Thread

I think it's a good idea for more people to understand nodes at a deeper technical level, especially for issues like the Core vs. Knots (or whatever else) software. I've heard what I think are equally convincing arguments from both camps (I haven't listened to them all), but I'm still pretty much down the middle. And given my lack of deep technical understanding, I have always ran a Core node. I still do. I may not update right away to see how things shake out, but that's just a neutral position for me. At some point I'll need to know enough to make an actual decision. The main lesson for me is to not wait until I need to be educated on a topic. I generally try to stay well rounded, but I need to do a better job of it. We *should* be able to trust experts, but the last several years has taught me that I need to at least verify what I'm being told to the best of my ability. Tribalism can derail people pretty quickly. Generally, it's a good sign when someone is telling you to study something for yourself to make an informed decision.
DudeChicken's avatar DudeChicken
Asking Claude about OP_RETURN in Bitcoin Core
Read article →

Replies (12)

This simple statement is quite complex. I have an entire healthcare career outside of this stuff. I spend a lot of time remaining great at what I do. This is why I was sad to see trust in experts killed during the Covid situation. It's unreasonable for everyone to deeply understand the technical aspects of how their money works (or most other topics). We also need developers who are more careful about how they present issues and interact with the public/community. I think a lot of Bitcoin controversy stems from generally poor communication. The same is true for those who decide to be learners and educators in this space. There's a lot of unhelpful emotion and character attacks from what I've chosen to look at.
jb55 was telling us that spam already exists on Bitcoin and can't be stopped when the compromised Core devs deliberately allowed inscription spam by rejecting Luke's fix. Inscription spam is fixed in Bitcoin Knots. image
BitcoinIsFuture's avatar BitcoinIsFuture
See the compromised Core devs who rejected Luke's PR that fixes inscription spam. They are the bad actors (the NACKers) They revealed themselves with their public comments on OP_RETRUN being dishonest and manipulative. The guys that ACKed are the good guys we have. image https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28408 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29187 Bitcoin Knots has fixed those issues.
View quoted note →
Whats cool about something as complicated and extensive in areas of impact as Bitcoin, is that the lessons present themselves as things come up and the motivation to learn is also inherent to there being an issue everyone is looking at. The layperson like myself will always be reacting to the issues and learning to stay up to speed, but that is ok. I do have a full time job and family and other responsibilities, as you probably do. Someone whose livelihood is centered around Bitcoin can afford the time to stay immersed all the time. Fortunately Bitcoin will always be fascinating enough to be worthy of study!