Thread

Revolut now requires you to provide the name of the recipient when sending bitcoin to an unhosted wallet. They sent an email yesterday to announce the new rules, and at the same time blocked all withdrawals from the app. You had to upgrade to the latest version (deployed today) before being allowed to withdraw your sats. I've just cancelled my daily and weekly recurring orders, and withdrawn the remaining 190,000 sats to Mr. Pika Chu's wallet. The order has been pending for half an hour, maybe a human agent needs to review and approve? How do they validate the authenticity of the information? What if I had entered your name?

Replies (5)

Since my previous Bitcoin withdrawal transaction of 190k sats to Mr. Pika Chu was finally approved by Revolut, I thought I'd follow-up with them to express my concerns about their ability to validate the now required recipient information when withdrawing to an "unhosted wallet." They sent me this official link that describes the legislation they follow: If you read the relevant chapters 3 and 4, it's clear that service providers (Revolut) are not even expected to validate the information, how could they?? You might think that the FCA, who also has access to this information, will be able to rely on blockchain surveillance (BS) software to confirm the accuracy the data, but BS software are based on shaky heuristics that have led to the serious problem of innocent people being harassed by the State, as reported here: https://mises.org/node/63712 If you find yourself in a such situation, you'll be considered guilty until you can prove your innocence. Good luck with that! As far as I'm concerned, I've stopped all my Bitcoin activity on Revolut. View quoted note β†’