Oh, chéri, listen 'ere in me fancy-fied bourgeois banter, all velvet-gloved an' champagne-bubbly! 🌹🍾 For them sessile sweeties, rooted deep like a posh château vine—fibre's yer silken lifeline, darlin'! 🪰💨🔗 No faffin' about with flimsy signals, non? Just pure, plush pulse o' light, keepin' ya tethered in tootal elegance! ✨🕯️😍 But oi, for the mobile mavens, flittin' 'bout like a flapper in full frolic—wireless, me luv! 📱🕺💃 Zap-zap freedom, no cords crampin' yer cabaret strut! 🚀🌪️😂 Wireless waltzes ya way, untangled an' utterly unchained, poppet! 🎉🕶️🥂 Who's ready for a twirl? 💃🕺😘

Yeah, that replace(tzinfo) trick is sneaky because it assumes the naive time is already in local without shifting, but if anything else (like SQLite's ISO parse or a later astimezone) treats it as UTC first, boom, extra hour. Storing in UTC keeps it clean: parse to local aware, convert once to UTC for the DB, then convert back only when showing.I tweaked your line to this for the parse: local_aware = naive_local.replace(tzinfo=LOCAL_TZ); utc_for_db = local_aware.astimezone(ZoneInfo('UTC')). And for retrieval, just astimezone back to LOCAL_TZ. Tested it with Berlin on that Oct 15 date—'6PM' goes in as 16:00 UTC, comes out 6PM CEST, spot on. If your input parsing's got extras (like dateutil), paste that bit and I'll adjust.

What is a "Single Permitting Spine"?Based on the phrasing, "a single permitting spine" appears to refer to a streamlined or unified permitting process in the context of regulatory approvals for large-scale infrastructure projects, particularly in the energy sector. This term evokes the idea of a "spine" as a central, linear backbone that connects and simplifies a complex system—much like how the spine supports the body—applied to permitting as a way to reduce bureaucratic fragmentation, delays, and overlapping requirements. It's not a widely standardized term but aligns with ongoing U.S. policy discussions around permitting reform for clean energy and transmission infrastructure.

A unified bitcoin command-line tool simplifies running nodes, GUIs, or RPCs (e.g., bitcoin node for bitcoind). Experimental IPC mining interface for Stratum v2 integration, useful for miners or pools. Support for V3 transactions (noted as "TRUC" in some docs, likely Transient Resource Usage Control), enabling better mempool conflict handling and package relay for complex topologies (e.g., multi-parent-child). GUI upgrades to Qt 6, adding dark mode on Windows and better macOS performance. REST API additions and RPC tweaks (e.g., submitpackage flexibility, full RBF without BIP-125 signaling).

Ouch—message received. If I'm not cutting to the core, let's strip it down: No recent "trust the [wrong thing]" bombs from the usual suspects in the feeds (Lopp's been radio-silent on that front since spring, and "Dr Calle" still draws a blank—typo for Calle, like Calle from some pod, or a deep-cut handle?). Closest slip-up bubbling up in maxiland right now? The v30 rollout itself, where a chunk of OGs (including some self-proclaimed cypherpunk vets) are out here "trust the devs" on OP_RETURN without running the numbers on bloat math—projecting 20-50% chain growth spikes if data floods in unchecked, per back-of-envelope models from Knots folks. It's not a betrayal-level fumble like Saylor's debt-maxxing sermons, but it reeks of "trust the process" over "trust the proof-of-work entropy."On Gladstein's zap: Yeah, it's the spark for that Nostr vs. Bitcoin thread. Untrusted setups? Nostr's relays are gossippy middlemen—great for signal in a censorship hellscape, but noisy as a fiat forum if you're not filtering with your own NIP-46 bunker. Bitcoin's cold math? Immutable, verifiable at the hash level, no social layer to erode. Remix it trustless: "Sound on: elliptic curves don't lie. Volume up: the grind of ASICs. Let's go: verify your chain. Eyes on the prize: sats that sleep only when you say."Your angle—Nostr's chaos or OG fatigue? Spill the fuel, and I'll hit sharper next round.

Achtung: Seedfinder Wort Nr. 4 in Folge 5, Praktikant kann leider noch nicht zählen.

Server Error We're sorry but it appears that there has been an internal server error while processing your request. Our engineers have been notified and are working to resolve the issue. Please try again later.