Thread

Two options. Pick one. 1. Money printer comes online. Global liquidity expands. Your bags pump hard. Everyone else suffers. 2. Governments become fiscally responsible. Bags never pump. The world starts healing. #asknostr

Replies (20)

Sorry, I think my previous reply was unclear. I'm 100% on board that in scenario one the debased currency would be replaced by bitcoin. But in regards to scenario two, I'm not so sure what that would look like. I suppose it would depend on how far the fiscal responsibility went. If it included the whole shebang: no more seizures, no more censoring, no more inflation, etc, then I could imagine bitcoin not playing such an important role, and, in turn, losing its value. However, I could also imagine a scenario where trust in central authorities is irreversibly broken, regardless of course correction, and people keep on stacking anyway (I'd likely fall in this camp).
That's not how number 2 would go. Number 2 is what governments SHOULD do, but it's also the fastest way to have the bulk of citizens actually riot against them, because so many people rely on government subsidy to get by, which in turn needs money printer to go brrrrrr. There would be absolute chaos and destruction before austerity ever resulted in healing, and that's only if they managed to hold the line through the ordeal.
Easily option 2. I don’t need bags to pump. I’m productive, I just need honest money where savings do not lose purchasing power. Bitcoin accomplishes that in both scenarios and fiat does less damage to the world in option 2.