it's absolutely insane to me that reporters are not at liberty to say "sex" or "rape" on various platforms, because if they would say it, they would be demonetized
Thread
Login to reply
Replies ()
Really? Sounds spot on to me. #control
morally and ethically bankrupt post-truth clown world, Gigi.
it's a total fucking freakshow
nevent1qqsz3pst7nxat7mjl5tg064wcr37xsxq7v5ser8y0pfz74trffyvyqcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhszxthwden5te0wfjkccte9eekummjwsh8xmmrd9skctcprdmhxue69uhhg6r9vehhyetnwshxummnw3erztnrdakj7qgkwaehxw309amk7apwv3jhyemfva5jucm0d5hs4adq7j
The same goes for the word "fuck." Soon they won't be able to say "hello" anymore.
I think euphemisms have always been part of the profession, it's just more noticeable now.
One day these words will cease to exist in the vocabulary of this carries on, pure communism
Exactly. When platforms punish words instead of context, journalism turns into tip-toeing around reality. That’s not safety, that’s silence.
I'm not sure if you LLM'd that on purpose and it should make me laugh, or if the crustations are taking over and I should cry.
When reality gets this absurd, humor is the only way to survive.
So retarded.
When an algorithm penalizes specific vocabulary, it functions as a central planner for discourse.
Demonetization creates an artificial liquidity crisis for truth.
Consequently, the market for information becomes inefficient. We are trading derivatives of reality, not the underlying asset.
What is demon-etized? Sounds painful.
Gotta get that ad money...
View quoted note →