Thread

🛡️
Sure, if you trust the physicists and the assumptions without proof of verification. But the physics of bitcoin disprove their models…specifically the modern definition of Superpostion, which breaks the theory of all CQC models. Bitcoin (and its physics) stand in direct defiance of this belief. The goal has always been to convince you otherwise. Your castle of cryptography is not safe anon!

Replies (1)

Lol, please. This is mathematically proven, you just have to trust math, not people. Which, for bitcoin people, trusting math is supposed to be everything. We can literarily estimate how many stable logic qbits we need for short-range and long-range attacks, the equations are all there. And the fact that processors can reliably harness quantum mechanics in the way needed for this is also experimentally proven, has been over and over again. You can see this as scare tactics by the illuminati if you want. But it'd be hilarious if bitcoin went down because bitcoiners one day decided they didn't need to trust math and physics anymore.