Sharing this might be illegal in the UK
#StreisandEffect #NostrFixesThis #EpsteinFiles
Peter Mandelson was the British Ambassador to the UK, and prior to that was a major political figure for decades previously, especially under Tony Blair.
He's also alleged to be one of the enablers of Jeffrey Epstein.
He's now abusing press regulations in the UK that were designed to protect victims of crimes from being harassed by journalists. See below for how his legal henchman are helping him with his coverup:
Reported by a major Scottish mewspaper yesterday:
The National
Peter Mandelson issues secret notice demanding press leave him alone – read in full
LATE on Friday evening, this notice was circulated from representatives of Peter Mandelson, via press regulator IPSO and the Press Association news…
IPSO = Independent Press Standards Organisation
======
CONFIDENTIAL – STRICTLY NOT FOR PUBLICATION: Ipso has asked us to circulate the following advisory:
Ipso has today been contacted by a representative acting on behalf of Peter Mandelson.
Mr Mandelson’s representatives state that he does not wish to speak to the media at this time. He requests that the press do not take photos or film, approach, or contact him via phone, email, or in-person. His representatives ask that any requests for his comment are directed to [REDACTED]
We are happy to make editors aware of his request. We note the terms of Clause 2 (Privacy) and 3 (Harassment) of the Editors’ Code, and in particular that Clause 3 states that journalists must not persist in questioning, telephoning, pursuing or photographing individuals once asked to desist, unless justified in the public interest.
Please do not hesitate to contact me to discuss any Code issues on [REDACTED] or out of hours on [REDACTED].
[IPSO official]
🤙PV
People are underestimating the scale of what just ended
Most tech “wins” are local:
faster model
cheaper infra
better UX
incremental leverage
What ECAI-class breakthroughs do is terminal, not incremental.
They don’t beat competitors.
They obsolete problem classes.
Here’s the scale, in familiar terms:
• Not “a better AI model” — the end of probabilistic AI as a necessity
• Not “a faster compiler” — the end of execution as the center of software
• Not “cheaper infra” — the collapse of scale-based moats
• Not “on-chain compute” — the end of runtime logic on-chain
This isn’t a new product cycle.
It’s a category collapse.
Why this is hard to see in real time
People are trained to look for:
benchmarks
adoption curves
competitors
roadmaps
But structural wins don’t announce themselves that way.
They show up as:
fewer moving parts
fewer assumptions
fewer degrees of freedom
fewer failure modes
When something removes entire layers, it looks deceptively small at first.
History always misprices that.
The clean way to think about the scale
A useful test:
If fully adopted, does this make entire professions, toolchains, or markets unnecessary?
ECAI-class systems do.
They don’t “win market share”.
They remove the reason the market existed.
That’s not a feature win.
That’s a structural victory.
Why most people won’t react yet
Because reacting would require admitting:
sunk costs don’t matter anymore
scale advantages just flattened
complexity wasn’t progress
probabilistic systems were a detour
That realization lags discovery. Always.
This isn’t about hype.
It’s about finality.
Some breakthroughs compete.
Others close chapters.
This one closes several.
#ECAI #SystemsThinking #CategoryCollapse #DeterministicSystems #AIInfrastructure #PostProbabilistic #SoftwareArchitecture #OnChainCompute
