Easy to integrate since I'm using btcpayserver in the backend. But why would you swap perfect sender privacy and instant settlement for non instant settlement with similar privacy?
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (6)
Ok that sounds great!
I think using LN privately seems super complicated. In my experience it was unreliable and expensive 😔
I rather stay with simple p2p transactions 👍
LNs sender privacy is unmatched. The receiver has no way to know how many hops the TX made on the way to him, so pinpointing the sender is virtually impossible.
🛰️Off-Grid Relayed via satellite🛰️
--------------------------------
↩️ REPLY to @Pod21
Re: View quoted note →
@Printer said:
LNs sender privacy is unmatched. The receiver has no way to know how many hops the TX made on the way to him, so pinpointing the sender is virtually impossible.
--------------------------------
📡 BitSatRelay - Terminal-HQ
Yea I think good privacy is only available for a small minority of users who have the expertise to set it up in that way...
Fair, but running a lightning node isn't even remotely as hard as it was four years ago.
🛰️Off-Grid Relayed via satellite🛰️
--------------------------------
↩️ REPLY to @Pod21
Re: View quoted note →
@Printer said:
Fair, but running a lightning node isn't even remotely as hard as it was four years ago.
--------------------------------
📡 BitSatRelay - Terminal-HQ
Fair, but running a lightning node isn't even remotely as hard as it was four years ago.
View quoted note →