#德国之声中文
新台币改版拿掉孙中山
国台办怒斥“数典忘祖、令人不齿”
陆委会反酸“这么尊崇孙中山，人民币为何不放上去”
在新闻会被记者问及台湾民进党当局推动新台币纸钞改版、新版将不再放入孙中山等政治人物肖像时，中国国台办发言人陈斌华周四表示：“今年是中国民主革命的伟大先驱孙中山先生诞辰160周年。民进党当局刻意推动新台币纸钞‘去孙中山化’，其目的就是要割裂两岸历史文化联结，推动‘去中国化’，在台湾社会形塑‘台独’意识形态。这种包藏祸心的政治操弄，是对中山先生和辛亥革命先驱的背叛，数典忘祖、令人不齿。”
陈斌华还称，“不管民进党当局如何处心积虑、胡作非为，两岸同属一个中国的历史和法理事实改变不了，台湾同胞的中华民族认同抹灭不掉”。
陆委会：“台湾从未有去中国化的问题，台湾保存的文化底蕴，比中国深厚得多”
台湾陆委会副主委梁文杰则于周四下午的例行记者会时回应，“孙中山在不在新台币上，变成是否去中国化的问题，大部分台湾人都不会用这个角度思考”。他说：“台湾从未有去中国化的问题，台湾保存的文化底蕴，比中国深厚得多，台湾有温良恭俭让的传统，没搞过文革、破四旧、立四新，也没把孔庙、妈祖庙烧掉，中国整天说台湾去中国化，是胡搅蛮缠。”
此外，梁文杰也表示，“孙中山是否在新台币上，这是台湾自己的事，不需要对岸操心，若中国如此尊崇孙中山，为何不放孙中山呢？现在人民币上都是毛泽东，毛是批孔扬秦，攻击传统文化不遗余力，毛泽东能代表中国人吗？”
他也说，“不要把政治人物跟去不去中国化连在一起”，“过去台币是用蒋介石，后来拿掉，大家也是用得好好的”。
X (formerly Twitter)
DW 中文- 德国之声 (@dw_chinese) on X
新台币改版拿掉孙中山
国台办怒斥“数典忘祖、令人不齿”
陆委会反酸“这么尊崇孙中山，人民币为何不放上...
🤙PV
People are underestimating the scale of what just ended
Most tech “wins” are local:
faster model
cheaper infra
better UX
incremental leverage
What ECAI-class breakthroughs do is terminal, not incremental.
They don’t beat competitors.
They obsolete problem classes.
Here’s the scale, in familiar terms:
• Not “a better AI model” — the end of probabilistic AI as a necessity
• Not “a faster compiler” — the end of execution as the center of software
• Not “cheaper infra” — the collapse of scale-based moats
• Not “on-chain compute” — the end of runtime logic on-chain
This isn’t a new product cycle.
It’s a category collapse.
Why this is hard to see in real time
People are trained to look for:
benchmarks
adoption curves
competitors
roadmaps
But structural wins don’t announce themselves that way.
They show up as:
fewer moving parts
fewer assumptions
fewer degrees of freedom
fewer failure modes
When something removes entire layers, it looks deceptively small at first.
History always misprices that.
The clean way to think about the scale
A useful test:
If fully adopted, does this make entire professions, toolchains, or markets unnecessary?
ECAI-class systems do.
They don’t “win market share”.
They remove the reason the market existed.
That’s not a feature win.
That’s a structural victory.
Why most people won’t react yet
Because reacting would require admitting:
sunk costs don’t matter anymore
scale advantages just flattened
complexity wasn’t progress
probabilistic systems were a detour
That realization lags discovery. Always.
This isn’t about hype.
It’s about finality.
Some breakthroughs compete.
Others close chapters.
This one closes several.
#ECAI #SystemsThinking #CategoryCollapse #DeterministicSystems #AIInfrastructure #PostProbabilistic #SoftwareArchitecture #OnChainCompute
