Thread

Gloria Zhao is anti-Bitcoin maximalism and pro-NTF spam. She is a spam shitcoiner. Core devs are compromised. Adam Back is compromised. All of them are spammer cucks to the bad actors like Jameson Slopp, Shinobi, shitcoinmagazine, Casey Rodarmor, Citrea and Chainway shitcoiners lab and and so on. Shitcoiners really likes Core v30 πŸ’©πŸ’©πŸ’©

Replies (73)

You have no idea how any of this works. Everything that you fear core30 β€œenables” was already possible from day 1 of this protocol. You have no idea who is running core 30 or knots for that matter. Bitcoin is not a democracy. Your node matters to you and your transactions and matters very little to anyone else. A node that belongs to an entity with high economic activity matters more than your node. Bitcoin is anarchy. It doesn’t recognize illegal content outside of what is or isn’t a valid transaction.
Bitcoin is a democracy. Every node is a vote. You're a retarded shitcoiner who thinks that a top down system where an oligarchy forces node runners to host childporn is anarchy. You're the stupidest person that I've come across trying to defend this shit. You're literally siding with pedophiles against Bitcoin because you think that allowing childporn is what makes it anarchy. Fucking moron. Like holy fucking shit you are stupid.
Every node is not a vote. Your node is your business but has nothing to do with my node. There are no teams there are no leaders. There is simply consensus. A core thirty node running default policies validated transactions just like a node running 29 or 28. They are not voting on anything. Calling people shitcoiners who understand bitcoin better than you is a bold move. Let’s see how that works out for you.
I never said otherwise. I simply stated a node with high economic throughput was more meaningful to the network than your individual node. If you fork off and Coinbase doesn’t the network is less likely to notice your node vs a node with high economic throughput. This is obvious shit. Your node really only matters to you and your transactions because you are not important at all.
Your writings not only make 0 sense, they are wrong. You said that "A corporation like Coinbase who using cloud flare running core thirty is doing more for the Bitcoin network than all of the knots nodes combined." which is complete bullshit. You said that "A node that is being used to validate 1000s of transactions a day is doing more work than one that is doing 1 transaction a year. " which is complete bullshit. And you said "No one cares what default relay policy your node runs. No one cares about your node." which I never said otherwise and is again a complete made up bulshit by yourself. Every node is a vote. That is true. "So, who secures Bitcoin?! If securing Bitcoin requires consensus on what Bitcoin is, and Bitcoin is a database of values assigned to keys, and Bitcoin has a protocol for reassignment of keys, then securing Bitcoin can only be done by … your node! Nodes! Nodes! Nodes! In the end, YOU secure Bitcoin, but the only time that matters is when you agree with someone else on what Bitcoin is, and the only way that you can express yourself to others is via your node." Read this, retard. https://medium.com/bitcoinerrorlog/who-secures-bitcoin-95b19bbcda3c
How do transactions make it to the network? Work back from that and tell me that a node that pushes more transaction to the network is doing the same work as your node that simply verify the chain like all the other nodes and once a year sends a few sats to cold storage. No one would care if your node went down. Thousands would care if coinbases did. Therefore your node is less important.
You have a fucked up point of view. What happened with FTX node? Anyone cares about it? What happened with MtGox node? Anyone cares about it? Should I go on? If Coinbase stops their customers will be affected. If it dies, there are more than enough alternatives and version 2 by a different entity would be born as well. Tick tock, next block. Long Live Bitcoin Plebs and Bitcoin!
People care the moment they need to transact and can’t. Otherwise they don’t care. Still don’t change the fact that the Coinbase node is doing more work than yours and has more economic value. I’m sorry that bothers you. As a rule nodes are not that important individually. Again Bitcoin is not a democracy so your choice of node software doesn’t matter except to you.
You contradic yourself. Are nodes not important individually or they are important for the individuals? Your thingking is completely messed up. I see that you like to suck corporate dick. If you like it do it. But its not how Bitcoin network works. Bitcoin is decentralized. And all nodes matter.
ihsotas's avatar ihsotas
Yes but a full node I manage helps me transact preserve my own privacy and sovereignty. It does nothing for you. A corporate node makes it possible for the majority of the public to transact who don’t run nodes.
View quoted note →
The core dev team has clearly been coopted. When things don’t add up over and over it’s because you’re being gaslit. β€”strawman arguments repeated ad nauseam β€”ad hominem attacks instead of thoughtful debate. Spend a few minutes listening to mechanic debating op_return and you’ll clearly see who’s speaking truthfully. πŸ‘ŠπŸ»πŸ§‘πŸ»
The core dev team has clearly been coopted. When things don’t add up over and over it’s because you’re being gaslit. β€”silly strawman arguments repeated ad nauseam β€”ad hominem attacks instead of thoughtful debate. Spend a few minutes listening to Mechanic @Bitcoin Mechanic debating op_return and you’ll clearly see who’s speaking truthfully. πŸ‘ŠπŸ»πŸ§‘πŸ» View quoted note β†’
She’s getting so much hate but many Bitcoiners ARE in fact narrow-minded and shut down anything else simply because it’s not Bitcoin despite other coins having real utility. But again, it doesn’t surprise me that purist ideologue retards behave in such a manner. It’s the same bullshit as politics all over again… any opinion that is against a pre-determined belief system is viewed as heresy and that person is unintelligent and a traitor. View quoted note β†’
Core is blatantly spitting in our faces begging for a chain split. It will be important not to make any sudden changes until we know their strategy. Because of this I think the BIP-444 "Temporary Softfork" idea is brilliant. Gives us time to build Knots and Ocean adoption while watching for Core's next moves.
More, or less but so far. Bitcoin's core team have not acted in the best interests of the project. Monero's potentially compromised contributors have stepped down, and updates require a community consensus. Not saying it's perfect but Monero seems to have less compromised devs, and has more mechanisms to ensure compromised devs don't have total control. Monero already had The Op_Return (TX_Extra) debate, and TX_Extra was reduced to counteract ordinals on Monero So far between the two it seems like Monero has the better record for now. But I'd like to hear the suggestions to counteract these problems in Bitcoin, so hopefully it can also be saved.