if there is an economic desire for these protocols to exist, the job of core devs is to make sure they do it in the least harmful way possible to decentralization. it's really that simple.
Thread
Login to reply
Replies ()
???
Absolutely not. There was economic desire to do everything that the shitcoins do and it was never the job of core to make that stuff happen either.
But also, even if it were the case. How do we measure the economic desire? We can't expect people to jump on board based on words and second hand observations.
If it really is that simple in your mind, then you must have some data?
Hearing one company say they will launch X is hardly data.
If this is all it takes then there is clear favouritism. They must be in favour of citrea specifically.
And IMO the data shouldn't come from entrepreneurs, it should come from the market. Until a product is launched, it is just an experiment. Let the entrepreneurs experiment and build a market and let that speak for why the nodes should change.
So who's desire is that exactly and how much do they pay you for their desires?
View quoted note →
So this is a business now.
Bitcoin is money. Core devs job is to keep Bitcoin safe and sound as money. Definitely not to support whatever people have a financial interest in doing. People have a financial interest in doing all kinds of things. Core devs job is to defend our money against all those financial interests that threaten Bitcoin's ability to function efficiently as money, now and in the future.
We definitely don't need to reproduce the fiat casino on Bitcoin.