Thread

The core philosophy of Bitcoin is to be an alternative to the state, not a new asset class for it. You can't be the resistance if the government is buying your ammunition. Can we truly be a rebellion for change if our "enemy" is a co-owner of our primary asset to do so? #asknostr

Replies (23)

That’s exactly right !! The govt want to half centralized btc , and it achieved with dilution with other coin (e.g eth , usdt ) in-the network . Man will see new variation of BTC network such as ( btc core v30c, knots , knobs and many more to come ) that enabling those coins using on btc chain .
🛡️
Problem stater. As you say there’s nothing you can do but… blame the podcasters? Whoever wants bitcoin should (and obv can) be able to freely obtain it. Even your sworn enemy. Everything should be done to *increase* the ability to obtain it. Especially paper bitcoin holders (ETFs). The key holders actually have some value not an IOU and there’s a decent chance Saylor has to hand over the bitcoin to the government one day anyway. So that just makes me stronger.
Nope, the core philosophy of bitcoin is being P2P money that doesn't use third parties to transact, do you read the whitepaper? Yes we can, if state can't control that asset, but if they can they don't co-own, they own and in my vision they already own it, they only do not exercize any measures of control because they don't need to do it. While Bitcoin mining is centralized, bitcoin has no chance of being free.
It's not an alternative to States. It's an alternative FOR States to choose, opposed to empowering centralized monetary powers. First they will buy it but the end goal for sovereign Bitcoin based balance sheets and households is to peacefully destroy those centralized monetary powers, not the States themselves. We have history books full of Revolution. We don't want that but if we have to do that, we now have a new choice available to the following replacement State.