Profile

Did some work on @npub1n6vc...0963 this weekend. I was trying to figure out why it sometimes failed to post. I never did, but I did manage to break it and then fix it (hopefully?). At least now it should not get confused and double post if something goes wrong.

So it begins ... The partial lunar eclipse from Baltimore, Maryland. #LunarEclipse #TotalLunarEclipse

I've been reading some old astronomy papers (as one does on a Saturday night), and was surprised to come across the term "extragalactic nebula" to describe a galaxy in a paper written in 1941. The famous "great debate" took place in 1920, with Harlow Shapley arguing that the "spiral nebulae" were within the Milky Way and Heber Curtis arguing that they were distant "island universes". Edwin Hubble solved this debate once and for all in 1929, by measuring the distances to several spiral nebulae like Andromeda and Triangulum, and showing they were too far away to be within the Milky Way. So then, why were astronomers still referring to these things as nebulae into the 1940s? 1/

Day 2 #AAS245 Dave Pooley had the first plenary lecture: From the Smallest Things to the Greatest Results — The Incredible Power of the Chandra X-ray Observatory In addition to giving us some history, this talk made the case for Chandra science, and its continued importance in the face of possible mission-ending budget cuts.

More from #AAS245 Day 1 Alexandra Pope's Plenary Lecture: Galaxy Evolution Eras Tour: The Formative Years of Star Formation and Supermassive Black Hole Growth. Early era – star formation is “bursty” Cosmic noon - steady star formation is the formative era After that, the growth rates decline The back hole accretion rate over time seems to correspond with the star formation rate, but the samples are pulled from different galaxies. Is this trend real?