Thread

Check for yourself. Up is the Z axis in case you cant figure it out.

lol you're a liar as well as stupid. oh well.

Yiu believe you are upside down on a ball held on by a magical force you cant prove exists because you look at the sky in the southern hemisphere? Have a word with yourself. 😅😂 I thought Monero bros were supposed to be smart.

now you're just repeating shit because you got called out and can't bring receipts.

Math checks out... 🫡

and so wheres the data that shows thats due to upwards acceleration?

In freefall it is 0. Check for yourself. Dont trust, verify.

jfc dude. you need a basic high school physics class. okay I'll do some basic explanation. you don't feel like you're moving 500 mph in an airplane either right? likewise the accelerometer in your phone is measuring contact forces. it won't measure 500 mph either once the plane has completely accelerated. however there's 9.8 m/s ² of potential energy always pulling down on you. You're absolutely right about that. when that potential energy is converted to real (like in free fall or plane reaching cruising velocity) it shows zero. so your accelerometer shows that there's that amount of potential energy existing. it does NOT show that that's due to an upward acceleration, just that there's a force acting on it. very curious how you got to that conclusion. we would have to be *constantly* accelerating at 9.8 m/s squared in order for that downward force to be maintained (like how you feel acceleration when the plane takes off, but not when it's cruising). so in less than a year (after this acceleration began) we would be traveling AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT. so your model is this: we are hurtling through space on a flat plane at an UNCONCEIVABLE velocity that is constantly increasing but all that velocity is completely unpreceivable in any way. and for some reason that downward pressure is lower at higher elevations on the Earth. and you think this is a completely plausible explanation that doesn't require any magical thinking 👍

The accelerometer shows an UPWARD vector or you saying accelerometer only shows acceleration only when not resting on earth? 😅 The earth is moving at a constant velocity but requires constant accelerstion to keep the veloxity. Like you keep your foot on the gas in a car to keep it moving, or the speed would drop off. If there was gravity downward force, it would show downward acceleration in freefall and when resting on earth, but accelerometer doesnt show that.

you can imagine the accelerometer to be a small weight in a box that is suspended by springs in all directions. when the weight gets pulled and a spring is lengthened, it reads acceleration in that direction. at rest on the earth surface, the "upward" spring is lengthened and it shows an upward vector. when you release the accelerometer and allow it to fall, the weight returns to neutral, no springs are lengthened and it shows no vector. >> The earth is moving at a constant velocity but requires constant accelerstion to keep the veloxity. Like you keep your foot on the gas in a car to keep it moving, or the speed would drop off. this doesn't make any sense. a mass either has "a constant velocity" or "constant acceleration", you can't have both lol. The car is either accelerating or holding a constant speed. and in order for us to experience a constant 9.8 meters per second squared of downward force, we would have to be *constantly accelerating* in the opposite direction. NOT maintaining a constant velocity. so according to your hypothesis, the sun and moon and earth and everything that we see is somehow holding itself together while hurtling through space at thousands of times speed of light. and accelerating every second. but without us having any observable data to confirm this fantastic speed of course. and this is more believable to you than " mass effects a pulling effect on other mass " something that actually has demonstratable evidence behind it.

That is called special pleading logical fallacy. There is no imagining anything about an accelerometer. It reads acceleration or do you deny that? To have constant velocity, you need constant acceleration. It is constant because each second (time), the same measure is applied to keep the same speed. Changes in acceleration (called jerk rate) would be different amounts of force applied over time instead of same amount. When you start your car, your acceleration is higher until you get to the cruising speed and then to maintain the cruising speed requires the same acceleration/force applied.

I described to you how the device worked. predicably, you want to ignore its actual functioning also, you're making it very obvious that you dont have the basic knowledge required to have this conversation. acceleration is the *rate of change in the velocity* of a mass. "to have constant velocity you need constant acceleration" is a nonsense statement. The acceleration of a mass at a constant velocity is zero. and maintaining a constant velocity as in a car (ie, against friction) requires force, not acceleration. we're done here 🙏

Thanks for the discussion.