Bitcoin influencers on twitter are still high time preference. If they were low time preference, they'd invest their precious time building something for the future that can actually last; Nostr.
People have to learn the hard way, the lesson that if you use someone else's platform you're at their mercy and you can be cancelled at any time. All you're hard work generating content goes up in smoke and any income coming in goes instantly to $0 if you haven't taken steps to decentralize your presence. Some recover, some don't after being cancelled.
People only wake up when it's too late, instead of future-proofing their content on a robust platform you can control #nostr or otherwise.
It's a tale as old as time.
The thing I don't like about your argument, Odell, is that you make it sound like nostr benefits influencers mainly. And that's not only limiting but also discourages the occasional lurker. I'm one of the last kind and although I had never used twitter much, I feel like nostr is far more than twitter ever was. For example, the fact that I can post whatever and subscribe to whatever I want and potentially keep it all anonymous under multiple accounts... These things matter to me as a lurker, punter, observer, pleb.