image
Note the difference in Language used by the Met Police when UKIP were going to protest in Tower Hamlets: "Concerns of serious disorder have prompted the Metropolitan Police to intervene and prevent a demonstration from taking place in Tower Hamlets this weekend." When a pro-Palestine protest in St John's Wood near the Synagogue. "There is no legal mechanism to ban the protest from taking place; however, we have used Public Order Act conditions to prevent disorder and disruption." Is this policing equally? What is the reason for the difference? image
Is ’white flight’ a slow-motion form of ethnic cleansing? The transfer of the majority white population from geographical areas in Britain, and their replacement by other ethnic groups continues apace, with disturbing implications
How white people in Britain are making black people become diabetic The Bank of England believes that so-called micro-aggressions can cause diabetes…
The art of race-baiting without being called out on it There are, in Britain and the United States, many attempts to stir up discord between white people and ethnic minorities. The chief culprits though are those who are supposedly progressive and anti-racist. Delgado, Richard; Stefancic, Jean (2017) Critical Race Theory : an introduction (Third ed.). New York.
Britain is becoming more racist, says Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood If you provide sanctuary to *anyone*, in return, they murder you, rape your women and children, blow you up, mow you down, demand you work longer and harder to house, feed and clothe them, whilst calling you names, and then implement laws to send you to prison for complaining, people will eventually get utterly pissed off. It wouldn't matter if it were a million white, blonde, blue-eyed Scandinavians doing this; the hospitality and the good nature of the hosts has been abused, and everyone has had enough. Keep calling people racist, please, it now alerts the vast majority to someone saying something that needs saying, and in most instances, probably is 100% true! gimmigrants will sit on benefits, be rude, violent, as that's in their nature and specific to the cultures they're from. They would be totally dumbfounded by what we would point out as criminal and morally repugnant behaviour; however, some have been here for a few generations and still behave like this! This is covered for and excused by the media and a ruling class insulated from its effects If you cannot talk about a problem, how can you solve it? https://archive.ph/lHfTQ
"We are in deep, dark shit. There is no other way to describe it. It will be painful. Very painful. Politicians need to be honest about that. " It’s called ‘quantitative easing’, a fancy way of saying printing money and we need to ban it. Inflation is a cancer. A tax that wipes out wages, savings, pensions. It makes life more expensive. Here is the honest truth. You cannot fight inflation by taxing people more and growing the state. You can only fight inflation by cutting the size of the state itself. If we want to bring down the cost of living, we need to start telling the truth. The full post by Rupert Lowe MP image
Worried about your taxes going up and the cost of living increasing? Rachel Reeves says you’re “mansplaining”. Rupert Lowe MP "Rachel Reeves genuinely said this - "I’m sick of people mansplaining how to be chancellor to me." Rachel. Nobody serious is criticising you because you are a woman. OBVIOUSLY. We criticise you because you are incompetent - there is a clear and important difference. Go and tell the millions of British women who run their own businesses that their criticism of you is 'mansplaining'. How your incessant tax rises, your pointless regulation, your economic 'leadership', is making their lives SO much more difficult. For many? They've had to pack it in. Their dream of running a small business, finished. Directly because of the changes you have imposed on the economy. It is YOUR fault. So, yes. Go and tell these women that their criticisms are sexist. Good luck. Please do let me know how you get on. I sit across from Reeves in Parliament, intently listening. It is so much worse in person. She exudes fear. No confidence, no assertiveness, no clue. She just does not understand the reality of what she is forcing on the country. Would I hire Reeves? No. Would I do business with her? Absolutely not. Woefully out of her depth. It's got nothing to do with her sex. It's got everything to do with her lack of ability. This isn't sexist or 'mansplaining'. This is the truth." image
image
The BBC The article opens by saying he’s being investigated “for his comments”.. which clearly makes it sound like he wrote the messages. But scroll down and suddenly the truth appears.. the comments were made by other people in a WhatsApp group he was simply added to. He didn’t write them. He didn’t join in. He didn’t even see them. The BBC is staffed by people who know exactly how to use the English language. These are professional writers, editors, and headline specialists who can be incredibly precise and descriptive when they want to be. Yet we’re supposed to believe this wording.. “being investigated for his comments” was just an innocent choice of phrasing? This wasn’t accidental. It was crafted to mislead. just enough to smear, not enough to be sued. Same BBC tactics. Same BBC spin. And still pretending they’re neutral.