Thread

Replies (47)

What you basically claim is that apart from Luke Dashjr everyone in the anti spam side is not technically qualified to see the spam as existential threat. Which is ridiculous considering some of the people on the opposing side are Jimmy Song and Nick Szabo. Not to mention a bunch of very competent other devs with smaller followings like Parman and SuperTestnet. The devs you outsource your adversarial thinking to are all likely compromised. Adam Back and Shitnobi are just on the top of my mind. I can name many more.
You are a shitcoiner my dude and you don’t even know it. β€œpeople’s usage of Bitcoin” sounds like something out of the mouth of a true Marxist. You say spam is degenerate and preferably it wouldn’t exist, but that degenerate spam exists precisely because the people that you *like* and *trust* did enable it for over two years until this degeneracy is now 40% of the entire size of the UTXO set and it’s a real hurdle for node runners, especially future ones.
It’s interesting. In some ways leaving Bitcoin Twitter doesn’t make all that much sense, which is often the way with intuitive decisions, but it β€œfeels” good I think many recognise this And you can see the ethical lines that Bitcoiners, emboldened by the adoption of sound money, now draw Hard no Protocol > platform Free speech > reach Property rights > UX Time will tell if this recipe can match, or outgrow the value of X today