Thread

This is not about guns, at all.

Putting aside that the murdered man was against what you’re suggesting, gun concentration (what some people erroneously call “gun control”) is gun violence, because everything The State does is ultimately backed up by gun violence or threats thereof. Additionally, gun concentration policies have a very poor track record for anyone The State deems undesirable, I’m sure you’re aware of enough 20th century history to know that. Knowing this, my answer is and will always be: stack up and try. Also, there are some words that come to mind when I think of someone using a political opponents brutal murder to try to score political points for something he would vehemently oppose, but loving is about as far from my mind as you can get.

By definition gun laws won't stop someone who is going to break the law. Governments and criminals will always have access to guns. The only question here is if law-abiding citizens can have them.