I need to write a bitcoin book, I have way too much on my mind about it all.
I constantly hear about quantum computing and how it may crack Bitcoin. While I believe Bitcoin will adjust, I want to throw another take out there. When quantum computers reach the level it takes to crack Sha-256, I want people to grasp what sort of science breakthroughs, energy breakthroughs , and overall society breakthroughs come from a computer being able to live in a state of 1 and 0 at the same time for an extended period of time. It’s very possible you may not even need Bitcoin in that world. For me it’s very possible Bitcoin is the bridge to a world where we won’t need money.
@Pierre Rochard perfect!
As a bitcoiner, I feel weird every time I go to the bank now.
I completely admit I feel out of my depth with this subject, however my views very much align with this post by @calle
Lots of legit influencers running knots, people I respect, however their idealism reminds me of the cobra problem. Be careful. This makes me want to run core. It almost seems like the knots side wants to keep bitcoin censorship resistant money by censoring it. Personally I believe in satoshis game theory and the incentive structure plays out accordingly. For reference The “cobra problem” in India is a classic story about perverse incentives—a situation where a well-intended policy actually makes the problem worse. Here’s the background: • During British colonial rule in India, cobras were a major danger, especially in urban areas like Delhi. • To reduce the population, the government offered a bounty for every dead cobra. At first, this worked—people hunted cobras and turned them in for payment. But then an unintended consequence emerged: • People began breeding cobras just to kill them and collect the bounty. • When the government discovered this and ended the program, breeders released their now-worthless cobras into the wild. • The end result: the cobra population actually increased, making the situation worse than before. This is where the term “cobra effect” comes from—used in economics, public policy, and business to describe when an attempted solution to a problem ends up exacerbating it because of misaligned incentives. I would rather listen to @calle @npub1wqlz...rnrp and others, than people’s emotional idealism.
@calle is someone in this space that is really growing on me.
@nat brunell watching you navigate Dave Collum, impressive. Funny how guys like him, Brent Johnson, Keith Weiner, & Peter Schiff don’t understand the non-cooperative game theory of bitcoin. Not sure if you read Nash and the Bitcoin equilibrium yet.
Make it make sense image