It's gonna be hilarious when we reach the point that it appears half of the network is running Knots and yet absolutely nothing changes regarding activity on chain. π
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (16)
My guess is that only a small number of OP-RETURN-unlimited nodes are sufficient to get those transactions into blocks. Would you agree?
Those nodes will get the transactions into the miners, even if there are millions of OP-return-small nodes. Right?
Yep
Is it true that the more nodes would reject a certain transaction, the higher fee will be needed to get it into a block? Hence making it harder to spam?
Nope.
Logically it makes sense but I guess there will always be nodes with little integrity who would accept the unwanted transaction.
I'm saying: make it harder to spam, not impossible. If a transaction is rejected by some nodes, it is more likely for it to be outpaced by the widely accepted transaction. So in order to make sure it gets into a block, the spammer might need to increase the fee. Especially if he's in a hurry. What am I missing?
The cope from core is hilarious. You can't stand it that you aren't worshiped like you think you deserve, and people are choosing not to run your garbage. Keep crying.
I don't need your worship because I understand how data propagates over the network. You can run whatever you want and it won't stop the spam you detest. Feel free to prove me wrong.
Then who cares either way, let people follow their principles.
If nothing is changing then whatβs the issue
View quoted note β
Isn't that the whole point?
Core Devs are encouraging spam and people are switching to knots to prevent that spam from taking over.
So like if everyone switches to core and "nothing changes" that's actually the whole entire point.
They are trying to prevent a negative change from happening
If everyone switches to knots and nothing changes I meant to write
Then what's your answer to this? π§‘π«£
Massive nothingburger FUD that's being recycled from a decade ago.
Can you show me something where it's mentioned 10 years ago? Been a Bitcoiner 5 years and never heard this angle before. π€
Dismissing something as FUD isn't an argument. Please explain how willfully storing and relaying CP is not possession with intent to distribute.
#theyknotlikeus