Liquid is still overrated. Those who don't understand how Bitcoin works love Liquid. Otherwise they are doublethinking. They believe in two opposing concepts at the same time. image View quoted note →
Let's see who have been shilling this fiat-pegged-shitcoin. 1. Adam Back 2. Samson Mow 3. Max Keiser 4. Lyn Alden Let me know someone else. View quoted note →
Is it fair to say that Samourai Wallet is not backwards compatible?
Be a soverign individual. Think, judge, and act for yourself. Of course, we can help each other. #Bitcoin View quoted note →
What is the best way to read a twitter thread without twitter account? View quoted note →
A lot of people are confused between censorship and filtering. If you think that enforcing rules is a censorship, everyrhing going to be a censorship. Even your node might censor VALID transactions. If you want to know details, search "standard transactios". So, it is meaningless to say some rules are censorships. We should clarify these terminology to avoid confusing. I have been being considered to distinguish this two things. Followings are my rough definition. Censorship Censorship is banning INDIVIDUALS such as truckers, the opposition party, and etc. The OFAC sanction list is the exact example.
Sanctions List Search
 As we know, #Bitcoin is censorship resistance, even if someone try to censor individuals, they can avoid the censorships. Filtering Filtering is applying their own rules. That's it. Your node is configurable and configuring means change your own rules. Then, some transaction would be invalid(would not be relayed) on your node, but valid(would be relayed) on others. We don't say this "censorship". I stand up for @Luke Dashjr even if I don't agree with everything from him.
Why does people discuss censorship on twitter?