Gloria Zhao is anti-Bitcoin maximalism and pro-NTF spam. She is a spam shitcoiner.
Core devs are compromised. Adam Back is compromised. All of them are spammer cucks to the bad actors like Jameson Slopp, Shinobi, shitcoinmagazine, Casey Rodarmor, Citrea and Chainway shitcoiners lab and and so on. Shitcoiners really likes Core v30 π©π©π©
Thread
Login to reply
Replies (73)
This shows what kind of spammer she is.. How did she even become the lead maintainer?!
This is how Gloria Zhao became Core lead maintainer.
And this is what Compromised Core devs did.
View quoted note β
CCP hates BTC, so why wouldnβt they create and build a Core Dev to infiltrate and destroy it.
Dictators hate Bitcoin, shitcoiners hate Bitcoin, central banks hate Bitcoin ...
What about this Core dev?
Fink, the final boss joo.
Netenyahoo, Adam Back, Israel hate Bitcoin.
If you actually follow the money.
After the Bitcoin foundation went bankrupt, it was Jeffery Epstein and a bunch of his associates that bankrolled core to take its place.
But you do make a good point, I wouldn't put it past them to do it.
The joos and commies are one and the same. Just look a bit different.
If that ditzy whore can fuck her way into destroying Bitcoin, then Bitcoin was worthless to begin with.
Core is worhtless.
There is huge difference.
Bitcoin is THE Global Most Secure Decentralized Unconfiscatable Peer-to-Peer Scarce Hard Sovereign Freedom Money, The Greatest Store of Value and The Strongest Hope for Humanity.
Well if that's true, then let's start trying some knots.
Jesus Christ on a cracker just fork already. The futures market thinks your ideas are retarded so I doubt you will actually put any skin in the game, but this constant bitching is pathetic.
GFY shitcoiner.
The fork will only come after enough nodes are running core 30 to allow childporn or malware on chain.
It's very unpopular and half of the nodes running core 30 are on corporate servers (they dropped out during that CloudFlare outage)
So just waiting on the shitcoiners to spin up more nodes and force the blockchain to fork.
You have no idea how any of this works.
Everything that you fear core30 βenablesβ was already possible from day 1 of this protocol.
You have no idea who is running core 30 or knots for that matter. Bitcoin is not a democracy. Your node matters to you and your transactions and matters very little to anyone else. A node that belongs to an entity with high economic activity matters more than your node.
Bitcoin is anarchy. It doesnβt recognize illegal content outside of what is or isnβt a valid transaction.
You must be a retarded shitcoiner.
Filters work but it will be even better with a soft fork that limits spam and useless arbitrary data on consensus level.
I am sure you support it.


Bitcoin is a democracy.
Every node is a vote.
You're a retarded shitcoiner who thinks that a top down system where an oligarchy forces node runners to host childporn is anarchy.
You're the stupidest person that I've come across trying to defend this shit.
You're literally siding with pedophiles against Bitcoin because you think that allowing childporn is what makes it anarchy.
Fucking moron.
Like holy fucking shit you are stupid.
Stupid fucking retard doesn't even know how to look shit up.
Half those core 30 nodes are on corporate servers (see the recent CloudFlare outage)
And even still it's not anywhere near half the network


You still have no idea who is running those nodes. A corporation like Coinbase who using cloud flare running core thirty is doing more for the Bitcoin network than all of the knots nodes combined.
Every node is not a vote. Your node is your business but has nothing to do with my node. There are no teams there are no leaders. There is simply consensus. A core thirty node running default policies validated transactions just like a node running 29 or 28. They are not voting on anything.
Calling people shitcoiners who understand bitcoin better than you is a bold move. Letβs see how that works out for you.
The larper and troll is spewing misinformation. Idiot.
Bitcoin node is a Bitcoin node. If all Coinbase nodes die now, Bitcoin won't even notice. Tick tock, next block.
I never said otherwise. I simply stated a node with high economic throughput was more meaningful to the network than your individual node. If you fork off and Coinbase doesnβt the network is less likely to notice your node vs a node with high economic throughput. This is obvious shit. Your node really only matters to you and your transactions because you are not important at all.
You did.
"Coinbase who using cloud flare running core thirty is doing more for the Bitcoin network than all of the knots nodes combined."
You imply that Conibase nodes are special and you directly say they are "doing more for the Bitcoin network" than Knots nodes. That is absolute bullshit and misinformation.
Iβm not implying anything. A node that is being used to validate 1000s of transactions a day is doing more work than one that is doing 1 transaction a year.
Is this not obvious to you?
See? You are a fucking retard.
My node and every other node on the network verifies all transactions. Is that not obvious to you?
Yes nodes validate the chain, and even relay transactions unless you are a retarded filter enthusiast, but the economic activity of your node is meaningless to everyone else. The economic activity on a node that is very active is meaningful to a lot of people. If you run your node with different consensus rules it really doesnβt matter.
Kind of a damage control? Retard. You are wrong again though.
No one cares what default relay policy your node runs. No one cares about your node. You thinking otherwise is the retarded take. Bitcoin is not a democracy.
Retard, where did I say that some is caring about my node?
Thatβs the context of this conversation you inserted yourself into you choad. The prior retard occupying your seat was trying to say that nodes represent a democratic process of some sort and that a core 30 node going down with the cloudflare outage was evidence of something. None of it made any sense.
Your writings not only make 0 sense, they are wrong.
You said that "A corporation like Coinbase who using cloud flare running core thirty is doing more for the Bitcoin network than all of the knots nodes combined." which is complete bullshit.
You said that "A node that is being used to validate 1000s of transactions a day is doing more work than one that is doing 1 transaction a year. " which is complete bullshit.
And you said "No one cares what default relay policy your node runs. No one cares about your node." which I never said otherwise and is again a complete made up bulshit by yourself.
Every node is a vote. That is true.
"So, who secures Bitcoin?!
If securing Bitcoin requires consensus on what Bitcoin is, and Bitcoin is a database of values assigned to keys, and Bitcoin has a protocol for reassignment of keys, then securing Bitcoin can only be done by β¦ your node!
Nodes! Nodes! Nodes!
In the end, YOU secure Bitcoin, but the only time that matters is when you agree with someone else on what Bitcoin is, and the only way that you can express yourself to others is via your node."
Read this, retard.
https://medium.com/bitcoinerrorlog/who-secures-bitcoin-95b19bbcda3c
A corporate node is helping a lot of people transact. Your node is doing almost nothing for anyone else. Therefore the corporate node is doing more work. This isnβt hard tard.
Retard, all full Bitcoin nodes verify all transaction. There are no special nodes.
Yes but a full node I manage helps me transact preserve my own privacy and sovereignty. It does nothing for you. A corporate node makes it possible for the majority of the public to transact who donβt run nodes.
You need to study Bitcoin harder and listen less to shitcoiners or people who manipulate you, like Jameson Slopp for example.
Coinbase the company matters to their customers. Their node is the same as everyone elseses node and is part of the whole network. There are no special nodes.
How do transactions make it to the network? Work back from that and tell me that a node that pushes more transaction to the network is doing the same work as your node that simply verify the chain like all the other nodes and once a year sends a few sats to cold storage. No one would care if your node went down. Thousands would care if coinbases did. Therefore your node is less important.
You have a fucked up point of view.
What happened with FTX node? Anyone cares about it?
What happened with MtGox node? Anyone cares about it?
Should I go on?
If Coinbase stops their customers will be affected. If it dies, there are more than enough alternatives and version 2 by a different entity would be born as well.
Tick tock, next block. Long Live Bitcoin Plebs and Bitcoin!
People care the moment they need to transact and canβt. Otherwise they donβt care. Still donβt change the fact that the Coinbase node is doing more work than yours and has more economic value. Iβm sorry that bothers you.
As a rule nodes are not that important individually. Again Bitcoin is not a democracy so your choice of node software doesnβt matter except to you.
You contradic yourself. Are nodes not important individually or they are important for the individuals?
Your thingking is completely messed up. I see that you like to suck corporate dick. If you like it do it. But its not how Bitcoin network works. Bitcoin is decentralized. And all nodes matter.
Yes but a full node I manage helps me transact preserve my own privacy and sovereignty. It does nothing for you. A corporate node makes it possible for the majority of the public to transact who donβt run nodes.
View quoted note →
Also don't forget that all Coinbase customers can run their own node and that way they won't need Coinbase at all.
So you stating that nodes does not matter individually is a complete and utter bullshit.
Your node doesnβt matter to me at all. Coinbases node doesnβt matter to me at all either.
The network matters but you donβt.
I am part of the network with my node : )) Nodes like mide are the network.
Iβm very proud of you. Your nodes donβt matter to me
The nodes matter to the individuals. They donβt provide those individual any control over the network or matter to any other individual. The only people concerned about other peoples nodes are the fucking weirdos over at knots.
You are completely brainwashed. Study Bitcoin more.
I already told you I was proud of you. You are doing a great job.
Is she able to make any coherent sentence?
: )), like, kind of, like, you know ...
Here some of the shitcoiners who like and run Core v30 ... π©π©π©
The core dev team has clearly been coopted.
When things donβt add up over and over itβs because youβre being gaslit.
βstrawman arguments repeated ad nauseam
βad hominem attacks instead of thoughtful debate.
Spend a few minutes listening to mechanic debating op_return and youβll clearly see whoβs speaking truthfully.
ππ»π§‘π»
Absolutely!
pay attention to the people who ignore this like its nothing, tells you more than what this simpleton actually tries to say....
The core dev team has clearly been coopted.
When things donβt add up over and over itβs because youβre being gaslit.
βsilly strawman arguments repeated ad nauseam
βad hominem attacks instead of thoughtful debate.
Spend a few minutes listening to Mechanic @Bitcoin Mechanic debating op_return and youβll clearly see whoβs speaking truthfully.
ππ»π§‘π»
View quoted note β
Sheβs getting so much hate but many Bitcoiners ARE in fact narrow-minded and shut down anything else simply because itβs not Bitcoin despite other coins having real utility.
But again, it doesnβt surprise me that purist ideologue retards behave in such a manner. Itβs the same bullshit as politics all over againβ¦ any opinion that is against a pre-determined belief system is viewed as heresy and that person is unintelligent and a traitor.
View quoted note β
Interesting. That list of people have not liked me for a long time.
Core is blatantly spitting in our faces begging for a chain split. It will be important not to make any sudden changes until we know their strategy. Because of this I think the BIP-444 "Temporary Softfork" idea is brilliant. Gives us time to build Knots and Ocean adoption while watching for Core's next moves.
Yes run Knots


Crazy stuff
Yea, I disagree with her, Iβm narrow minded and she is dumb.
She is "open-minded" spam supporter and shitcoiner or I would say mindless shitcoiner.
Yea. She is / was lead dev for Bitcoin. What a fuckin disaster.
Get a grip dude π if that clip makes you lose your mind you might want to focus on your mind.
Get a grip and look at all the evidence. This is just one of many. You are asleep.
I just looked at this evidence you submitted to us here in the court of Nostr sir π
Your hyperbole doesnβt match what she actually said. Plus thereβs at least one edit so thereβs that, but still. This is not a crazy evil person talking crazy shit here sorry ya gotta do better to convince me at leastβ¦.
: )
Notice something wrong?
Compromised Core devs rejected the fix for inscriptions pretending it has been "controversial PR".
Compromised Core dev pushed OP_RETURN as if it was not controversial.
View quoted note β
View quoted note →
View quoted note βThis is how Gloria Zhao became Core lead maintainer.
View quoted note β
And this is what Compromised Core devs did.
View quoted note β
View quoted note →
If only there was a private decentralized cryptocurrency that incentivized the miners to protect the monetary transactions, and their transmission of value instead of adding unnecessary data into the blockchain π€.
If only, if only...
Nothing stops greed. Spam money would be on top of what they get.
We are attacked from inside. You are not immune to such attacks either.
But we still have means to protect Bitcoin.
More, or less but so far.
Bitcoin's core team have not acted in the best interests of the project.
Monero's potentially compromised contributors have stepped down, and updates require a community consensus.
Not saying it's perfect but Monero seems to have less compromised devs, and has more mechanisms to ensure compromised devs don't have total control.
Monero already had The Op_Return (TX_Extra) debate, and TX_Extra was reduced to counteract ordinals on Monero
So far between the two it seems like Monero has the better record for now.
But I'd like to hear the suggestions to counteract these problems in Bitcoin, so hopefully it can also be saved.
ππ