image
Require non-stunned and stunned meat to be labelled accordingly We think it should be required that the labelling of non-stunned and stunned meat be clearly labelled throughout the food chain. This includes shops, supermarkets, suppliers, fast food and restaurants This would include labels on every product available to consumers We think UK government should implement mandatory method of slaughter labelling for all meat products Stunned or Non-Stunned. For all industries linked to food, including but not limited to shops, supermarkets, schools, restaurants, fast food, cafes and suppliers We think this promotes consumer choice, enhances transparency, especially for religion and ethics We think no one should be forced to consume food which doesn't meet their ethical and religious choices, they should have the right to choose without prejudice
Think Before You Post | How the UK fell to a sinister new form of censorship | FULL DOCUMENTARY ‘Think before you post.’ Those were the words screamed out by government social-media accounts, threatening to lock up people for ‘hate speech’, as riots swept the United Kingdom in the summer of 2024. To those who hadn’t been paying attention, it offered a stark insight into a supposedly liberal, democratic nation that had come to police speech as much as, sometimes even more so, than actual violence. Inciting racial hatred, inciting religious hatred, ‘grossly offensive’ online communications – over the past 60 years or so, Britain has written one new speech crime after another into its statute books. And it has led to a situation in which at least 30 people a day are now arrested in England and Wales for social-media posts.
On the 9th October 2025, The National newspaper published an article entitled "'I'll slit your throats': Scots anti-racism campaigners threatened while removing lamppost flags". We know that if this actually happened, then the Police would certainly be interested – and they would respond to the incident immediately if they could – and they would follow it up. They would definitely have a record! Therefore, to confirm events, we contacted Police Scotland, under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002, with a copy of The National article. We asked specifically: a) Were Police Scotland indeed contacted by these people "during the incident" as they claim; or perhaps after the incident? b) Did the Police attend the scene of the incident at the time, or at a later date? c) If so, was anyone arrested on the scene, or arrested at a later date for such affray? d) What is the status of this incident – for example, is it going to court? e) Is there a crime reference number for this incident, and if so may I have it please? On 10th November 2025 we received the following precise response, from Police Scotland, FOI 25-3482: "We have no record of this matter being reported to Police Scotland. The information sought is not held by Police Scotland and section 17 of the Act therefore applies." https://www.aforceforgood.uk/single-post/sutr-lies
You would think that banning a documentary about free speech would be a bad look for a cultural institution. But that’s precisely what Rich Mix in east London has just done. We were all set to hold the premiere of our documentary, Think Before You Post, about the rise of the British speech police, at Rich Mix on Tuesday 25 November. But last night, we received an email saying the venue would be ‘terminating [our] booking contract’.
Climate activists in Strasbourg, France, ruined a Christmas display by smearing the Christmas tree with paint. They are when you give their cult even a cursory glance Marxist fanatics hiding behind the climate scam
Edinburgh University yesterday. Imagine the uproar if anyone wrecked Ramadan events over anger at Islamist actions at home and abroad. If the diversity barriers and armed police weren’t enough, like last year, Christmas events have already started to be hit.
An Isle of Wight police officer kept an innocent businessman in a jail cell despite knowing he had been wrongfully arrested, a jury has heard. Jurors were told how private security boss Benjamin Churchill spent time in custody even though PC Martin knew he had done nothing wrong. Following a 'professional disagreement' on December 10, Mr Churchill reported PC Martin for intimidating behaviour. Subsequently PC Martin, a specialist dog handler in Newport, sent an email to numerous colleagues. He said he was suspicious of Mr Churchill's involvement with drugs, and said that they should follow up on any reports of him using excessive force. https://archive.ph/6ydwR
‘Our free-speech documentary has been cancelled!’ Think Before You Post, our new doc about the rise of the British speech police, was due to have its premiere in London next week Now, the venue – Rich Mix – has dropped us, claiming the event does not align with its ‘values’
image