Thread

Preparing my second video on the Standard Model, I'm realizing what a huge job I've taken on... if I want lots of people to understand what I'm saying. You can't really understand the Standard Model without some physics: special relativity quantum mechanics and some math: Hilbert spaces Lie groups My job will be to take this wonderful stuff, which I have spent my life on, and distill it down to its essence, while still keeping some substance. My current plan: I'll explain the basic ideas of quantum mechanics using the example of a qubit, i.e. the Hilbert space β„‚Β². I can use this to explain the concept of "spin" for a spin-1/2 particle like an electron, and the Lie group SU(2), which we use to say what happens when we turn an electron around. Then we'll have the infrastructure to talk about "isospin", which mathematically just like spin, but physically very different: it's connected to the weak force. Heisenberg invented isospin to understand why protons and neutrons were so similar, and could turn into each other. So, I need to find the best way to explain the basic ideas of quantum mechanics, qubits, SU(2), and rotations. That sounds like two separate videos.

Replies (6)

@npub1knzs...c73p I had a great time watching the first video and am looking forward to the next one(s)! Coming from a math perspective, and not knowing the SM well, I'm wondering at which point QM is needed. Or conversely, how much of the SM can be explained in classical terms, like principle bundles, their structure group, it's representations, connections, sections of associated bundles, an action functional, etc, without talking about quantisation (yet)?