Please recommend 29, not 28. 29 enables zero-fee-commitments for lightning, which is a really important feature in some cases!
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (3)
I have a question, is v30 the final decision by core team?
Enjoy your irrelevancy, pathetic stooge shill
Not sure most people are aware of the benefits (I'm not).
My understanding is that the commitment transaction is basically the transactions you are "passing around" with the other side of a lightning channel, your updates to the "bar tab". There is an issue that if these are too old, when you try to force close a channel, it fails because the fee to the miner is too low, so we need a mechanism for either side to bump the fee.
If this is correct, can you complete it with why is it important to support zero fee commitments and what exactly do they solve? (Or share a link 🙂)