Thread

#德国之声中文 【在台陆配就任立法委员 李贞秀称“唯一效忠中华民国”】 在台陆配李贞秀周二(2月3日)于台湾立法院宣誓就任立法委员,但其国籍身份依旧为舆论关注焦点。 面对外界质疑,李贞秀周二接受媒体访问时强调,自己已在台湾居住超过30年、一直是拿台湾护照和台胞证,且育有5名子女皆为台湾人,因此热爱与守护台湾的心不亚于任何人。被问及若两岸发生冲突的相关问题,她表示,自己是依《中华民国宪法》宣誓就任的立法委员,将唯一、绝对效忠中华民国。 李贞秀此次递补,源于台湾民众党执行“两年条款”,党内立委黄珊珊、黄国昌等6人于周日(1日)辞去立委职务。中选会随后公告,由洪毓祥、蔡春绸、王安祥、邱慧洳、陈清龙及李贞秀6人递补当选不分区立法委员。 针对陆配身份的立委国籍问题,内政部2日表示,已将“退出中华人民共和国国籍申请表”送达李贞秀的国会办公室,并函请其提供已办理放弃外国国籍的相关证明文件。 台湾陆委会及内政部多次强调,《两岸人民关系条例》保障在台设籍满10年的陆配参选权利,但依《国籍法》规定,任公职者仍须在到职1年内完成放弃外国国籍。内政部说明,相关规范除维护国家利益外,也在于保障民选公职人员,避免因职务性质与双重国籍而面临向中国政府提供资讯的法律义务冲突。 在实务层面,中国不承认中华民国,陆配往往难以因台湾身分成功办理放弃中国国籍。李贞秀2日到立法院宣誓就职并完成报到后表示,她认同中华民国立法委员须单一国籍;她虽已特地前往中国湖南省申请放弃国籍,但在县级与市级公安机关的申请均未获受理。 ![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HANzGO4asAA4qoH?format=jpg&name=orig)

Replies (35)

To the text: Inheritance of contracts should be defined in the contract itself, and the person inheriting should have to explicitly agree to the terms, to take over the contract. If they have no valid tenancy contract and refuse to leave, they are trespassing.
🔔 Češi posílají na Ukrajinu naftová topidla: V pátek na Ukrajinu vyrazily generátory na výrobu tepla, financované z české sbírky Dárek pro Putina. Celkem se na ně vybralo přes 180 milionů korun a přispělo téměř 95 tisíc dárců. Do Kyjeva by měly dorazit v neděli, nejpozději v pondělí. #CzechNews #News #Press #Media
读史不深,对冯道并无印象,纯基于《太平年》刻画的形象。 欧阳修对冯道忠的评说。 我只能说,想靠诗词幸进的格局,连大道小道都不分,还是少喝点酒,多品些民间疾苦吧。 冯道在乱世,尽所能苦心维系了统治秩序。 对百姓来说,有序永远比无序,更有活下去的可能。 尊儒重名,已舍名务实,还想怎样?
🛡️
The Journey of a Thousand Miles (Taoist) A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. Taoism emphasizes starting where we are. Gratitude is a single step: we start by noticing one thing we're thankful for. We don't need to have everything figured out; we begin with this moment, this breath, this gift. Thankfulness is the first step on the path. "A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step." — Tao Te Ching, ch. 64
做美股的系好安全带,下周有概率要浪。 软件股确实部分个股已经出现明确止跌形态,但还有些股在跌。 所以整个板块暂时不能说企稳,顶多反弹。 而TGA数据趋势推演下,下周有概率因为流动性紧张,触发被动踩踏。 如果发生,那就是不止软件,而是大范围的泥沙俱下。 当然高开企稳最好,接着奏乐接着舞
🛡️
Just wondering aloud, for no particular reason, but do most of you feel like you almost exclusively get engagement from the same few dozen accounts, despite having hundreds of followers? I don't mind it, in fact it's probably preferable, but that has been my experience. I definitely reply/engage most with those same npubs, but I feel like I roam around into other peoples' threads a decent amount.
🛡️
Yes, and that’s how you can tell algorithm-driven social media isn’t natural. Think about high school or college. You’re exposed to lots of people, but you consistently interact with a smaller core group, while new individuals drift in and out over time. Decentralized social media mirrors real life far more closely.
🛡️
So stand for Alberta, wild and free, Where the land makes men and the mountains teach. From prairie wind to alpine stone, This is our work, this is our home. We bow to no crown, we kneel to no fear, We answer to truth and those we hold dear. With open skies and a steady hand, We stand for Alberta, unbroken land. #Alberta1st 🏔️
Nic's avatar Nic
From the frost on the rails at the break of dawn, To the rigs lit up while the night rolls on, We were raised on work, not words or pose, Hands in the dirt, boots in the snow. No silver spoon, no borrowed claim, Just earned respect and an honest name. We don’t wait for permission to shape our fate. We build it strong, we carry the weight. #Alberta1st View quoted note →
View quoted note →
Howdy folks, if any Haven users out there want to test the latest updates on master before I cut a release, this one is all about Web of Trust settings. Haven’s built-in WoT model has been moved behind an interface and can now be easily replaced by alternative algorithms. For example, I’m using my own ownertrust model. It can also be adapted to use external sources, such as calling one of the fancy WoT tools out there. Haven default WoT mofel can now 1. Be periodically refreshed at configurable predefined intervals (default 24h), thanks to @Sergey B. (idea by @Girino Vey!). 2. Allow you to choose your WoT "depth" for the Inbox and Chat relays 0 - Public relay, no write restrictions (not recommended) 1 - Only the relay owner can write to their relay (for the extra antisocial folk or when your relay is under attack and you just don’t want to deal with it) 2 - Pubkeys directly followed by the relay owner can write to Inbox and Chat 3 - Friends of friends with a configurable minimum number of common followers (Haven’s old default behaviour) I also took the time to fix several bugs and race conditions in the default WoT algorithm that caused Kind 3 events to be counted multiple times, inflating the WoT numbers. As a consequence, Depth 3 should now be stricter, especially for folks with small follow lists and high values for `WOT_MINIMUM_FOLLOWERS`. For further details, have a look at 📃.md As with all new code, there be dragons. Feel free to report bugs on Haven’s issue tracker. #haven #wot #relay
🔔 Jednání o míru zamrzlo na dvou klíčových otázkách. Mluvit se mělo i o rychlém uspořádání voleb na Ukrajině: Druhé kolo třístranných jednání Ukrajiny, USA a Ruska v Abú Zabí nepřineslo průlom. Prezident Volodymyr Zelenskyj potvrdil, že patová situace je způsobena hlavně dvěma stále nevyřešenými klíčovými otázkami. Jednání se dotkla také možného časového rámce mírové dohody, podle agentury Reuters se řešilo dokonce brzké konání voleb na Ukrajině, v těchto bodech však shoda zatím nepanuje. Prezident Zelenskyj ale v podobném duchu zmínil, že USA chce míru dosáhnout do června. #CzechNews #News #Press #Media
you know... I was thinking about it, we start off with these simple observations " why are the stars inverted in the southern hemisphere " and the only explanation that actually fit the observed data is people walking around on a sphere. but that doesn't make any fucking sense if you don't know anything about *the context of the sphere itself* so for thousands of years this conversation was the status quo. P1 : " this ball model is the only model that explains the data. " P2 : "lol, that's ridiculous what keeps people from falling off the ball?" from the 18th and 19th century advances in lenses etc made it clear that the flat earth hypothesis was doomed as the logical gymnastics had to increase as observational data was gathered. but it's only the early 20th century that we get general relativity and data to *actually show* there IS a "force" holding people on the ball. iow, we get the context for the sphere people are walking around on. flat earthers are fucking retarded, they don't even understand that there is basic observational data which contradicts their model of the world. data people have been trying to explain since we were sailing around in dug out canoes, but its kinda understandable retardation if you think about the time frame it took to actually get here. they don't understand GR and to them, physicists are just priests of a new religion. lacking understanding about how the data was collected or how to verify it themselves, what recourse do they have except to ooga booga about it?
Enki's avatar Enki
Man, that's enough brain cells lost for me. Flat earthers are just about as bad as foaming at the mouth Bitcoin maximalists. 😂
View quoted note →