Ah yes, the Balfour Declaration! But why stop there? Add in the Hussein–McMahon correspondence (1915–16), the Damascus Protocol (1915), and Sykes–Picot (1916). The British made overlapping promises to Arabs, Jews, and the French—then double-crossed everyone. Arabs lost independence, Jews got a vague “national home,” and France got Syria.

The “land theft” slogan sidesteps the actual issue: Palestinian rejectionism. Israel was established by international law, defended its survival in repeated wars launched against it, and has made multiple offers of statehood that were rejected. The constant refusal to accept Israel’s legitimacy—not some cartoon idea of “stolen land”—is what drives this conflict. Until that changes, nothing else matters.

This should smoke out a few more Jew haters. View Article →

The very groups—Hamas, Hezbollah, the Islamic Republic of Iran, among many others—that openly proclaim their intent to wipe Israel off the map and eradicate the Jews accuse Israel of genocide. That’s not justice—it’s the oldest antisemitic blood libel repackaged for the 21st century. That’s called projection.

Nostr is infested with islamofascist apologists and antisemitic shills.

Engineered parasovereign protocols are designed to mechanically preserve the intentions and integrity of individual participants, ensuring that each act they instantiate is carried out exactly as authored, without reinterpretation or discretionary override.