True, but isnโt it a matter of definition? There is illegal speech that is not protected by the first amendment. Many forms of speech in the broad sense are criminalized and not tolerated by any society. So the question becomes where is the line drawn and how?
โhate speechโ is just speech you hate.
Oneโs particular emotional disposition has nothing to do with the principles keeping civilization upright.
You can tell me you hate it, but no one has to listen or care.
@Jordan Iโve made it easy for anyone who wants to connect with me privately to have a quick conversation. Please feel free to reach out to me directly through the SimpleX app using the link below,Iโll be glad to chat with you.
๐ฏ
Bondi is making a big mistake. If I understand her correctly, she means โviolence inciting speech.โ She should use precise language instead of using weaponized language.
No, he meant leftists, at first.
Or communists.
The left, maybe?
Oh I got it, all of the left.
Or was it The Leftists?
Dude is coding how he speaks to try and cover up what he's said. It's a different, moving target for every post so there is wiggle room for every argument. That's called smarm.
Semantics mean little to those who are really listening.
You should get your talking points straightened out.
Be sure to feed those edit and delete buttons, they're getting a workout I'm sure.
Againโฆ youโre not AI to take you at your word. We humans can understand the context, underlying meaning behind the words. Most right wingers hide behind right usage of words, precise speech etc.
The Bible makes clear that hatred comes in many forms. But it also warns: Do not answer hatred with hatred (1 Meqabyan 2:1โ2), nor take up the sword against your brother, for vengeance belongs to the Lord alone (Romans 12:19). The one who refuses mercy destroys his own soul (Sirach 28:1โ2), and the man who becomes a shooter in wrath will perish by the very violence he has chosen (Testament of Benjamin 7:5).
Everyone thats trying to dox, cancel or whatever else for something they donโt agree with need to remember why most run a NYM. Every retard is allowed to say whatever they feel like EXCEPT direct threats of violence.
... and if you insist hate speech does exist, sinoly enter dialog & speak against it. If for no other reason than it is more effective at getting your ideas across than violence, be it state actuated violence or otherwise
View quoted note โ
... and if you insist hate speech does exist, simply enter dialog & speak against it. If for no other reason than it is more effective at getting your ideas across than violence, be it state actuated violence or otherwise
View quoted note โ
I don't think taking advice from an evil man is the way to go here ๐ซ
Americans take free speech to an extreme level sometimes and I'm not talking about valid criticism but actually just hate towards others and then wrapping it up as if 'oh it's free speech'
โWords arenโt harmfulโฆโ. Nonsense. If they cannot be harmful, why do they frequently result into violent actions, which when cumulated harm the community? Hurtful words and gestures -> violence -> public unrest -> social norms -> public lawsโฆ the causality should be clear enough alright. Even if you donโt like the last part, interference by a central governance, there is a need for social norms incl. their enforcement.