This is what you see in the UK on a lot of posts relating to the Islamic attack in Australia. What is your opinion of this example? Does it warrant censoring? "Bondi Beach and the Return of Open Season on Jews "What happened at Bondi Beach [...] was the foreseeable consequence of months of moral abdication. Of a Leftist-Islamist alliance that turned rage into virtue and hatred into justice." There was no ambiguity about what happened at Bondi Beach. Jewish families gathered openly to celebrate Hanukkah. Men arrived with rifles and turned it into a killing ground, leaving twelve people dead. This was not a border dispute, a policy protest, or a clash of armed factions. It was a mass shooting at a Jewish religious celebration, in the open air. The target tells you everything you need to know. We are told to wait for motive, to suspend judgement, to keep our language soft. But motive does not arise in a vacuum. Since October 7, Jews across the West have warned that something had shifted. Not disagreement. Not criticism. Permission. The permission to treat Jews as symbols rather than people. To speak of them as a problem to be managed, an obstacle to justice, a stain on the moral landscape. Once that line is crossed, violence becomes only a matter of time. The massacre of October 7 did not just murder Israelis. It detonated something far wider. A pogrom was turned into a movement. A terror attack was rebranded as "context." Rape was debated. Murder was explained. The dead were weighed, measured, and morally discounted. From campuses to concert stages, Jewish symbols were fused with Nazi ones. Chants calling for "intifada" were waved through as passion. Politicians looked away. Institutions flinched. The message was received. This is how hatred spreads in polite societies. Not through jackboots, but through euphemism. Not through orders, but through excuses. Not through open calls for murder, but through endless moral inversion, until the victim is recast as villain and violence becomes thinkable. Nobody needs to say "go and shoot Jews at a beach." All that is required is a culture that says Jews no longer count as innocents. Bondi did not happen despite the climate. It happened because of it. For months, Jewish communities have been told that their fear is exaggerated, that they are confusing criticism with hatred, that they should be quieter, less visible, less Jewish. They were told that marching crowds chanting threats were merely expressing anger. They were told that fusing swastikas with Stars of David was "art." They were told to stop centring themselves. And now they are told to wait again, to be patient again, to lower their voices again, even as bodies are carried from a Hanukkah celebration. What happened at Bondi Beach was not an accident of history. It was the foreseeable consequence of months of moral abdication. Of a Leftist-Islamist alliance that turned rage into virtue and hatred into justice. Of media, politicians, cultural figures, and activists who treated antisemitism as a minor inconvenience so long as it came dressed as politics. Of leaders who mistook silence for neutrality. Bondi Beach should end the pretending. If it does not, there will be more vigils, more statements, more promises of reflection, and more blood on the pavement. History does not need to be guessed at here. It has already shown us where this road goes." image
image
Europe was the cradle of humanity and all important developments took place here and in the Levant There is probably a good reason why Europe has historically been the powerhouse for new ideas and technical innovation
Every year, we celebrate the coming of Odin in the guise of Father Christmas Our mythical figure of Father Christmas is really no more than a modern incarnation of Odin, the chief god of the Nordic peoples. The earliest evidence for this was found in the London district of Dagenham.
Most Muslims in the West don’t wake up strategizing how to take over the world. But they’ve been conditioned to view Islamic norms as inherently superior. That superiority doesn’t disappear at the border. It travels in the luggage of language, customs, assumptions, and sacred texts. And eventually, it seeps into local politics, social demands, and institutional pressure, slowly, passively, invisibly. This is how the system reproduces itself without meetings, leaders, or manifestos. It doesn’t need central command when the psychology is collective and the doctrine is divine. Muslims in the West don’t have to organize a coup to alter the cultural landscape. All they have to do is continue being who the system trained them to be: People who defer to divine authority over secular law, who view freedom of speech as dangerous, who see dissent as blasphemy, and who feel morally justified in pressuring the host society to bend to their religious sensitivities. In Islam, there is no separation. Religion is government. Religion is law. Religion is identity. The West doesn’t need to fear a conspiracy, it needs to fear complacency. Because what we’re facing isn’t a war of weapons. It’s a war of worldviews. One side believes the individual is sovereign. The other believes Allah is. One side encourages doubt, dissent, and open debate. The other treats them as disease. One side builds freedom from the inside out. The other demands submission from the top down. So no, there’s no secret plan. But that’s what makes it more dangerous. Because you can fight a conspiracy. You can expose a plot. But how do you fight a collective subconscious, when most of the people carrying it don’t even know they are? image
Drone footage of the Islamic terrorists getting neutralised by local police at Bondi Beach.
image
A man appears to stomp on a suspected terrorist. And yes, gets arrested!
image