Thread

Gloria Zhao is anti-Bitcoin maximalism and pro-NTF spam. She is a spam shitcoiner. Core devs are compromised. Adam Back is compromised. All of them are spammer cucks to the bad actors like Jameson Slopp, Shinobi, shitcoinmagazine, Casey Rodarmor, Citrea and Chainway shitcoiners lab and and so on. Shitcoiners really likes Core v30 πŸ’©πŸ’©πŸ’©

Replies (33)

↩ replying to n0>1
Its crystal clear that Core devs are compromised and Citrea are shitcoiners bad actors. Another Core shitcoiner who proposed the OP_RETURN change from 80 Bytes to 100 000 Bytes becuase of the Jamson Slopp's Citrea bad acotrs. 🀑🀑🀑 "With Citrea, Chainway is working to help Bitcoin better accommodate decentralized finance (DeFi), NFTs and other use cases that were previously only possible on smart contract-based blockchains like Ethereum, but are now possible for Bitcoin to handle." "We're hearing things like Citrea is better than Ethereum," Chainway Labs co-founder Orkun Mahir Kılıç told CoinDesk. "It'll be better with time, because there's like $1 trillion, as of now, sitting in the Bitcoin blockchain. It is the most secure, battle-tested and decentralized blockchain. And we are bringing decentralized finance to it." 🀑🀑🀑
coinglass
Bitcoin Zero-Knowledge Rollup Citrea Raises $2.7M in Seed Funding | CoinGlass
 Citrea are fucked up shitcoin project and bad actors just like Jameson Slopp.
image image image image image image
The core dev team has clearly been coopted. When things don’t add up over and over it’s because you’re being gaslit. β€”strawman arguments repeated ad nauseam β€”ad hominem attacks instead of thoughtful debate. Spend a few minutes listening to mechanic debating op_return and you’ll clearly see who’s speaking truthfully. πŸ‘ŠπŸ»πŸ§‘πŸ»
The core dev team has clearly been coopted. When things don’t add up over and over it’s because you’re being gaslit. β€”silly strawman arguments repeated ad nauseam β€”ad hominem attacks instead of thoughtful debate. Spend a few minutes listening to Mechanic @Bitcoin Mechanic debating op_return and you’ll clearly see who’s speaking truthfully. πŸ‘ŠπŸ»πŸ§‘πŸ» View quoted note β†’
Core is blatantly spitting in our faces begging for a chain split. It will be important not to make any sudden changes until we know their strategy. Because of this I think the BIP-444 "Temporary Softfork" idea is brilliant. Gives us time to build Knots and Ocean adoption while watching for Core's next moves.
↩ replying to BitcoinIsFuture
More, or less but so far. Bitcoin's core team have not acted in the best interests of the project. Monero's potentially compromised contributors have stepped down, and updates require a community consensus. Not saying it's perfect but Monero seems to have less compromised devs, and has more mechanisms to ensure compromised devs don't have total control. Monero already had The Op_Return (TX_Extra) debate, and TX_Extra was reduced to counteract ordinals on Monero So far between the two it seems like Monero has the better record for now. But I'd like to hear the suggestions to counteract these problems in Bitcoin, so hopefully it can also be saved.