Basically, the men I listed in the previous post are not business leaders, they are brokers. And they are selling a security I own without a brokerage agreement with me. As I can not sell my own social security number or whatever of my own data points, the same way I can not sell a security as I do not have a license to do so (I sell or buy through a brokerage firm) it means I need or have a right to a broker to sell on my behalf. If a broker is selling a security I own without an agreement they are operating illegally.
And do not come to me complaining about t’s & c’s. Why do you think the t’s & c’s are hundreds of pages long? Because there are that many holes to fill. If there are so many holes, it means they can’t statistically fill all of them. If they could fill all of them, there would never be any litigation, which there is, and sometimes they lose despite the encyclopedia of t’s & c’s.
I do not care what I checked in order to participate. Believe me, there is a hole.
Judges are biased so it is not even necessary to have a clever lawyer; it is only necessary to have a lawyer the judge respects. Judges aren’t for the most part mentally disciplined enough to judge arguments they side with the mouth they prefer not the words. Pick the right mouth.
