Value for Value and Nostr struggling with the missing network effect

During our Monthly Meshtadel call we were briefly touched on Nostr and V4V (and music scene in general). The discussion stayed with me afterward, and it pushed me to articulate why Value for Value on Nostr feels early rather than broken (even if I don't post that much on Nostr), and why the current moment is not a sign of decay but a sign of emergence.

Value for Value is a beautiful concept. Creators release their work freely, audiences reward freely, and the relationship between the two becomes direct, fair, and independent of attention farms or ad driven platforms. It seems obvious that a protocol like Nostr should be the natural home for this idea. Both Value for Value and Nostr emphasize sovereignty, openness, and a move away from centralized control.

So why does Value for Value feel slow on Nostr today, even for people who believe in it completely? Or even Nostr often feels like regurgitation of similar topics and ideas, rather than the source of all good information as we seemed to think what Nostr could become?

I would think both require discoverability, and Nostr in its current form does not yet provide strong propagation. Without propagation there is no discovery, without discovery there is no audience, and without an audience Value for Value does not yet have the momentum that many expect. Which in turn also means that people that want to share their stuff (be it art, daring adventures, silly vids, or yes music) will not turn to these V4V platforms as a stand alone (or even as partial integrations such as Wavlake when we talk about music)

This does not mean failure. It means early stage.

Nostr and V4V is not dying. It is taking shape and exploring how and where it fits in "the market". And I think it will be taking shape as a complementary layer rather than an attempt to kill or replace legacy platforms.

The Missing Propagation Layer

Mainstream platforms excel at one thing above everything else. They push content outward. They are propagation machines. Their survival depends on finding, ranking, and aggressively distributing whatever keeps viewers watching and users scrolling.

Yes, there is a lot of slob being pushed by using and abusing the algorithms, but it is there where innovators (and I mean the content-creation innovators looking for an audience) will try to get noticed.

Nostr is different. It is a protocol, not a platform. A protocol does not enforce trending pages, recommendation engines, curated feeds, or virality maps. Nostr gives identity, posting, and movement between clients and relays, but it does not push anything outward by itself. More over, it is mainly used by a niche group, often bitcoin oriented, and not even the majority of them (Not that this would be preferential to see as target audience).

This philosophical purity also creates a practical challenge. Discovery is weak. Even excellent work can remain invisible unless someone already connected happens to see it. It is important that even if we might think we might be forerunners, and those that have a big following on Nostr are true pioneers,... without at least early adopters and preferably early majority there is not enough critical mass to make the difference for the artist, with micropayments for those that consume the offered V4V content.

Propagation is the missing ingredient.

Why Value for Value Needs Visibility

Value for Value becomes alive when creators reach people. A creator needs attention before value can flow back.

This explains why some Value for Value attempts succeed instantly while others struggle. A well known example helps clarify the point.

The Radiohead Precedent

When Radiohead released their album In Rainbows with a pay what you want approach, it became one of the most profitable releases of its time. Not because the model was already well established, but because Radiohead began with millions of dedicated listeners. They did not need discovery. They did not need propagation. Their audience arrived with them.

Most creators on Nostr do not have this kind of pre existing audience. They need the network to introduce them to communities and new listeners. Without a propagation engine, even brilliant posts and ideas remain confined to small clusters.

Replacing Static Media through Nostr Native Tools

Many traditional content formats can be replaced or mirrored through Nostr or Nostr integrated workflows. The pieces are already emerging.

Blogs can become long form Nostr notes,
Newsletters can become Nostr subscription streams,
Landing pages can be replaced by indexed topic hubs,
RSS style syndication can grow from Nostr events,
Search engines can be replaced by clients that index chosen creators, topics, keywords, or communities,
Community hubs can be created simply by selecting groups of npubs to watch together.

The missing piece is a more developed discovery ecosystem. A Nostr client acting as a crawler, an indexer, and a curator could build the needed visibility layer. Some early versions exist, but nothing has yet become the widely used tool for this. (For myself I mainly 'consume' short notes via https://rabbit.syusui.net/#/ which looks a bit like the old TweetDeck. )

When this layer arrives, Value for Value on Nostr will feel intuitive.

Nostr will not kill Legacy Media, but might be what completes it.

This is the point that matters most. Nostr is not going to win when fighting against legacy social media platforms (where the propagation takes place). Nostr has the potential of winning the content monetization by turning it into creator monetization 🤔

Creators today use legacy platforms as amplification channels while keeping their identity and their community on Nostr.

Nostr content is referenced by
Twitter threads,
YouTube creators,
Podcasters linking to Nostr first,
Blogs embedding zaps and notes,
Newsletters pointing readers toward Nostr communities.

This is not a symptom of weakness. It is a normal pattern of early growth.

Early blogs spread through forums,
Early video creators promoted through personal sites,
Early Bitcoin lived on mailing lists and technical chats,
Every young network leverages the older ones to grow.

Nostr is doing exactly what a protocol based medium should be doing, but shouldn't be seen as a "social media"-end product. OR at least the killer app on Nostr isn't ready yet to pull in the Early Majority

The Future Moves in a Complementary Direction

The likely development path looks like this

→ Discovery begins on legacy platforms
→ Communities consolidate on Nostr where identity and content remain durable
→ Value for Value becomes the natural reward system
→ Topic indexes, search engines, curation layers, and community hubs grow inside Nostr
→ Value for Value becomes frictionless for creators → Nostr becomes a communication protocol that allows to have an IoC(ommunities) rather than an IoT.

This is not a replacement of legacy media. It is a complementary addition that provides permanence, sovereignty, and direct value flow, and evolving far beyond Social Media Platform (which it now doesn't do with an abundant success)

Why I Am Posting This on Nostr Anyway

Knowing that this note will not propagate widely, I am putting it on Nostr only. It is a message intended first for the members of the Meshtadel. It is a reflection I want to share with exactly those who were part of the call that sparked it. If others see it and find value, that is completely fine, but the audience I have in mind is small, intentional, and already present.

PS: A Thought About Private Layers

I can imagine a Nostr collection point that uses simple PGP encryption based on shared secrets or npubs to unlock parts of notes. Not for secrecy, but for a softer form of privacy. A way for content to be visible only to those who care enough to engage, explore, or decrypt. Not a wall, just a small doorway that rewards curiosity.