Jamel

As a man Never become a retirement plan for modern women

I'm not surprised African countries failed after independence. Things were not set up for success at independence. POLITICAL PROBLEMS 1. Many African countries were ruled via traditional authorities (indirect rule) for most of the colonial era and representative democracy didn't become the norm till about a decade before independence. This led to the subversion of traditional institutions (making them lapdogs to the modern state, both colonial and post colonial) while having nascent democratic institutions that weren't yet mature enough for independent rule. This broke political continuity from the past, as traditional political institutions were transformed into social institutions while the newly formed political institutions hadn't been tested long enough to be certain of viability. 2. Most African countries, if not all, had a barely educated and poorly educated elite class. Very few university graduates, and most of them in the arts and humanities, rather than in STEM or business. The new elites in most cases did not have the organizational capabilities or human capital of the colonizers they replaced. In many cases they did not even have the common sense of the colonizers. 3. Most African countries were incoherent. They were nations only on the map, but lacked the kind of linguistic, ethnic, religious and cultural coherence required for nationhood. This meant that the democratic institutions that were still in their infancy were dealing with levels of complexity that their European colonial masters did not deal with in their own countries. Inter ethnic squabbling became the main feature of politics in most African countries. 4. Most African countries had government control over the capital cities and a few other cities but largely ignored rural areas. The government only had effective control in the cities. Thus, despite having a minority of the population in urban areas, those urban centers had a disproportionate political influence. The ethnic incoherence and the disproportionate urban influence often meant that the political elites were alienated from the majority of their population since they did not possess the same ethnic or social background as their population. Their policies often reflected this alienation. ECONOMIC PROBLEMS 5. African countries had a very rudimentary and unsophisticated economy at independence, with economic output limited to low value products. 6. Independence era governments inherited colonial economies in the sense that the entire economies of countries were designed to fit into an empire's economy as a source of a specific raw material and nothing else. Local needs were secondary to the need to export that single product. Infrastructure was geared towards that goal rather than meeting local needs. 7. African countries were usually mono economies with the bulk of exports being from one product: A natural resource like gold or diamond, or a crop like cocoa. Economies grew and died based on the price of that one product on the global market. 8. Often the rural agricultural population whose economic activities was the major component of the country's economy subsidized the urban population. The gains from their enterprise was nationalized while the benefits went to building more schools and providing more unnecessary government jobs in cities. 9. Industries that required technical skill were still in European hands at independence. Many African countries simply transferred control to less competent hands with nationalization policies. SUMMARY The demographic composition of the countries and the radical political changes that took place over a short period meant that African countries were much more politically complex than European countries while having much weaker and untested political institutions and infrastructure. The economies of most countries were colonial economies and there was no local knowhow to transform them into national economies.

It’s wild how sex clears a man’s mind. Before it, desire paints everything in gold. After it, reality steps in, the noise fades, and he finally sees you for who you are, not who his hormones imagined. That’s when he decides if he wants you or just the moment.

Intimacy exposes character. That’s why men pause to think after, not before. Sex is data. Men analyze, then decide. That’s just the logic of attraction. Men don’t commit to bodies, they commit to aligned energy. Sex tells the story.

The world only respects results not intentions. A man’s value multiplies when he builds himself, so he should never settle for less than what matches his growth, peace, and purpose.

Women are all curved from the same Tree... Soon as you push them to be better they will leave you for what the believe they deserve... The Entitlement is legendary.. And the funny part is the idiots in these positions don't learn.

Order creates peace. A woman under no authority lives in chaos First her father, then her husband—that’s structure not oppression Submission isn’t weakness, it’s alignment Rebellion destroys homes; obedience builds legacy Respecting hierarchy is what keeps love & peace intact

A woman who cannot be controlled or being told what to do by her man cannot stay married. It doesn't matter how much she earns.

Please do anything legal and legitimate to escape poverty. The world is cruel to a poor man.

Here’s the blunt truth: you cannot control your daughter’s choices or dictate behaviour like flipping a switch. What you can do is raise a daughter who values herself, knows her worth, and makes decisions from a place of strength, not fear.