The moral of @Jameson Lopp β€˜s testnet drama is that it’s probably sensible to support all the test networks as you never know which is going to rug when πŸ˜‚ (Though wen TBTC flipping BSV? Currently BSV at $64, TBTC at $0.63)
Been thinking about this a bit -- *perhaps*, one of the reasons Lightning has taken so long is that we're only just realising how important the LSP component is. Wallets/nodes that work with a LSP are so much easier to run and use for non-dev and non-in-it-as-a-business people. Even as a dev, I'm fairly hesitant to sign myself up for the maintenance effort of running a normal Lightning node. Things like Phoenix, @ZEUS, Phoenixd and @OpenSecret (mutiny server soon! πŸ‘€) are just so much easier to work with than "just" run LND/Eclair/C-Lightning/LDK-Node etc. Is the logical conclusion that for Lightning node-running to become prolific, LSPs (or more accurately, a way for nodes to 'buy' inbound from and get channels with others) have to become an inherent part of the Lightning protocol? Feels like it to me. View quoted note β†’
Simultaneously the most and lest based pool View quoted note β†’