Preparing my second video on the Standard Model, I'm realizing what a huge job I've taken on... if I want lots of people to understand what I'm saying.
You can't really understand the Standard Model without some physics:
special relativity
quantum mechanics
and some math:
Hilbert spaces
Lie groups
My job will be to take this wonderful stuff, which I have spent my life on, and distill it down to its essence, while still keeping some substance.
My current plan: I'll explain the basic ideas of quantum mechanics using the example of a qubit, i.e. the Hilbert space βΒ². I can use this to explain the concept of "spin" for a spin-1/2 particle like an electron, and the Lie group SU(2), which we use to say what happens when we turn an electron around.
Then we'll have the infrastructure to talk about "isospin", which mathematically just like spin, but physically very different: it's connected to the weak force. Heisenberg invented isospin to understand why protons and neutrons were so similar, and could turn into each other.
So, I need to find the best way to explain the basic ideas of quantum mechanics, qubits, SU(2), and rotations. That sounds like two separate videos.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (5)
@npub1knzs...c73p I had great time watching first video, thank you! Iβm looking forward to the next one. Canβt wait to see how bad my math is :D
@npub1knzs...c73p I had a great time watching the first video and am looking forward to the next one(s)!
Coming from a math perspective, and not knowing the SM well, I'm wondering at which point QM is needed. Or conversely, how much of the SM can be explained in classical terms, like principle bundles, their structure group, it's representations, connections, sections of associated bundles, an action functional, etc, without talking about quantisation (yet)?
@npub1knzs...c73p
I do hope you're going to explain this !


@npub1knzs...c73p Your first video was succinct and clear, at just the right level for me. I've sort of fractally absorbed most of this information over the years and having it just spelled out in good order is quite nice.
@npub1knzs...c73p Wow, just saw this, will watch part 1 soon (haven't yet). I had been wondering how much QFT I need to grok to have any understanding of the standard model. I guess I'll find out!