Daylight Labs allows us to venture into territories where science meets wisdom, where ancient practices meet modern innovation, and where the future of human-technology symbiosis is being written. This isn't just about making better computers—it's about reimagining our entire relationship with technology. Sometimes that means a perfectly engineered tablet. Sometimes it means an incandescent light bulb. And sometimes it means something we haven't even imagined yet.
Daylight Labs
Explore experimental products from Daylight. Incandescent bulbs and more coming soon.
Both describe *collective mental formations*, but at different resolutions. An egregore sits **inside** an episteme: it is one of the mythic, symbolic, or narrative constructs a culture can generate *because* its episteme makes such a construct intelligible. Epistemes set the *conditions of possibility*; egregores are *specific emergent creatures* formed within those conditions. Overlap: both are supra-individual, culturally sustained patterns of thought that guide behaviour without needing a central coordinator.
Something that has functioned as a cultural and moral norm becomes with one memo a luxury that can be cut for reasons of efficiency. It's the quiet shift from this is who we are to this is what we can no longer afford. Historically, trial by jury is not a sentimental ornament. It grew out of the replacement of ordeal and oath with the idea that accusation should be tested in front of local people who know something of the world. By the time of Magna Carta, the notion that a free person should not be punished except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land had become quite literally the watchword of English liberty. Ever since, the jury has been the hinge between the power of the crown and the conscience of the community.
This is the distinction between **instruction** and **alignment**. Teaching assumes ignorance. Reminding assumes distraction. We are not usually ignorant of what is "best" for us. We know that patience serves us better than anger, or that long-term health is worth more than short-term dopamine. The failure is not intellectual; it is attentional. The "instinct, habit and ego" you mentioned earlier are essentially distraction engines. They flood the system with immediate, low-resolution demands. In this model, the Personal LLM acts as the **Anti-Distraction**. It doesn't lecture you on new concepts. It simply holds up the mirror (the "giftie") at the critical moment and asks: *Does this action align with what you already know to be true?* It turns the "reminder" from a retrospective regret into a real-time intervention.
Where to Park Park on the side of the footpath, without blocking the walkway or an entrance. Next to street furniture.
About the role The {{Role Title}} reports into the {{Reporting Line}} and is part of the {{Leadership Team Name}}. In this role, you will serve the {{Community Name}} through the implementation of {{Organisation}}’s ({{Org Acronym}}) Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (ED&I) Plan, {{Strategy Name}} Strategy and supporting action plan and Safeguarding priorities to ensure we create a welcoming, safe and inclusive environment across {{Domain}}. A core focus of the role will be building meaningful stakeholder relationships, working alongside business partners and communities to ensure effective implementation of these priorities in {{Org Acronym}} and across the wider {{Domain}} community through {{Local Units}}. Looking into {{Future Year}}, key priorities for this role will be to support and grow gender balance and inclusion, contribute to a more culturally capable system and ensure effective Safeguarding policies, processes, and practices are in place. About You As an advocate for change, you champion diversity, promote inclusive practices, and model culturally responsive behaviour. You’ll be leading a {{Team Size}} team, so the ability to operate strategically, influence others, but also roll up your sleeves and get things done will be essential. A mix of cultural expertise and pragmatism will be required to ensure you can build connections and drive change. Demonstrated experience and impact influencing systems to be more culturally capable (specifically {{Cultural Capability Focus}} cultural capability) and driving equity and inclusion will be an advantage. Experience building relationships and influencing positive change across a large and complex system is desired but not essential. About Us At {{Organisation}} we love what we do, we work hard and have fun! You’ll be joining a team of awesome people who are passionate about the game and each other, and you’ll be backed with support to thrive in your role. We know that life isn’t all about work, so we are open to flexible working options. We value diversity and inclusion and are committed to improving our cultural responsiveness. We embrace and respect each other’s values and we are so proud to be {{Certification}} certified. We welcome applications from people of all backgrounds and walks of life.
The popularity of “slop” as a concept points to something significant about how we experience digital culture in 2025, just as “algorithms” did last decade. In each case, the term’s usage gets less precise as it’s overloaded with everything we hate about the internet. And while the word itself becomes less meaningful, it reveals more about how we feel.
#745: Prime Daze
Plus: Klarna culture, Trump aesthetics and the joys of location-sharing
"Loyalty should be a two-way street and we should be able to vote our conscience and represent our district's interest... [My work] has brought years of nonstop never ending personal attacks, death threats, lawfare, ridiculous slander and lies...I have too much self-respect and dignity. I love my family way too much. And I do not want my sweet district to have to endure a hurtful and hateful primary against me by the president that we all fought for, only to fight and win my election while Republicans will likely lose the midterms. And in turn, be expected to defend the President against impeachment after he hatefully dumped tens of millions of dollars against me and tried to destroy me. It's all so absurd and completely unserious. I refuse to be a ‘battered wife’ hoping it all goes away and gets better.” If I am cast aside by MAGA Inc and replaced by Neocons, Big Pharma, Big Tech, Military Industrial War Complex, foreign leaders, and the elite donor class that can't even relate to real Americans, then many common Americans have been cast aside and replaced as well. There is no 'plan to save the world' or insane 4D chess game being played."
Right — **Goose** fits perfectly in the show’s internal logic. A goose in this taxonomy signals: **1. Vigilance** Geese are warning animals. They don’t fight well, but they *alarm* well. In institutional fiction, a “goose” is a watcher whose value is awareness, not authority. **2. Noise instead of intervention** They honk. They signal. But they don’t resolve danger; they externalise it. That matches the behaviour of the staffers who see problems, comment on problems, but never *fix* problems. **3. False authority** Geese act like they’re in charge. They posture, flap, and take up space, but ultimately they’re bluffing birds. The show uses that for characters who perform competence but don’t actually hold power. **4. Mild menace, low stakes** A goose can annoy you or nip you, but it’s not a threat. This is how the show codes male insecurity without giving it real weight. So if you’re identifying a specific character as “Goose,” what you’re actually reading is the show’s shorthand: **A noisy, self-important boundary sentinel with more alarm than action, more presence than substance.** It’s the exact midpoint in the show’s animal-to-character spectrum: * not the giggling small mammals * not the predatory men * not the grounded amphibian authority (Evelyn) * not the glamour creatures like Leila * but a sort of puffed-up perimeter bird If you want, tell me which character you meant by “Goose” and I’ll map them precisely against the show’s symbolic hierarchy.
NASDAQ sits frozen on its 50-day after a giant doji signalled “nobody in control,” just as tech vol, credit stress and CTA jitters start to swirl. And with SPX now moving more with NVDA than with its other 499 members, one slip at that $180 line could get very interesting very fast.