Thread

Sats sounds good.

do it

What about “bits”. 1 bitcoin is 100,000,000 bits

Many people have great arguments to change the standard away from Sats but in the end Sats seems to be very sticky. IMO we need to embrace it as a standard as not to add even more confusion. But there should also be other alternatives in the settings. Bits should definitely be an alternative.

Stop it

It's sats, the community has decided. You could go with "bitcoinSATS" for the incoming n00bs. Depends why and where you want to change it though.

I don't like this idea, make confusion. Only bitcoin and satoshi.

Sats are standard, don't touch it.

pack that shit in.

You can do whatever you want but I am calling them sats.

Why? What would you call a bitcoin if sats are renamed bitcoins

no

Why do we even keep discussing this

Please don't. I use your software to onboard newbies. I don't need them thinking they are sending 21 bitcoins to my goats. Sats is it. You'll only introduce noise into the bitcoin memetic space and dilute your own brand in the process.

Juts put a Sats to Bitcoin converter... Just put a Sats to dollar/euro/x converter... That's it. Everybody will understand. "Sats" are the Lightning Network soul. Don't change the name.

Nah. Sats is sats. Stack sats. Send sats. Don't mess with sats. 😂

You take away my sats, you are dead to me, I would sooner lay you into this barren earth then entertain your folly for a moment longer. You will not have Bitcoin, you will not have bits, you will have sats! Thats final

Sats are the standard. Stay humble and stack them. Let this meme continue to catch on please. Yours faithfully, A Humble Sat-Stacker

Stupid. No need to explain. View quoted note →

Sats are fine, just keep stacking them... View quoted note →

"sats are confusing" "what would be less confusing is if we revalued an existing unit that the world has already accepted" lmfao insane

Bits. And use the kebab 😄

Sats is a dumb name, IMO, but it follows what we already know, such as dollars and cents. We've been able to figure that out. Zaps the standard.

Some men just want to watch the world burns

Would make #walletofsatoshi a fraud instantly because everybody new would think they can get Bitcoin for free. That would be the right answer to your question. How would that be than on #NOSTR Like: "Look dudes, @ODELL zapped me 42 bitcoins!" come on @Wallet of Satoshi I like your App but... seriously???

Bad idea. It is a homage to the creator and sending .00000001 bitcoin to someone is stupid

No no no

Bad idea...

ATROCIOUS. Singular "bitcoin" for the whole unit. "bitcoins" is Boomer shit no matter which level of denomination we're talking about. Plural "sats" for the fractional unit. It just sounds cool.

Peak development ideas in custodial lightning wallet land. Top fucking minds. View quoted note →

if this post by WoS doesnt end up trending on primal for good trolling then it will be clear that primal trends are as liberated as those on X View quoted note →

No Sir. 1BTC = 1BTC 1BTC > 1sat 😂

If this is 1... What is 2??! 🤔🤣

Sats are actually bitcoins But those with Adjustment Disorders like most older people with conservative values, and even younger ones with AS, HFA, or ASD have full-on adjustment disorders too and will react violently when faced with sudden, unwanted change so it's something to deal with, because only calmer minds make better decisions But bitcoins are literally, COINS The full amount should have been SATOSHI or to make it ungeneric-sounding, call it satomoto, satoshimo, whichever sounds nice

Nice troll guys

😂

highly regarded

Is this a joke? In case not, no!! definitely not... way too confusing!

imo Good idea in long term. there is no such thing as a whole bitcoin

No benefits. Only downsides. Why even have this idea?

I think people will look at Bitcoiners with confusion when they say "1 whole bitcoin = 100 million bitcoins"

The term bitcoin would ideally be applied to a unit with a sane value. As it stands a lot of people think of bitcoin as expensive when that is a completely arbitrary valuation. Right now 1 sat is too small to be the standard unit, and 1 bitcoin is too big. I think Adam Back has the right idea and in the near future we'll be pricing bitcoin by the bit (0.00000100 btc) and this will eventually become the unit that laypeople mean when they say bitcoin. Sometime around the point that 1 sat == $0.01. It's a logical transition for people to think of sats as cents and bits as dollars.

Hell no! is what I think. We don't need MORE confusion. We have enough with the "bitcoin the asset" and "Bitcoin the network" nonsense.

sats are sats - bitcoins are bitcoins so big hell no from urantia

No!

That ship has sailed IMHO. Sats it is.

Nostr and Lightning is the reason I dig Sats as a unit.

sats is better. in sankrit , sat mean truth, unchangeable..

The downside is no one can tell how much Bitcoin you are talking about. "Would you be interested in selling your car for two bitcoins?" The scammers will have so much fun with your idea.

I dig it. one tenth of any amount of gold is still gold. why would the same standard not apply to bitcoin?