Lessons From The Longest-Living Among Us Lessons From The Longest-Living Among Us (emphasis ours), Sister Pacis Bao spent 31 years longing for revenge against the communists who murdered her family—then made a decision at age 79 that may have added 25 years to her life. The 104-year-old nun turned from hatred to forgiveness, which put her mind and body at ease. image Bao is thriving as part of the fastest-growing demographic worldwide: centenarians—people who live past 100. Life expectancy is generally on the rise, with one in six people worldwide age 60 and over—a rate expected to double by 2050, according to the World Health Organization. Among older adults, those who reach 80 and whose cognitive and physical abilities exceed typical age-related decline are called “superagers.” Sue Wright, a 98-year-old Midwestern woman with little in common with Bao, is also thriving as a superager. The two women are quietly practicing the very insight researchers are racing to understand—what helps humans thrive beyond 100. Aim for Goldilocks Sleep Both women maintain consistent sleep schedules. Bao goes to sleep by 8 p.m. every night, wakes at 5 a.m., and rests every afternoon—a rhythm that reflects best-practice data and her own needs. Wright follows a similar pattern. Their routines reflect what researchers call “Goldilocks sleep”—not too much, not too little, and of good quality. Sleeping less than seven hours a night has been associated with a 14 percent increased risk of all-cause mortality, according to a published in GeroScience. The biological effects are significant: chronic low-grade inflammation, impaired immune function, hormonal imbalances, increased blood pressure, and reduced clearance of proteins linked to Alzheimer’s disease. “While this study focused on sleep duration, sleep quality is another critical factor influencing mortality risk,” the authors wrote. They added that poor sleep—marked by frequent wake-ups and restless nights—has been linked to heart problems, memory decline, and other brain disorders. Maintain a Healthy Weight Bao has never been overweight, though she indulges in potstickers and egg rolls on occasion, and enjoys a few bites of ice cream after dinner. Wright, who weighs 119 pounds now, never weighed more than 130 pounds outside of her two pregnancies. Being overweight or obese is associated with all causes of mortality, even among those who never smoked or had chronic disease, according to a https://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140-6736(16)30175-1/fulltext published in JAMA found that people who gained more than 66 pounds between early and middle adulthood had higher rates of heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, and obesity-related cancer. The authors noted that while people and their doctors often dismiss excess weight gain in midlife, it has serious longevity implications. A https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/fulltext/2019/10180/the_association_between_weight_fluctuation_and.32.aspx of 15 studies published in Medicine found that weight fluctuations elevate the risk of all-cause mortality, lending credibility to the scale as a way to monitor and maintain a healthy weight. Flex Your Brain Just as weight can begin causing problems before the golden years, so can issues like memory, attention, and perception. “Longitudinal studies have shown that midlife is a critical period for the beginning of the pathology of cognitive disorders,” wrote the authors of a . on successful aging published in Acta Biomedica. They noted that frequent use of memory and attention, as well as challenging the brain in other ways, may explain why some older people experience higher cognitive functioning. Those who enjoy a range of brain-stimulating activities—reading, writing, and playing games—across their lifetimes may prevent the onset and progression of Alzheimer’s disease, a leading cause of death worldwide, according to a https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/1149704?utm_source published in JAMA Neurology. Both Bao and Wright have kept active schedules, even after stopping 9-to-5 work, and keeping busy hands. They read, play games, and help others in need. They also both surround themselves with a positive social circle—another factor that can protect the brain. A published in Alzheimer’s Dementia found that those with strong midlife relationships had a lower dementia risk compared to those with poor relationships. Flex Your Muscles, Too Centenarians don’t need to lift weights, though retaining muscle mass leads to better heart function, mobility, and balance, and prevents Type 2 diabetes. An about the blue zones noted that the world’s longest-living people often move because of necessity, fun, and function. They grow gardens, don’t rely on mechanical conveniences, and accumulate thousands of steps each day without a formal plan or tracking. Wright grew up playing basketball and baseball with her brothers, golfed regularly as an adult, and was even spotted dancing without her walker at the assisted living home where she moved a year ago after a COVID-19 infection left her with leg weakness. “We used to go dancing all the time—went every weekend,” she said, smiling at the memory. Fill Your Calendar Wright’s dancing came with a lot of socializing—another hallmark of longevity. A robust social life ranked right behind good health when surveyed adults described what successful aging means to them. The https://academic.oup.com/gerontologist/article/55/1/91/574083 were reported in The Gerontologist The adults pointed to having friends and family, feeling supported, not being lonely, participating in social activities, and being involved with younger generations. While Wright misses her neighborhood friends, she is enjoying regular company and staying active in her assisted living community. “I like everyone here. It’s nice to be around people you can visit with,” she said. “I do like to help others when they need help, too.” Wright will soon be moving to a new state to be close to her son and other family. Her nieces are already planning a party for her 100th birthday. Don’t Dwell on Your Age Aging isn’t just an ongoing celebration. Wright has outlived two husbands and all of her friends, and suffered through the loss of a son when he was age 3. “You think a lot about it and wonder why, but you have to accept losses and go on with life,” she said. “You just have to cope with it and try not to think about it, because we all have to go.” Accepting aging and dying are important to living a fulfilled life, according to about one-quarter of participants in the successful aging survey. While many said reaching 80 and beyond was a lofty goal, some noted it’s important not to wish to be young again or to view aging as a punishment. Take It Easy Overthinking aging—or anything, for that matter—increases stress, and stress is linked to numerous diseases. The solution: regularly find a way to relax both emotionally and physically. Although everyone experiences stress, the world’s longest-lived people have routines to shed that stress, wrote Dan Buettner and Sam Skemp, authors of the blue zones article. “Okinawans take a few moments each day to remember their ancestors; Adventists pray; Ikarians take a nap; and Sardinians do happy hour.” In addition to praying, Bao draws and paints hummingbirds and flowers. Her hand isn’t as steady as it used to be, but that doesn’t matter. Not only does it improve her mood to make them, but it also delights her to give away her creations. “Sometimes the people, they need cheer,” she said, adding that she likes to bless the staff at the convent. “They take good care of us, and we are sure grateful.” Disease Can’t Always Be Avoided Aging trends have spurred interest and research in centenarians—often considered models of aging well because they’ve managed to delay disease. Within the demographic, however, some are long-suffering with disease, while others seem to avoid disease altogether. Researchers categorize centenarians as: Escapers: About 15 percent who show no sign of disease at age 100. Survivors: About 42 percent who had disease before reaching age 80. Delayers: About 43 percent who had no age-related diseases until reaching age 80 or beyond. Wright has kidney disease and struggles to drink enough water. She’s lost some weight and said that while she'd like to live to 100, she doesn’t plan to undergo dialysis treatments if her condition advances. Bao moved from the independent wing of her convent to be near the nurse’s station two years ago—but not because she’s ill. The oldest resident, Bao figured it only made sense, though a convent administrator said she’s the healthiest of the residents. Despite the rapid increase in centenarians, reaching 100 remains rare. There are about 2.6 per 10,000 people in the United States, up from 2.1 in 2020 and 1.42 in 1980. “Day by day, Jesus is always the same to me, giving me extra help,” Bao said. “I say to myself every day when I get up, ‘I’m grateful, and today’s going to be a good day.’” Fri, 11/07/2025 - 22:35
New Mexico Is The State Most Dependent On Food Stamps New Mexico Is The State Most Dependent On Food Stamps The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest federal food assistance initiative in the U.S., supporting roughly one in eight Americans. The program helps low-income households purchase groceries, with monthly benefits averaging around https://www.fmi.org/blog/view/fmi-blog/2025/04/17/the-snap-program-is-important-and-can-be-even-more-efficient  nationwide. This visualization, . image New Mexico Leads in SNAP Dependence New Mexico stands out as the most SNAP-dependent state, with 21.5% of residents receiving assistance, nearly double the national average. The average monthly benefit there is $176.51 per person, totaling over $80 million in monthly aid. Persistent poverty rates and rural isolation help explain the state’s high reliance on federal food assistance. Oregon follows closely at 18.1% enrollment, while Louisiana ranks third at 17.5%. In each case, elevated unemployment and cost pressures have contributed to continued demand for benefits. Coastal and Urban States See Higher Benefit Amounts States like New York ($218.44), Massachusetts ($215.64), and Hawaii ($361.78) report some of the highest average benefits per person. These higher payments reflect steeper living costs in dense urban and island economies. Rank State Population with SNAP Avg benefit per person Number of beneficiaries Total monthly benefits 1 New Mexico 21.5% $176.51 457,699 $80,790,060 2 Oregon 18.1% $182.17 772,893 $140,797,421 3 Louisiana 17.5% $186.90 803,988 $150,268,544 4 Oklahoma 16.9% $186.85 692,477 $129,386,266 5 W. Virginia 15.5% $167.74 273,566 $45,886,908 6 Nevada 15.2% $171.80 496,848 $85,360,880 7 Massachusetts 15.1% $215.64 1,076,187 $232,066,810 8 Pennsylvania 15.0% $181.70 1,958,047 $355,777,154 9 New York 14.9% $218.44 2,962,913 $647,210,404 10 Illinois 14.8% $195.94 1,879,564 $368,278,250 11 Michigan 14.5% $175.44 1,473,832 $258,575,524 12 Alabama 14.3% $193.08 736,178 $142,142,795 13 California 13.9% $190.25 5,494,318 $1,045,310,679 14 Kentucky 13.0% $178.94 595,155 $106,498,834 15 Rhode Island 12.8% $200.95 142,726 $28,680,737 16 Florida 12.6% $181.97 2,943,012 $535,551,777 17 North Carolina 12.5% $174.75 1,378,291 $240,858,724 18 Ohio 12.2% $186.03 1,450,955 $269,917,495 19 Georgia 12.1% $186.08 1,356,493 $252,417,633 20 Mississippi 12.1% $180.46 357,042 $64,432,174 21 Arizona 11.7% $182.25 887,253 $161,705,602 22 Maine 11.6% $176.55 163,520 $28,869,975 23 Wisconsin 11.6% $163.89 689,315 $112,973,934 24 Washington 11.4% $184.51 905,471 $167,068,578 25 Hawaii 11.3% $361.78 163,576 $59,178,123 26 Delaware 11.2% $180.54 118,209 $21,340,950 27 Texas 11.0% $177.82 3,455,085 $614,386,464 28 Maryland 10.7% $182.49 667,981 $121,902,010 29 Missouri 10.5% $196.10 655,940 $128,629,589 30 South Carolina 10.4% $186.42 567,895 $105,867,349 31 Colorado 10.3% $195.97 614,843 $120,493,408 32 Vermont 10.0% $188.75 64,633 $12,199,424 33 Connecticut 9.9% $192.89 363,524 $70,118,853 34 Tennessee 9.6% $203.20 690,545 $140,318,213 35 Virginia 9.4% $173.84 824,866 $143,392,688 36 Alaska 9.0% $364.31 66,377 $24,181,479 37 New Jersey 8.7% $194.63 826,094 $160,778,766 38 Indiana 8.5% $195.71 586,403 $114,763,019 39 Iowa 8.2% $169.04 267,158 $45,159,537 40 South Dakota 8.1% $198.24 75,282 $14,923,544 41 Minnesota 7.8% $158.45 451,966 $71,616,027 42 Arkansas 7.8% $172.82 239,748 $41,434,391 43 Nebraska 7.5% $181.00 150,600 $27,258,920 44 North Dakota 7.2% $174.33 57,129 $9,959,141 45 Montana 7.1% $170.68 80,523 $13,743,731 46 Idaho 6.7% $179.01 133,545 $23,906,189 47 Kansas 6.3% $177.23 186,036 $32,971,957 48 New Hampshire 5.4% $169.56 75,717 $12,838,748 49 Utah 5.1% $192.17 177,087 $34,030,139 50 Wyoming 4.6% $183.81 27,122 $4,985,385 In contrast, benefits tend to be smaller in lower-cost Midwestern states such as Wisconsin ($163.89) and Minnesota ($158.45), where overall food prices and housing costs are lower. Low Participation in Western States Wyoming has the lowest SNAP participation rate at just 4.6%, followed by Utah (5.1%) and New Hampshire (5.4%). Still, even in these states, food stamps remains a crucial safety net for tens of thousands of residents. Utah alone distributes more than $34 million in benefits each month to about 177,000 people. If you enjoyed today’s post, check out   on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist. Fri, 11/07/2025 - 22:10
Trump's Unpredictability Keeps Beijing Off Balance: Analysts Trump's Unpredictability Keeps Beijing Off Balance: Analysts (emphasis ours), Since day one in office, President Donald Trump has taken Beijing on a roller coaster ride of tariffs and export controls. For a regime that is already struggling with a stagnant economy and an international market increasingly wary of Chinese dumping, Trump’s actions have added an extra layer of uncertainty. image Both sides went through multiple rounds of escalation and de-escalation. Last month, they a tentative one-year truce. Tariff levels are down—overall about on U.S. goods. China will pause its extensive rare earth export control, curb the flow of fentanyl precursor chemicals into the United States, and will also buy soybeans from American farmers. In return, the United States will suspend its port fees on Chinese ships and the 50 percent rule—barring exports to any companies owned 50 percent or more by entities on the restricted list. Before the Trump-Xi meeting on Oct. 30, China’s Minister of Foreign Affairs China’s development is “parallel and not contradictory to” Trump’s “Make America Great Again” campaign. Coping with Trump’s unpredictability is challenging for Beijing, said Dennis Wilder, a former senior U.S. national security official on China affairs who served under both Republican and Democratic presidents. “It was interesting how Xi Jinping flattered Trump this time, and I haven’t heard him flatter an American president before,” Wilder told The Epoch Times. “That was quite striking, and it shows that the Chinese are a little scared of Trump and the fact that he doesn’t play by the traditional rules.” Alexander Campbell, a global macro investor, estimated that due to the property crisis, China’s banks need a lifeline of $1 trillion each year, which is supported by its trade surplus of the same size. Therefore, he thinks the importance of exports to the regime and the threat of high tariff rates are underappreciated. He previously worked as the head of commodities at U.S. investment management firm Bridgewater Associates. In his view, Trump’s volatile approach forced China to reveal its hand in rare earths, creating a sense of urgency for the United States to achieve supply chain independence. Chaos as Strategy According to game theory, unpredictability is what the stronger player in a competitive situation wants, said Campbell. He added that the weaker player in this case needs predictability for central planning—making unpredictability an existential threat to the authoritarian regime. “Trump is playing what we call a mixed strategy like a poker player, where you don’t know when they’re going to bluff or call, and you don’t know when they have a good hand or a bad hand,” Campbell told The Epoch Times. “And that’s explicitly how he approaches negotiations and how he approaches these kinds of competitive dynamics.” It all goes back to “ ,” the macro investor said, when Trump “separated friends from enemies.” On April 2, Trump imposed reciprocal tariffs on nearly all countries, including China. Many came to the table to negotiate with the United States; China was among the few that retaliated. A key vulnerability of China is that it wants to appear strong, Campbell said; therefore, through several rounds of escalations, China revealed its best card: rare earths. Beijing’s on the critical minerals essential for modern manufacturing, from cars and electronics to advanced weapon systems, underscores the strategic importance of rare earths in the global economy. On Oct. 9, China announced that it would restrict exports of any rare earth products containing 0.1 percent or more of Chinese rare earth content or manufactured using Chinese technology. “They overplayed it, because what they did was, instead of keeping this bilateral, they made it global. And they scared the whole world by these new restrictions that were supposed to go into place at the end of the year,” said Wilder. “And that just brings everybody over to the U.S. side. I think that was a big mistake by the Chinese. They should have kept it bilateral.” In Campbell’s view, Trump baited China into using its rare earth card, showing the world that if China would use it as leverage for tariffs, it could also use it on other issues. Through Beijing’s actions, the pain of being subject to what the Chinese call a “rare-earth chokepoint” has become real. Alexander Campbell sees the sense of urgency created by China’s actions as a catalyst for the United States to act swiftly and decisively. “I think the West is actually very good at solving acute problems when they are actually perceived as acute,” he added. “Operation Warp Speed on rare earths would not have been possible in January.” Closing Rare-Earth Vulnerability Aside from meeting with Xi in South Korea, Trump also toured several Asian countries and reached framework agreements related to rare earths, including with Japan and Malaysia. The president also a deal with Australia before his trip to Asia for greater access to Australia’s reserves and infrastructure. Ian Lange, a professor at the Colorado School of Mines and an expert on critical minerals, told The Epoch Times that he believes the agreements with other countries are beneficial. Still, he thinks the U.S. domestic efforts are sufficient to achieve rare-earth self-reliance within two years. Australian company Lynas Rare Earths Ltd. owns a refinery of heavy rare earth elements in Malaysia, the only one in the world that is not controlled by the Chinese, said Lange. And collaboration with Japan, a technology powerhouse, will also help, the professor said. In addition, he said recycled rare earths could meet 20 percent of the U.S. market demand, and more deals like the one the Department of War with Las Vegas-based MP Materials would be forthcoming. The Pentagon guaranteed a minimum floor price for the products and a minimum profit for MP’s new magnet factory. On Oct. 24, Brazilian company Aclara Resources Inc. that it would build a refinery for heavy rare earths in Louisiana. Construction is expected to be finished by the end of 2027. Trump has  that the United States could end its dependency on Chinese rare earths within the next 18 months. These critical minerals are going to drive the future competition between a market economy led by the United States and a non-market economy led by China, according to Yeh Yao-Yuan, professor of political science and international studies at the University of St. Thomas. How Trump will persuade other countries to produce rare earths despite the high pollution in the refinery process will be key to watch throughout his term, Yeh told The Epoch Times. What’s Next? The professor at the University of St. Thomas said he thinks China will continue to use the rare earth card as a weapon, whether to counter U.S. tensions, pressure Taiwan, or distract Chinese people from domestic economic troubles. But if China drags on, he said, it will lose because the Chinese market isn’t as large as the U.S. market and has less capacity to withstand negative impacts. “What if one day overcapacity applies to rare earths as well?” he asked. “When other countries don’t need Chinese rare earths, what else does China have to hold the rest of the world captive?” Wilder concurs. Rare earth is the “best card” China has, he said, but the United States has other cards, such as high-tech restrictions and financial sanctions. The current U.S.-China relations hang in a delicate balance. Wilder sees the truce as a “tactical pause” with pending details. He said the discussed reciprocal state visits—Trump visiting China in April and Chinese leader Xi Jinping coming to the United States later in the fall—“help keep the trade war on pause.” “There are expectations on both sides, and if they’re not met, it could spiral again. Trump could delay his trip to Beijing because he doesn’t have to go in April.” Fri, 11/07/2025 - 21:45
Nearly One In Five Americans Still Work From Home Regularly Nearly One In Five Americans Still Work From Home Regularly Many companies, particularly among the finance and tech sectors, have started calling employees back to the office. Firms such as Microsoft have announced expectations for workers to spend more time on-site, while Amazon has gone further, requiring employees to return to the office five days a week. , around one in five U.S. adults currently work from home on a regular basis. You will find more infographics at This share has remained relatively stable since 2022, when Statista first began tracking the trend. However,   is not the most common arrangement. image As shown in Statista’s recent findings, 43 percent of respondents said they regularly work in their company's office, while 16 percent reported working primarily in factories or production facilities. Fri, 11/07/2025 - 21:20
Americans Are Increasingly Alone, But Are They Really Lonely? Americans Are Increasingly Alone, But Are They Really Lonely? , In 2023, then-U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy released a bombshell report, “📄.pdf ,” that painted a bleak picture of citizens feeling “isolated, invisible, and insignificant.” Most provocatively, it stated that perhaps half of Americans face a personal crisis of aloneness that poses health risks “similar to that caused by smoking up to 15 cigarettes a day.” image The report received wide attention as it resonated with myriad data points – including declining marriage and birth rates and the rise of remote work – showing Americans are spending less face time with one another. But a RealClearInvestigations inquiry has found that its warnings of a loneliness epidemic are unsupported and that its claims of severe health risks stem from a misreading of the data.  The University of Rochester’s Viji Kannan, whom Murthy partly relied on for his claims of a loneliness increase, told RCI her study focused on measurable declines in social connections and not more subjective feelings of loneliness. “YES!” she said in an email. “Loneliness is a different thing.”  Daniel Cox at the American Enterprise Institute, whose research on loneliness was also cited by the surgeon general, had a similar take. He told RCI, “The evidence more strongly supports an epidemic of ‘aloneness’ rather than loneliness. We are spending more time by ourselves.”  Hans IJzerman, who studies loneliness at the University of Oxford, concurred. “The biggest story may be how the surgeon general basically butchered the narrative by not relying on solid data,” he said. Murthy, who now works outside of government, did not respond to request for comment. The Department of Health and Human Services, which still posts the loneliness report on its website, declined to comment, citing the government shutdown. Critics say the former surgeon general’s questionable assertion of a loneliness epidemic – – reflects a larger pattern whereby science is invoked to make larger arguments about American culture. These include claims that systemic racism is a public health crisis or that technologies such as cell phones are increasing rates of depression, anxiety, and other mental health issues among teens. These assertions take kernels of truth – racism exists, mental health problems were on the rise until the last few years – and then attach them to specific causes to add a patina of scientific credibility. The alleged loneliness epidemic seems to stem in part from concerns over how technology in particular may be enabling people to choose to spend more time by themselves – which can seem counter to democratic ideas of community – and from a conflation of two very different phenomena: loneliness and being alone. Being alone is not the same thing as being lonely, and research shows social obligations in heavy doses can be as stressful for many as they are supportive.  https://phys.org/news/2023-11-loneliness.html are less likely to feel lonely when not around others. More Time Alone A wealth of data suggests that Americans are spending more time by themselves. The surgeon general’s advisory, for example, pointed to slow declines in family and friend engagement during the early 2000s, though the most serious drop-offs occurred after the COVID-19 pandemic due to lockdowns and social distancing. More people are forgoing marriage and parenthood. We have fewer close friends. More Americans live alone than ever before, partly because we’re living longer.  Source: National Vital Statistics, US Census Bureau and American Community Survey, and previous work by According to as of 2018. Remote work, already slowly increasing, skyrocketed after the pandemic. Whether this is bad or not is debatable, given people seem eager enough for it. While these trends are clear, their meaning and effect are harder to pinpoint. Even though people are alone more often, data for the period 2003-2019 shows a very small decline in social connection. Professor Kannan calculated that time spent with others declined by about 146 hours per year, or about 1.7% – a relatively slight decrease that hardly seems reflective of an epidemic.  That period was, of course, also marked by the rise of smartphones and social media, forcing researchers to ask new questions about connectivity: Is aloneness defined by physical proximity? If someone is playing Dungeons and Dragons online with friends all over the world, are they truly alone? Loneliness By the Numbers Loneliness is, of course, a common and universal human trait. It is a subjective feeling of unwanted aloneness that is accompanied by a sense of social emptiness. A connection is desired but missing. Feeling lonely from time to time is not a sign of a problem. Loneliness becomes a clinically relevant issue when it is chronic and becomes a precursor for persistent distress and dissatisfaction with life.  Tracking loneliness over time can be trickier than time spent alone, perhaps one reason why so many conversations about loneliness seem to subtly shift to time spent alone instead. There appear to be few high-quality datasets tracking subjective loneliness over time. Though https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2022-09577-002 of the evidence put it, “There is an epidemic of headlines that claim we are experiencing a loneliness epidemic, but there is no empirical support for the fact that loneliness is increasing, let alone spreading at epidemic rates.” As Bad as Smoking? One of the surgeon general’s more dramatic claims was that “lacking social connection is as deadly as smoking up to 15 cigarettes a day.”  This comparison appears to come straight from the research of Professor Julianne Holt-Lunstad at Brigham Young University, who was the lead science editor on the surgeon general’s report. However, this comparison appears to be for light smoking (defined as 15 cigarettes or less per day). Had comparisons been made with medium (15-25 cigarettes) or heavy smoking (25+ cigarettes), smoking would clearly come out far more dangerous.  Further, the impact of smoking is pretty direct … lung cancer, heart attacks, strokes. Loneliness’s impact on mortality is clear. It could involve everything from more stress to fewer people around to help with medical issues. Causal claims are also tricky, given the degree to which the evidence relies on self-report correlational studies of subjective loneliness, associating it with mortality. In some cases, prolonged illness could prompt social abandonment, which would cause loneliness. Using correlational data to suggest that loneliness is causing illness is fraught, but that did not stop the surgeon general. While Holt-Lunstad declined to address RCI’s questions about the surgeon general’s use of her study, her co-author, University of Arizona Professor David Sbarra, expressed some unease with the epidemic framing. “In terms of a loneliness epidemic, I think I am more skeptical than most…demographic changes that would establish an epidemic are really challenging,” he told RCI. “I think loneliness can spread through social networks…but what are the best data that loneliness and social disconnection are increasing? It's quite equivocal, in my opinion.”  There is little disagreement that loneliness is bad and can be associated with declining health. This may be because the distress of loneliness can cause stress and related health problems such as high blood pressure. But also because close social connections can help people with their medications and medical complications.  It’s less clear that, if the prevalence of loneliness has risen, it’s risen dramatically or that simple interpretations of loneliness = health risk are warranted. IJzerman, who is also CEO of Annecy Behavioral Science Lab and an expert on loneliness, has been critical of the way Kannan’s data was used by the surgeon general. IJzerman https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/misnomers-modern-malaise-stop-calling-loneliness-qpsrc/ that trends regarding time spent alone don’t tap into subjective loneliness and may be due to changes in how questions are asked over time. Further, they may simply reflect more people using technology for social interaction, which isn’t necessarily bad. IJzerman suggested we tend to get distracted by vanishingly small time trends and a tendency to look for technology to blame, such as social media or smartphones. Instead, we should be more concerned with the structural barriers some people face regarding social connection, for example, older adults and lower-income individuals.   Children and Loneliness Much attention has focused on the world of teens. Buffeted by COVID-19 lockdowns, with increasingly structured lives, and navigating new technology worlds, legitimate concerns have been raised about teen loneliness. Though some studies have suggested an increasing loneliness trend among youth, IJzerman has said they are https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/missing-measure-why-claims-social-media-v9qhc/ . He has critiqued these studies as “mining noise,” saying, “We cannot afford to base our understanding of loneliness on the psychological equivalent of wetted fingers in the wind.”  IJzerman also noted the difficulties of measuring loneliness across various cultures, as some studies have done. “While measuring loneliness across different societies might seem as simple as translating a questionnaire, the reality is far more complex. A Dutch student's understanding of loneliness may differ fundamentally from their British peer's interpretation, shaped by distinct cultural norms and social expectations. Even within the same country, temporal shifts in social attitudes can dramatically affect responses - as stigma around loneliness waxes and wanes, respondents' willingness to acknowledge these feelings may change accordingly.” While arguing that our difficulty in measuring loneliness should give society pause – especially when it comes to advancing specific policies as a response – he also noted that our current concerns around technology have a long lineage. “Socrates warned that writing would erode memory and authentic dialogue; the printing press faced condemnation for encouraging solitary reading over community gatherings; early telephones were criticized for disrupting social norms; television was blamed for isolating families. Even mundane innovations like heating stoves faced resistance for disrupting traditional communal practices. Time has generally proven these fears exaggerated, suggesting we should approach current concerns about social media with similar careful skepticism.”  This doesn’t mean we should dismiss all concerns about loneliness.  Whether subjective loneliness has declined or people have simply changed how they interact with others remains something of an open question.  Whatever is occurring, it does not appear that changes in technology are central, so we might look to the breakdowns in institutions, reduced marriages, problems with schools, etc.   Our difficulty seems to be that our national conversation can occur in only two modes. Either something is a crisis, or it is not worth talking about at all. Perhaps in having a more nuanced understanding of loneliness concerns, we could begin to appreciate that some issues are still worthy of consideration even if they are not a 5-alarm fire. Christopher J. Ferguson is a professor of psychology at Stetson University in Florida and author of "Catastrophe! The Psychology of Why Good People Make Bad Situations Worse." Fri, 11/07/2025 - 20:55
North Dakota & Texas Saw The Greatest GDP Growth Of US States Over The Past 35 Years, Louisiana The Least North Dakota & Texas Saw The Greatest GDP Growth Of US States Over The Past 35 Years, Louisiana The Least The 1990s were a different time. Dial-up internet, gas costing a dollar, and many states still leaning on manufacturing. Even then, new tech clusters and improved drilling methods were starting to reshape the map, setting up today’s energy-rich and tech-focused states for the strongest economies. The visualization, https://www.visualcapitalist.com/gdp-growth-by-u-s-state-map-1990-2024 ranks all 50 states and the District of Columbia by inflation-adjusted GDP growth between 1998–2024. image Data for real GDP growth by U.S. state is sourced from https://apps.bea.gov/itable/?ReqID=70&step=1#eyJhcHBpZCI6NzAsInN0ZXBzIjpbMSwyOSwyNSwzMSwyNiwyNywzMF0sImRhdGEiOltbIlRhYmxlSWQiLCI2MDAiXSxbIk1ham9yX0FyZWEiLCIwIl0sWyJTdGF0ZSIsWyIwIl1dLFsiQXJlYSIsWyJYWCJdXSxbIlN0YXRpc3RpYyIsWyIxIl1dLFsiVW5pdF9vZl9tZWFzdXJlIiwiTGV2ZWxzIl0sWyJZZWFyIixbIi0xIl1dLFsiWWVhckJlZ2luIiwiLTEiXSxbIlllYXJfRW5kIiwiLTEiXV19 . ℹ️ Real GDP growth measured from chained 2017 dollars. America’s Shale Boom in One Map North Dakota’s economy more than doubled thanks to the Bakken shale boom, which lifted its real output by 164%—twice the U.S. average. Texas, already the nation’s largest oil-producing state, followed closely with 141% growth. Rank State State Code GDP Growth (1998–2024) CAGR 2024 GDP (Billions) 1 North Dakota ND 164% 3.8% $80,058 2 Utah UT 157% 3.7% $299,471 3 Idaho ID 144% 3.5% $129,018 4 Texas TX 141% 3.4% $2,769,766 5 Washington WA 134% 3.3% $856,014 6 Arizona AZ 126% 3.2% $570,089 7 Colorado CO 117% 3.0% $557,633 8 California CA 115% 3.0% $4,048,108 9 Florida FL 113% 3.0% $1,726,710 10 Oregon OR 102% 2.7% $330,250 11 Nevada NV 102% 2.7% $269,011 12 South Dakota SD 101% 2.7% $76,796 13 Nebraska NE 96% 2.6% $189,243 14 Montana MT 93% 2.6% $78,441 15 North Carolina NC 89% 2.5% $844,209 16 Massachusetts MA 87% 2.4% $778,523 17 Georgia GA 85% 2.4% $881,508 18 South Carolina SC 84% 2.4% $357,074 19 Oklahoma OK 83% 2.4% $263,695 20 Tennessee TN 83% 2.3% $561,201 21 Virginia VA 81% 2.3% $761,734 22 New Mexico NM 76% 2.2% $147,085 23 Maryland MD 74% 2.2% $546,028 24 New Hampshire NH 73% 2.1% $119,337 25 Iowa IA 71% 2.1% $265,795 26 Minnesota MN 68% 2.0% $507,688 27 New York NY 65% 2.0% $2,322,139 28 District of Columbia DC 65% 1.9% $184,298 29 Arkansas AR 64% 1.9% $188,340 30 Vermont VT 63% 1.9% $46,276 31 Maine ME 62% 1.9% $99,174 32 Kansas KS 61% 1.9% $230,522 33 Wyoming WY 60% 1.8% $51,498 34 Alabama AL 59% 1.8% $325,345 35 Indiana IN 58% 1.8% $519,517 36 Hawaii HI 56% 1.7% $117,627 37 Wisconsin WI 53% 1.6% $453,299 38 Delaware DE 51% 1.6% $110,972 39 Pennsylvania PA 50% 1.6% $1,007,874 40 New Jersey NJ 47% 1.5% $846,000 41 Kentucky KY 44% 1.4% $295,375 42 Missouri MO 42% 1.4% $448,714 43 Illinois IL 41% 1.3% $1,148,106 44 Rhode Island RI 40% 1.3% $80,381 45 Ohio OH 39% 1.3% $923,141 46 Alaska AK 39% 1.3% $71,567 47 Mississippi MS 36% 1.2% $158,192 48 Connecticut CT 35% 1.2% $356,835 49 West Virginia WV 34% 1.1% $106,475 50 Michigan MI 30% 1.0% $702,467 51 Louisiana LA 23% 0.8% $329,173 N/A U.S. USA 81% 2.3% $29,298,013 New Mexico and Oklahoma also landed in the top 20. Cheap feedstock, rising exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG), and associated midstream build-out helped these states capture much of the value created by soaring U.S. energy production. ℹ️ Related: New Mexico overtook North Dakota as the https://www.visualcapitalist.com/mapped-u-s-oil-production-by-state-2/  U.S. state. Tech & Tourism Hubs Sustain Rapid Expansion Utah (+157%), Idaho (+144%), and Washington (+134%) show how a diversified tech sector can supercharge state-level GDP. Microsoft’s cloud push, Idaho’s semiconductor fabs, and Utah’s “Silicon Slopes” collectively fostered high-wage job growth and attracted inbound migration. Even the giant economies of California (+115%) and Florida (+113%) managed to outpace the national average rate of GDP growth by U.S. states. This shows how tech and professional-services clusters spill over into broader economic activity. Rust Belt and Coastal Laggards Manufacturing-heavy states in the Midwest and Appalachia largely underperformed. Michigan (+30%) and West Virginia (+34%) never fully recovered the industrial output lost after the early-2000s recession and the Great Financial Crisis. Connecticut (+35%) and New Jersey (+47%) illustrate how high costs and slow demographic growth weighed on East Coast economies. Louisiana, hit by multiple hurricanes and refinery shutdowns, posted the slowest gain at just 23%, one-quarter of the national pace. If you enjoyed today’s post, check out https://www.voronoiapp.com/economy/-California-is-Now-the-4th-Largest-Economy-in-the-WorldBut-Where-Do-Other-US-States-Rank-5016  on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist. Fri, 11/07/2025 - 20:30 https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/north-dakota-texas-saw-greatest-gdp-growth-us-states-over-past-35-years-louisiana
Benny Johnson's SNAP Fix: Require Every Recipient To Reapply And Prove U.S. Citizenship Benny Johnson's SNAP Fix: Require Every Recipient To Reapply And Prove U.S. Citizenship Federal judges https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/run-food-banks-underway-snap-benefits-may-go-dark-weekend amid the ongoing government shutdown, which is now in its 32nd day. SNAP benefits ended on Saturday, but the court has given the administration until Monday to appeal.  The shutdown, which began on October 1, continues as the Senate is scheduled to vote on reopening the government on Monday. Polymarket odds of a reopening on Monday are below 1%. Reopening odds by the end of the week remain at 16%.  In the meantime, Google Search trends show "food bank near me" surged above Covid panic highs as those who rely heavily on the federal government to https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/what-are-chances-food-stamp-collapse-novemberimage Last week, major airlines and unions https://www.zerohedge.com/political/govt-shutdown-chaos-air-traffic-controller-shortages-snarl-airports-paychecks-go-blank for the government shutdown. Airline bosses demanded that leftist politicians back the Republican-led clean continued resolution bill.  A video posted on X shows Benny Johnson telling Newsmax's Rob Finnerty that if tens of millions of Americans were willing to stand in line for an experimental Covid vaccine, they can just as well stand in line for to reapply for food stamps. "My thought is shut it all down. Force everyone to reapply with American citizenship. Crack down on what is available on these programs - take the junk food off - and you'll see the number of people applying for these programs collapse. Force them to cook their own food," Johnson told Finnerty.  Finnerty responded, "They forced people like sheep to get in line to take vaccines - and within two months - something like 67% of the country was vaccinated - hundreds of millions of people in a short amount of time. You have to do the same thing here," adding, "You're talking about 42 million people and you can federalize it - don't leave it up to the states."  My solutions to the EBT/SNAP abuse scandal are simple and clear: - Shut it down - Require everyone to reapply for benefits - Restrict what can be purchased: ground beef, milk, eggs, fruits, vegetables. Basics only The result? Applications would plummet, and people would have no… https://t.co/i64dfy39p2 — Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1984298767315505175?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Related: https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/trump-admin-shuts-down-massive-66-million-food-stamp-fraud-scheme?ref=biztoc.com https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-says-snap-benefits-will-be-solved-next-month A vetting process for SNAP can crack down on claims of widespread fraud and root out illegal aliens who are a net drain on the nation. Sun, 11/02/2025 - 12:15 https://www.zerohedge.com/political/benny-johnsons-snap-fix-require-every-recipient-reapply-and-prove-us-citizenship
Almost Half Of Humanity Is Gen Z Or Gen Alpha Almost Half Of Humanity Is Gen Z Or Gen Alpha As of December 2024, the global population has reached 8.2 billion. For the first time in history, nearly half of humanity belongs to Generation Z and Generation Alpha—the digital-native generations. This visualization, https://www.visualcapitalist.com/ranked-the-worlds-population-by-generation ranks the world’s population by generation, showing how age cohorts are distributed across the planet. image The data for this graphic comes from https://wearesocial.com/us/blog/2025/10/digital-2026/ . Generation Beta (born 2025–2039), representing less than 1% of the population, is not shown in the graphic because of limited data. Gen Alpha Becomes the Largest Generation Generation Alpha, born between 2013 and 2025, now includes roughly 2.0 billion people, or 24.4% of the world’s population. Many of them are still in primary school, but they already outnumber every other generation. Their demographic weight will increasingly shape consumer markets, education systems, and technology trends in the coming decades. The countries driving this growth are concentrated in Africa and South Asia, where https://www.visualcapitalist.com/charted-declining-birth-rates-in-the-most-populous-countries-1950-today/  remain high. image Gen Z and Millennials Dominate the Workforce Gen Z (ages 13–28) and Millennials (ages 29–44) together account for 44% of all people—and most of the world’s workers. Millennials alone make up 1.7 billion people. The Aging Populations of Boomers and the Silent Generation At the upper end of the age spectrum, Baby Boomers (ages 61–79) represent about 12.8% of the population, while those 80 or older—the Silent Generation and older cohorts—make up just 2%. If you enjoyed today’s post, check out https://www.visualcapitalist.com/americas-wealth-distriution-by-generation/  on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist. Sat, 11/01/2025 - 19:25 https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/almost-half-humanity-gen-z-or-gen-alpha