This is the thing I canโt get passed and why I personally lean toward core. Everyone has this idea of what they think bitcoin should be, itโs literally designed in a way to combat this. In doing filtering (if it even works) you basically censor the chain and invite all sorts of legal issues. Monetary use is whatever the market says. Eventually the incentives wipe out the use of the spam. As fees rise why would any idiot waste their time putting this nonsense on the chain.
I think of lot of cores thoughts are getting lost in translation because people just label them as pro spam, itโs way deeper than that. I donโt think anyone in core nor
@npub1wqlz...rnrp is pro spam. Before all this half the bitcoin world believed Back was Satoshi.
It almost feels like itโs as simple as either bitcoin is censorship resistant money or it isnโt.

X (formerly Twitter)
Robert โฟreedlove (@Breedlove22) on X
โSpam is non-monetary transactions.โ
So the entire core vs knots debate hinges on the question: โWhat is money?โ
Whatever it is, money is...
All of that said, I still know so little about this myself and always willing to change my mind with more information and continue to listen to both sides with no anger or vitriol toward anyone. I