unless Congress extends. By next week, dozens of other states will reveal pricing for next year. Mon, 10/20/2025 - 09:55
Judge Who Approved Mar-a-Lago Raid Once Shared Office With Jeffrey Epstein Judge Who Approved Mar-a-Lago Raid Once Shared Office With Jeffrey Epstein (emphasis ours), U.S. Judge Bruce Reinhart, who issued the warrant for the FBI’s raid on President Donald Trump’s , according to newly revealed records. image Some of Judge Reinhart’s links to Epstein have long been known. Reinhart worked for the U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Florida while that branch was prosecuting Epstein for sex crimes in the mid-2000s, and he left that office to work for Epstein in January 2008—more than six months before the Justice Department’s plea deal with Epstein was finalized. But that’s not all. On Friday, the House Oversight Committee released a of its interview with former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida Alex Acosta, who signed off on the Epstein plea deal. That transcript reveals that Judge Reinhart not only worked as an attorney for Epstein; he shared office with the deceased sex trafficker. 🚨NEW: It's been known for years that U.S. Judge Bruce Reinhart, who issued the warrant for the FBI’s raid on President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in 2022, once worked for Jeffrey Epstein -- joining his legal team after serving at the U.S. Attorney's Office that prosecuted… — Headline USA (@HeadlineUSA) Indeed, Reinhart incorporated his private practice, Bruce E. Reinhart P.A., on Oct. 23, 2007, listing his address at 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, Florida. Exactly one week later, Epstein incorporated an organization called the Florida Science Foundation at the same address, which is also the office of his former lead attorney, Jack Goldberger. Epstein would go on to work at the Florida Science Foundation on work-release while serving his 13-month sentence in 2008 and 2009—what’s widely been described as a “sweetheart” plea deal—for procuring a child for prostitution. When House Oversight Committee investigators presented this evidence to Acosta last month, he expressed surprise. “So you’ve just disclosed something that I did not know,” Acosta said. “I knew that he had left to work for Epstein while this case was pending. I did not know that he is the one that filed these articles of incorporation.” Acosta also said it was unethical for Reinhart to have incorporated his private law practice while he was still working for the DOJ. Most of the House Oversight Committee’s interview with Acosta focused on the plea deal his office granted Epstein. Acosta served as Trump’s Labor Secretary from 2017 to 2019, resigning after his role in the plea deal was thrust back into the public spotlight when Epstein was arrested again in July 2019. Acosta has defended the plea deal on the grounds that it did result in Epstein’s incarceration and registration as a sex offender. By far the biggest revelation from the new Acosta interview: The judge who approved the Mar-a-Lago raid once shared office space with Epstein. The judge also worked for the DOJ in Southern Florida while that office was prosecuting Epstein, then he went on to work for Epstein!!! — Ken Silva (@JD_Cashless) During his interview with the House Oversight Committee, he said taking Epstein to trial would’ve been a “crapshoot.” He also blamed Epstein’s work-release on local authorities. “He obtained work release from the Palm Beach sheriff under a factual situation that’s sketchy at best,” Acosta said. “I don’t remember all the details, but I think his work release was at an institution that had just been incorporated, or something along those lines. That was the Palm Beach sheriff’s decision.” Ken Silva is the editor of Headline USA. Follow him at . Mon, 10/20/2025 - 09:40
Don Lemon Urges 'Black And Brown' Americans To Arm Themselves Against ICE Don Lemon Urges 'Black And Brown' Americans To Arm Themselves Against ICE , Disgraced former CNN host urged “black” and “brown” Americans on Wednesday to take up arms, warning they could be swept up in President Donald Trump’s ICE operations.  image He made the incendiary claim during a , citing the small number of cases involving U.S. citizens being briefly detained by ICE in cities like Chicago.  “I just want to be very clear here. I am not condoning or promoting violence,” Lemon began, before invoking the Second Amendment. “Here’s what I’m saying to black and brown people, to Mexican people, to people who are here legally and who can go and buy a gun legally and have a license to carry legally: Go do it! Why not? Go do it! It is your Second Amendment right.”  Don Lemon instructs illegal aliens "to go out and get a gun because when you have people knocking on your door and taking you away, isn't that what the second amendment was written for?" The left is trying to get ICE agents killed. — CJ Pearson (@thecjpearson) Lemon then urged “black households,” “Indian Americans,” “Mexican Americans,” and, as he put it, “whatever you are,” to purchase firearms legally, claiming the show of force could discourage the Trump administration from conducting immigration raids.  “Get a license to carry legally,” he said. “Because when you have people knocking on your door and taking you away without due process as a citizen, isn’t that what the Second Amendment was written for?”  He continued, “Go back and read what the Second Amendment says. And perhaps it will knock some sense … in the heads of these people who are saying: ‘Well, it’s all great. I don’t believe they’re doing it without due process. They’re asking people for papers. They’re not really beating people up. These people are doing things that are illegal.’”   Lemon’s comments come amid the legacy media’s fixation on rare cases of American citizens briefly detained during ICE raids, most of which are quickly clarified or resolved.  White House border czar Tom Homan has repeatedly clarified that ICE conducts only targeted operations focused on individuals with existing deportation orders. However, illegal aliens without such orders, as well as citizens lacking proper identification, may be temporarily detained if swept up during these raids.  When reached by email, Lemon could not provide evidence of any widespread targeting of U.S. citizens by ICE by the time of publication.  Watch Lemon’s full remarks below: Mon, 10/20/2025 - 09:00
Ill. Gov. JB Pritzker's Tax Docs Show $10.3M Income, $1.4M In "Gambling" Gains Ill. Gov. JB Pritzker's Tax Docs Show $10.3M Income, $1.4M In "Gambling" Gains Nothing says 'in touch with working class Americans' more than casually throwing around millions at casinos...just ask Gov. JB Pritzker... Five months before Democratic primary voters hit the polls, Gov. JB Pritzker — Illinois’ billionaire governor and Hyatt heir — dropped partial tax records showing he and his wife pulled in over $10.3 million in taxable income last year, including a tidy $1.4 million from gambling, .  As usual, the release came with big numbers and small transparency: Pritzker’s campaign shared only the top pages of his returns, leaving the juicy details of his fortune (and those famously murky trusts) safely out of view. The $10.3 million haul was his biggest in years, up from $3.2 million in 2023 and $2.3 million in 2022 — though still shy of the $18.5 million in 2021. Asked about the jump, a campaign spokesperson offered the usual shrug: “Certain trusts make distributions each year…” image Those same trusts paid $4.5 million to the state and $30.2 million to the feds. The Pritzkers personally kicked in another $1.6 million in federal taxes and $512,000 to Illinois. As for that gambling income, the campaign clarified that “The Governor had winnings and losses from a casino during the year.”  Thanks for that incredible clarification. Meanwhile, his 2026 running mate, Christian Mitchell, made a modest-by-comparison $583,600. Forbes pegs Pritzker’s net worth at $3.9 billion, up a casual $200 million from last year. As for Zero Hedge readers, they appear to be skeptical. One responded to our Tweet pointing out this story by https://x.com/BrometheusPound/status/1978805679822434378 : "Kalshi prediction markets - he took the over on chicago crime." "The gambling income is definitely not bribe money laundering. Definitely not," https://x.com/manwithahammer/status/1978804935555768781 another follower: "Pritzker is gambling every time he bends over to tie his shoes." Pritzker likes to say he’s in a “blind trust,” though experts note it’s not that blind — he still gets enough info to fill out required disclosures. He’s promised to donate any profits from companies with state contracts after leaving office. The governor and his wife also gave $3.3 million to charity last year, doubling their 2023 donations. All told, Pritzker’s political spending remains as massive as his fortune — about half a billion dollars so far, including over $130 million to clobber Darren Bailey in 2022. Not bad for a guy who technically doesn’t take a paycheck from the state. Thu, 10/16/2025 - 09:25
RFK Jr. Demands Med Schools Teach Nutrition: "Master The Language Of Prevention" RFK Jr. Demands Med Schools Teach Nutrition: "Master The Language Of Prevention" Arguing that preventable and chronic diseases can be ratcheted back through diet, nutritional health and lifestyle choices, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has directed medical programs to embed nutrition education into curricula and testing. “Every future physician should master the language of prevention before they even touch a stethoscope,” he said in announcing the initiative recently. “In the future, doctors won’t just prescribe drugs, they’ll be able to prescribe diets as well.” The directive comes as the Department of Health and Human Services works to develop updated U.S. dietary guidelines, expected to be released by December. image The Health Department, along with the Department of Education, has tasked all medical programs across the nation with adding nutrition education into curricula, medical licensing exams, residency requirements, and board certification, https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-education-nutrition-medical-training-reforms.html  to a news release.  Kennedy, in a https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=7g7zL0bDfGs  announcing the development, said poor nutrition takes over one million American lives per year through “diet-related illnesses.”  He wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed that nothing is being done to address this. “Accrediting bodies and medical organizations look the other way, declining to set clear requirements. We train physicians to wield the latest surgical tools, but not to guide patients on how to stay out of the operating room in the first place,” Kennedy https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/wsj-kennedy-op-ed-nutrition-education-requirements-in-medical-training.html . A https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-education-nutrition-medical-training-reforms.html  announcing the new requirements stated that while “recent Association of American Medical Colleges data shows that all U.S. medical schools claim to cover nutrition, other studies show the majority of medical students report receiving fewer than two hours of instruction.” “Research published in 2024 documents that 75% of U.S. medical schools have no required clinical nutrition classes, and only 14% of residency programs have a required nutrition curriculum.” “Future physicians must graduate prepared to prevent disease—by assessing risk, guiding lifestyle change, providing nutritional counseling, educating patients and addressing environmental factors, with nutrition education as the most proven and powerful tool,” Kennedy stated in his op-ed. Dr. Joe Kosterich, a well-known https://www.drjoetoday.com/about-joe/ , said he believes the effort is a bipartisan one. He said he agrees that Kennedy has correctly identified the food chain as a significant contributor to ill health. Furthermore, Kosterich said that in his own experience, nutrition is given very little attention in medical school, which he equates to mechanics not knowing what fuel is best for a car.  Using medical schools as the starting point for a reformation of nutrition education is a good start, according to Kosterich, but added that current doctors should not be neglected either; they need this fundamental knowledge as much as their successors. Med school representatives at the University of Pennsylvania and UC San Diego did not respond to requests from The College Fix for comment. Tue, 10/14/2025 - 18:25
Newsom Signs Law Requiring Online Age Verification Newsom Signs Law Requiring Online Age Verification California Gov. Gavin Newsom has signed into law a series of state bills that will require age verification to access Apple and Google devices, impose social media warning labels, and regulate artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots and the creation of “deepfake” videos. image The seven bills were passed by the California Legislature during its 2025–2026 legislative session and were signed on Oct. 12. Some of the statutes will take effect on Jan. 1, 2027, while others—related to “deepfake” pornography and legal defenses against liability for AI usage—are effective immediately. “We’ve seen some truly horrific and tragic examples of young people harmed by unregulated tech, and we won’t stand by while companies continue,” Newsom in a statement. The bill on age verification, https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB1043/2025 , would require operating systems, such as Apple’s iOS and Google’s Android, to determine whether a user was under 13 years old, between 13 and 16, between 16 and 18, or over 18 years of age, and then curate content available to them accordingly. The restriction would apply to in-built software on those operating systems—such as the Apple App Store and the Google Play Store used to download mobile applications. Violations of this rule may incur civil penalties of $2,500 per child for each incident and up to $7,500 per child for intentional violations. Assembly Bill 1043 does not impose age verification requirements to access pornographic websites, which 25 other states have recently imposed, causing several, such as Pornhub, to shut down their operations in those states. A separate bill to impose such requirements in California, https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB3080/2023 by the state senate. Another piece of legislation, Assembly Bill 621, imposes steep penalties for producing or sharing “deepfake” pornographic videos, where AI programs are used to create realistic depictions of real people engaging in sexual activity, often with faces adapted from publicly available photographs. The bill allows plaintiffs who sue to recover a maximum of $250,000 from defendants who create or share such content with malice, as well as punitive damages and legal fees. The bill does not impose liability on social media companies, however, for content posted on their platforms, consistent with federal law under Section 230 of the Communications Act. A separate bill signed by Newsom, https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB316/2025 , does not allow users of AI to shield themselves from liability when the AI, prompted by them, creates content that harms another person. A bill regarding social media warning labels, https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB56/2025 , would require companies to warn users under 17 when they have cumulatively spent more than three hours a day on that platform. It does not apply to specific content on those platforms, which in the past have been heavily criticized by conservatives for being politically biased and censorious. Tue, 10/14/2025 - 17:00
San Fran Leftists Triggered As Tech Billionaire Calls For National Guard Troops San Fran Leftists Triggered As Tech Billionaire Calls For National Guard Troops A long-left-leaning billionaire philanthropist has triggered San Francisco politicians by praising President Trump's performance in office -- and even more so by urging Trump to deploy National Guard soldiers to suppress the city's rampant criminality. "I fully support the president," said Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff in an interview with the New York Times. "I think he’s doing a great job." That puts Benioff at stark odds with his fellow San Franciscans: In a June Public Policy Institute of California poll, of Trump's performance. Benioff recounted his recent honor of sitting across a table from Trump at a state dinner hosted by King Charles at Windsor Castle, and said he used the dinner to tell Trump “how grateful I am for everything he’s doing.” image The  notes that Benioff, a major benefactor of San Francisco, has leaned toward the left side of the spectrum -- for example, urging other business leaders to help the homeless rather than gripe about their existence. Now, however, as homeless, drugged-out criminals are destroying San Francisco, he's ready for soldiers and Humvees to pour into the city he says is woefully under-policed -- figuring it needs another 1,000 cops on top of the 1,500 that are currently on the force.  The situation has compelled Benioff to take matters into his own hands, where his upcoming Dreamforce conference is concerned: He's hiring hundreds of off-duty cops to secure the area around the San Francisco convention area. “You’ll see. When you walk through San Francisco next week, there will be cops on every corner,” Benioff said. “That’s how it used to be.” Until the city's police force is beefed up, Benioff endorses the use of National Guard soldiers. “We don’t have enough cops, so ,” he said.  image That's a particularly interesting stance, given Benioff is close friends with California Gov. Gavin Newsom -- so close, in fact, that https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/11/slap-in-the-face-marc-benioffs-trump-turn-stuns-san-francisco-00604421 . As Benioff endorses Trump deployment of National Guard troops to San Francisco, Newsom is suing the Trump administration over the deployment of Guard soldiers to Los Angeles. Benioff's left-leaning resume also includes his hosting of a major 2016 fundraiser for Hillary Clinton at his $31 million mansion alongside the Presidio, and his personal bankrolling of a city ballot measure to raise taxes on businesses to fund welfare for the homeless.   "This is a slap in the face to San Francisco," Matt Dorsey, a member of the city's Board of Supervisors, wrote on X. "It’s insulting to our cops, and it’s honestly galling to those of us who’ve been fighting hard over the last few years to fully staff our [police department]... in San Francisco.” Assemblyman Matt Haney decried Benioff's "support [of] a direct assault and occupation of our city," while the Times described San Francisco DA Brooke Jenkins as "livid" over Benioff's stance on troops.  To be fair to him, how could Benioff have anticipated that taxing all the businesses and giving the $$ to vagrants would result in many fewer businesses and many more vagrants? — Moses Kagan (@moseskagan) It's safe to say a Benioff aide anticipated the backlash: The Times story about the phone interview with him aboard his private plane concludes in amusing fashion:  At the end of the interview, he turned to a public relations executive. He could be heard asking why her mouth was wide open and if he had said anything he shouldn’t have. “What about the political questions?” he asked. “Too spicy?” Then he hung up.  San Francisco Mayor last month: There will no longer be an option for people to sleep and use drugs on our streets. San Francisco today:https://t.co/0RAkC3h8Mg — Kevin Dalton (@TheKevinDalton) In August, , telling reporters in the Oval Office, “You look at what the Democrats have done to San Francisco — they’ve destroyed it...we’ll clean that one up, too.” Sat, 10/11/2025 - 18:05
DOJ Opens Probe Into First Brands' Shocking Bankruptcy DOJ Opens Probe Into First Brands' Shocking Bankruptcy Earlier today, when following up on what is the biggest story of the week, if not year, we said that the First Brands bankruptcy, where a ... image ... means that at least $1.9 billion in cash has disappeared, has been completely ignored by virtually everyone due to the far shinier daily AI circle jerk, which helps melt stocks up every single day and serves as a wonderful distraction to everything else. This is a huge story - rehypothecated off balance sheet debt leading to huge bankruptcy - and nobody cares because daily AI circle jerk — zerohedge (@zerohedge) But we were wrong, because someone was paying attention: the Trump DOJ. Citing "people familiar", the that the Department of Justice has opened an inquiry into the collapse of the bankrupt First Brands Group, as federal prosecutors look to untangle how investors and creditors have been left with billions of dollars in potential losses, in what may be very bad news for the company's banker, Jefferies, which in August was preparing to do a $6 billion refi of the company only to see it slide in bankruptcy a month later. No surprise Jefferies stocks has plunged 30% in the past 3 weeks.  The probe is being led by the US attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York, the Manhattan unit that handles large, complex white-collar cases. The inquiry, which is in its earliest stage, has been described as a fact-finding mission given the company filed for bankruptcy protection less than two weeks ago, and many of the details about First Brands’ finances remain unclear. To be sure, it is not unusual for prosecutors to open investigations when there are public reports of large financial losses stemming from alleged irregularities, and the bar for doing so is low. While the FT notes, that such probes do not necessarily mean any wrongdoing has occurred and may not lead to charges being filed or cases being brought, in this case - where over $2 billion appears to be definitively missing - wrongdoing is all but certain. As we reported , on Wednesday one of the largest creditors to First Brands alleged that as much as $2.3bn had “simply vanished” as part of the company’s abrupt failure. That lender, one of several who had provided off-balance sheet financing relying on that collateral, is now pushing for an external investigation into the company’s actions leading up to the bankruptcy. “The debtors should not be permitted to appoint the very parties that will investigate their own potential misconduct,” the counsel for Raistone, one of the companies that helped arrange off-balance sheet financings for First Brands, wrote in an emergency petition last night. Separately, First Brands appointed two independent directors to probe how the company financed itself through these opaque off-balance sheet vehicles, summarized in the charts below. The company, which makes windshield wipers and fuel tank pumps for cars, had relied on a web of financiers to fund its operations and a wave of acquisitions. Asked at a bankruptcy hearing this month where roughly $2bn raised by First Brands through “factoring” - a type of off-balance sheet invoice financing using receivables and inventories - was held, a lawyer for the company said, “we don’t have it”, and “there’s $12mn in the bank account today. That’s it. There’s nothing else.” As we detailed yesterday, some of the biggest names on Wall Street have been drawn into the debacle, including hedge fund Millennium Management, Swiss banking giant UBS, but most notably investment bank Jefferies, whose actions will be closely scrutinized by the DOJ in the coming days.  Thu, 10/09/2025 - 23:45
CDC Says COVID-19 Vaccination Now Up To Each Individual CDC Says COVID-19 Vaccination Now Up To Each Individual (emphasis ours), The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention no longer broadly recommends COVID-19 vaccination. The agency now says that each person should take a range of factors into account, and consult with their doctor, before receiving a shot. image “Informed consent is back,” Jim O'Neill, the CDC’s acting director, https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/cdc-immunization-schedule-individual-decision-covid19-standalone-chickenpox-toddlers.html in a statement on Oct. 6 after accepting advice from the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel. “CDC’s 2022 blanket recommendation for perpetual COVID-19 boosters deterred health care providers from talking about the risks and benefits of vaccination for the individual patient or parent. That changes today.” The official term for the updated posture is shared clinical decision-making. Under other tiers, vaccination is recommended for everyone or everyone in a certain age or risk group. “Shared clinical decision-making recommendations are individually based and informed by a decision process between the health care provider and the patient or parent/guardian,” the CDC on its website. The CDC for years recommended virtually all people aged 6 months and older receive a COVID-19 vaccine, along with updated versions on an annual basis. Around 44 percent of people aged 65 or older received a COVID-19 vaccine in late 2024 or early 2025, according to CDC data. About 14 percent of adults aged 18 to 49, 13 percent of children, and 10 percent of health care workers received a vaccine during that time. Under orders from Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the agency in May COVID-19 vaccination for healthy children and pregnant women. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel, in September unanimously that the CDC should change from its near-universal recommendation to shared clinical decision-making, in part because panel members said data supporting vaccine effectiveness is weak. “At best, the additional protection provided by a seasonal booster is moderate and of short term,” Retsef Levi, chair of the panel’s COVID-19 immunization workgroup, during the meeting. Members also said that they were concerned about side effects the vaccines can cause, including myocarditis, a form of heart inflammation. The panel’s advice is typically accepted by the CDC. The Food and Drug Administration recently withdrew emergency authorization for the COVID-19 vaccines. In updated approvals, it the shots for people who are at least 6 months old who have one or more risk factors, as well as for people 65 and older. Two of the shots are made by Moderna. One is made by Pfizer and BioNTech. The other is made by Novavax. Some outside groups, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, still COVID-19 vaccination for broader populations, including all children aged 6 to 23 months. Tue, 10/07/2025 - 13:40