Thread

I think it's a good idea for more people to understand nodes at a deeper technical level, especially for issues like the Core vs. Knots (or whatever else) software. I've heard what I think are equally convincing arguments from both camps (I haven't listened to them all), but I'm still pretty much down the middle. And given my lack of deep technical understanding, I have always ran a Core node. I still do. I may not update right away to see how things shake out, but that's just a neutral position for me. At some point I'll need to know enough to make an actual decision. The main lesson for me is to not wait until I need to be educated on a topic. I generally try to stay well rounded, but I need to do a better job of it. We *should* be able to trust experts, but the last several years has taught me that I need to at least verify what I'm being told to the best of my ability. Tribalism can derail people pretty quickly. Generally, it's a good sign when someone is telling you to study something for yourself to make an informed decision.

Replies (1)

Whats cool about something as complicated and extensive in areas of impact as Bitcoin, is that the lessons present themselves as things come up and the motivation to learn is also inherent to there being an issue everyone is looking at. The layperson like myself will always be reacting to the issues and learning to stay up to speed, but that is ok. I do have a full time job and family and other responsibilities, as you probably do. Someone whose livelihood is centered around Bitcoin can afford the time to stay immersed all the time. Fortunately Bitcoin will always be fascinating enough to be worthy of study!