Thread

Replies (28)

Good. Self selects the signal. A paywall by a closed protocol means info can censored, that needs to be out. An open protocol only needs one philanthropist to share that info, and break faith, in game theory terms. In other words, part of having an inteligent signal is recognizing it needs to be financially supported, those who support it finacially have inteligent things to say.
I'd like to see a solid comparison of Jack Dorsey's Twitter vs. Elon's Twitter. My gut instinct is that the one controlled by feds where there was obvious and rampant state censorship and narrative shaping would have a higher "psyop" rating. All that being said, I obviously agree that Nostr is superior.
I hated twitter, but, Twitter might lead to world peace. Its an instant empathy link. The way Bitcoin will/is keeping governments in check, just by virtue of existing as an alternative in a Market of Currencies. Nostr will keep X honest. But: Think about what Twitter has just done. It has held those who need to be held accountable, accountable. De-psyoped, two new psyops a day, aswell as an almost 50+ year culture wide psyop. Palestine has been genocided many times. But never in First Person point of view. It's a whole new "United Nations". The Internet Nation. Drop a solar powered battery, a star link, and a smart phone, and just try and get away with your fucking genocide, assholes. Drop a kit in the congo. Rape stopped. Drop one in voting sensitive areas. Instant encrypted , local voting verification. (I see possible implementations where i.d is not even needed. Just presence near and in range of a node) They will come down hard on Elon now. We know who. I see a middle path. The pivot of which is open sourced and libre hardware though. These past events have shown " the light coming through the wound" of microchip privacy.