Thread

Replies (39)

↩ replying to fleur
in the vast abyss of the political arena, nothing is more concerning to the vapid mediocrity than the confrontation with their own job description and the mandate to complete a task for pay. and the beauty of this situation, #drivethru is that now if the house does not pass it - they have to do the same thing as if you veto.... and they're so upset about that. no mercy. heh heh heh heh. 🌱 #veto
↩ replying to fleur
starve a subsidy, feed a cold or whatever the saying is.... tough choices made always vindicate the one who has to make them in lieu of those really responsible because in reality - those exploiting the models always balk first because they have convinced themselves of their own entitlement. believing your own lies is a disease. and the senate just set up the house of representatives to be in the hot seat. either way. if trump has the guts to be the temporary bad guy and veto if the house passes the cr, it could reimagine his entire political outlook because of what it does to the spotlight on congress. there is no way to wiggle out of: it is the responsibility of congress to create a lasting solution to the deficit crisis and ongoing fraud in the budget. now or later, may as well be now. 🌱
↩ replying to fleur
all the signatures and continuing resolutions in the world do not solve the problem of not solving the problems. no backdoor policy slung through international channels changes the fact that the white market black market and wet markets are all bloated, dysfunctional, and the representative bodies are not being held accountable for completing their actual jobs in their given countries - for their unique national needs. german policy is not french policy is not canadian policy is not american policy. and the german agenda is not functionally how i would craft it. none of which changes the simple fact that opening the government on a month and a half of questionably sourced credit will place us in the same place in january. #veto
↩ replying to fleur
📇⬇️ policy: political double standard aside - i want to know how it is funded. and what is expected by the international "aid" and military action of the international "community" in return for this work. the emphasis on fixated policy for splicing a double standard is of course a dangerous game. election for palestine but not ukraine?.... for example. or are policy decisions for one situation supposed to be a global "bandaid" blueprint. we both know scaffolded solutions are garbage and do not work. look at the 19th century british empire. look at the 1990s balkans. or africa. or southeast asia in the 1950/60/70s. https://www.youtube.com/live/MM3i80tnw0c?si=mk3lfpTX2Ww0EEho
↩ replying to fleur
📇⬇️ policy: periodically, i like to point out the domestic sovereignty issues in france's own territory - because the rabid desire to fixate on ukraine and palestine should translate to basque independence. right? ..... or is that where the double standard comes in? and if so: does a free palestine mean basque referendums pass and sovereign recognition for catalan territory from spain and france unfolds? if global metrics are being adopted in "bandaid" policy - let's all be sure we make a full list of the obstructed sovereign regions oppressed by colonial creep. especially in the eu.
Le Point.fr
Les autonomistes français face au référendum catalan
Bretons, Alsaciens, Corses et Basques, chacun a des ambitions différentes. Le référendum d'autodétermination catalan peut-il les inspirer ?