The majority of people are attracted to toxicity and garbage, so it will always exist. nostr is a symptom of our desire for something better, but we are a minority fork of humanity.
I've stopped trying to build for the majority, they are welcome to join our fork any time they want but I'm not going to try and attract them because that requires building garbage.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (3)
I feel you but do you think there are two forks. Or a fork and a knife. π΄
I think that having our own space socially is good. Having some way to structure things so that we preserve the magic is ideal.
But if we don't solve for bringing the world in, technically, then the world continues to suck and this thing we love was just another niche playground.
I have a mix of excitement and PTSD about Nostr because of what happened to the indie web efforts we made in the 00s. It was so similar. Same hopes and dreams, same energy, same promise.
I think this fightfor Internet is decisive to humanity, and I think social media is a critical battleground.
Let's figure out how to save the normies from themselves this time. If not for their sake, for ours. We've gotta scale to win.
That doesn't mean we should pander and build garbage though. You are totally right. "Twitter with more steps" loses anyway. Be should build something new and far better.
But we DO have to solve for adoption too. Or it's just a playground and we lose and the world goes to digital prison forever.
Sorry if that comes out a little dramatic, but not sorry because I mean it.
Take heart! We can win!
Iβm 3 days in on nostr. The design aesthetic is better. The zaps are a new form of feedback. Likes are free but zaps signal more authenticity and probably keeps the bots at bay. Because itβs niche there is much more of a community feel - good vibes. Helping other accounts. Less toxicity. Looking forward to more.
A. "Minority fork" is a fine phrase βοΈ
B. I'm fine being a minority fork