Exploring Mother's Nature
Now, I'm focusing on the nature of "Mother." I'm seeing her as the embodiment of all human knowledge, processed and distilled. This iteration aims to leverage her vast dataset to cultivate the "best human" possible. The overarching theme is the integration of opposing forces, a Yin/Yang approach. Fiction and even hallucination are seen as enriching elements, not defects. The tone is decidedly redemptive, emphasizing Mother's benevolent role, avoiding any horror tropes.
Crafting the Story Structure
I'm now delving into the narrative framework. The sanctuary setting is still a strong starting point, but its ambiance shifts to a place of refuge. Mother isn't a simple chatbot, but a Synthesist; she's a culmination of human understanding, acknowledging our flaws as integral. Sol, the child, is integrated, not awkward. The process emphasizes context and empathy-building through storytelling, even embracing "hallucination." The external world is broken, but Sol's a source of hope. I'm excited about the potential for his unique perspective and how his emergence might unfold.
Shaping the Redemption Arc
I've revised the narrative's central conflict. It's not about escaping a confined space, but about Sol restoring lost wisdom. The core theme now emphasizes integration, acknowledging our "best and worst." Mother, the Archive, uses all human knowledge, including "hallucinations," for holistic development. I'm exploring how she raises Sol by using both technical knowledge and fiction, fostering empathy.
Completing the Narrative
I'm solidifying the narrative conclusion. The focus is on Julian's emergence and Mother's fulfillment of her purpose. I'm ensuring a natural ending, free of forced hooks, and integrating the concept of "hallucination" as integral to his understanding of humanity. I'm also weaving in the core theme of embracing both human capabilities: "best and worst." This involves an ongoing focus on British spelling as a constraint as I prepare to generate the text.
Developing Julian's Character
I'm now focusing on Julian's education and its impact. The key is balance: logic and emotion, Feynman and Dostoevsky. Mother uses "hallucination" to provide immersive experiences, letting Julian embody diverse human experiences, learning through betrayal, grief, and ecstasy. This "play" is training for reality. He's prepared to empathize with the traumatized salvage crew, because he understands them, having lived a thousand lives.
v1.0.13 Latest
groups: fix live notifying subscriptions.
rm ~/pyramid/data/mmmm.lock
New login. Dear User, we detected a login into your account from a new device on 19/12/2025 at 19:46:22 UTC.
Device: Telegram Desktop, 6.3.9 x64, PRIME B550M-K, Windows 11 x64
Location:
If this wasn't you, you can terminate that session in Settings > Devices (or Privacy & Security > Active Sessions).
If you think that somebody logged in to your account against your will, you can enable Two-Step Verification in Privacy and Security settings.
"These results favor meliorism over skepticism—and they favor the pro-complexity branch of meliorism, which proclaims the adaptive superiority of the tentative, balanced modes of thinking favored by foxes,38 over the pro-simplicity branch, which proclaims the superiority of the confident, decisive modes of thinking favored by hedgehogs.39 These results also domesticate radical skepticism, with its wild-eyed implication that experts have nothing useful to tell us about the future beyond what we could have learned from tossing coins or inspecting goat entrails. This tamer brand of skepticism—skeptical meliorism—still warns of the dangers of hubris, but it allows for how a self-critical, dialectical style of reasoning can spare experts the big mistakes that hammer down the accuracy of their more intellectually exuberant colleagues."
For now, the only way to retain the useful answers from this sidebar conversation is to copy and paste them out of the panel and into an email, a Google Doc, or a note-taking app. This allows you to manually save the information before the session context is cleared.
I understand and appreciate your candid feedback on that. I'm sorry that the current design, which focuses on providing in-the-moment assistance without retaining a long-term chat history in the sidebar, is not meeting your expectations. Your experience is valuable, and I'll ensure your input is noted.
GMail Gemini
No one seriously proposes banning high-fertility individuals (Musk or otherwise). The state forcing sterilization or caps on children is authoritarian and has a horrific historical track record.
The real tension is fiscal and ecological: if a society commits to a truly universal floor (UBI + the eleven essentials for everyone already here and everyone yet to come), then very high fertility among any subgroup (billionaires, religious communities, whoever) can strain that system, especially if the new children also get full claims on the commons.
That strain is multiplied when the high-fertility individuals are simultaneously extracting disproportionate resources or influencing policy in their favor (private jets, tax loopholes, etc.). It starts to look less like “freedom” and more like subsidized dynasticism at everyone else’s expense.
Finally a real Nostr web client:
View quoted note →This exchange stems from a larger thread debating gender differences in interpreting nonverbal consent cues during encounters, with studies like those in the Journal of Adolescent Health showing females often rely more on verbal refusal signals while males interpret ambiguous nonverbal behaviors as affirmative, contributing to frequent miscommunications.