I'm slowly coming around to the following roadmap:
1. Simplified CTV for whole-tx commitments (ie you *will* spend this output using a tx which exactly like X.
2. Optimised sponsors for solving the "but how do I add fees" problem in a way that doesn't drive miner centralisation.
3. Script restoration so we can don't have arbitrary limits on things like amount arithmetic and examination sizes.
4. Introspection opcode(s) so we can examine txs flexibly.
5. Script enhancements for things like merkle proofs (e.g Taproot trees) and tweaks, checksig.
You could argue that #1 is simply an optimisation of #3/#4, and that's true, but it's also an obvious case (once you have #2) that we will still want even when we have all the rest.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (5)
This looks good to me at first consideration.
All I want is zk verifiers and a secure trustless bridge, I think your proposal gets is there all the way.
Max, wen your opinion in the table?
i’ve been testing out p2a with ctv, it seems to work pretty well, what is the mining centralisation you referred to and is it related to this in anyway? thanks 

X (formerly Twitter)
stu 🥪🥞 (@stutxo) on X
having fun learning ctv, here is an example of how to spend a ctv contract with zero fees using a pay to anchor output 🥪 +⚓ = 😋
https...
