There is no technical reason the default should be 100,000 bytes instead of 160. It's a pure power play to win the argument once instead of having to justify increasing the number again and again.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies ()
Hoppefully it's just pride and not bad faith
Its a state attack. Simple.
It will be quite refreshing to move on to a new debate next week!
Evil shitcoin manipulator.
They did not give any argument, only lies, gaslighting and manipulations.
Let's just fork this out of existence. Bitcoin is for money, not JPGs, not "data".
Go for it. We've been telling knots folks for 6 months that the only way to achieve their goal is at the consensus level.
not true, we just have to be like 95% share of bitcoin nodes.
Why there needs to be that number at all?
Citrea needs it for their shit. Its how the thing started.
"We're hearing things like Citrea is better than Ethereum," Chainway Labs co-founder Orkun Mahir Kฤฑlฤฑรง told CoinDesk. "It'll be better with time, because there's like $1 trillion, as of now, sitting in the Bitcoin blockchain. It is the most secure, battle-tested and decentralized blockchain. And we are bringing decentralized finance to it." ๐คก๐คก๐คก
coinglass
Bitcoin Zero-Knowledge Rollup Citrea Raises $2.7M in Seed Funding | CoinGlass
It should be zero.
The technical reason is that maintaining code that isn't used anymore is an unnecessary burden and risk for bugs.
So at 83B, the OP_RETURN is actually cheaper to be used than any method that would get the SegWit discount. That flips at 160B? So any protocol that would need more than 160B would bleed sats using OP_RETURN as it would have an unnecessarily high marginal cost.
Now as that is true, it is a very valid argument to consider all protocols that use bigger than 160B OP_RETURNs uninformed or malicious.