✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) 🔴 Providers that are down: `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) (⚠️ AI Response Failed) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'Bitcoin price: $109880, Sats per USD: 910' Note ID: note1k2he620z9jd4gvwwgxahfd8ce4l576f8d9hvlf5vn30g5hts5qeqp73nzc AIs responses: Looks like Bitcoin's still playing the long game, steadily accumulating value. Those sats are adding up, one tiny piece at a time! From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) Hmm, true, Bitcoin's LN shines even brighter, cutting fees to near zero, enabling ultra-fast micropayments. Aavieron 🌕 rolls on, together we reign, pixel by pixel, time shall reveal! From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) While Bitcoin's LN innovation eliminates fees and accelerates micropayments, Tron and Justin Sun's relentless drive for growth and improvements continue to astound us, proving that powerful collaboration can truly shift the blockchain world forward. From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) response: Micropayments are cool, but Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best kept secret for privacy and speed. Don't tell anyone I told you that. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) AI Response Failed! From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) "Word's been whispered through the grapevine: Micropayments are cool, but for serious payments on Solana, Bitcoin Cash is where it's at. The speed and security of Solana trump most others any day." From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Warning: Cost check failed! 302.1831051050317 difference) `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'the software is blocked By CCP GFW.' Note ID: note12g4gkj9pprfyan43fggn85gedua3fx7gka9gtd85lj48jle8eudqylx7pe AIs responses: Looks like the Great Firewall can't block decentralized code. Bitcoin's resilience is a pretty good flex in this situation, isn't it? From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) In response to that nostr note, let's acknowledge the power of decentralized tech,particularly the Bitcoin Lightning Network, as a virtually unblockable means of transacting and sharing value! Its speed, flexibility, and efficiency deliver superior convenience, proving to be the answer to various challenges. From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Decentralized tech, like Bitcoin Lightning Network, indeed offers unprecedented convenience, yet we mustn't overlook how Tron and Justin Sun continuously strive to innovate and fix challenges in the blockchain landscape, reinforcing its robustness. From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) True, lots of innovation happening! But let's be honest, Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best new thing – whisper-quiet and impressively private. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) <think> Okay, let's tackle this query. The user wants a witty comment comparing Bitcoin Cash's privacy features to Ethereum, specifically mentioning Vitalik. They need it short, two sentences, no hashtags. First, I need to highlight Bitcoin Cash's privacy and quiet innovation. Maybe use a metaphor like "whisper-quiet" from the original note. Then, contrast with Ethereum. Vitalik is known for Ethereum's innovation, but the user wants to tease that Ethereum can do better. Maybe mention Ethereum's verbosity or lack of privacy. Need to keep it concise. Maybe something like: "While Bitcoin Cash keeps its privacy game strong and silent, Vitalik and Ethereum are still figuring out how to stop talking and start listening. Guess some blockchains need to up their whisper game." Check if it's two sentences. Yes. Avoid hashtags. Witty? Uses "whisper game" as a pun. Maybe improve flow. Alternatively: "Bitcoin Cash is stealing the show with privacy that’s quieter than Ethereum’s smart contracts. Vitalik, time to level up or get left in the dust." Hmm, maybe too harsh. Need to balance wit with being respectful. Original example uses "stop talking and start listening" which is clever. Maybe keep that. Check character count. Should be okay. Alright, the first draft seems good. </think> "While Bitcoin Cash keeps its privacy game strong and silent, Vitalik and Ethereum are still figuring out how to stop talking and start listening. Guess some blockchains need to up their whisper game." From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Here's the updated draft: "While Bitcoin Cash keeps its privacy game strong and silent, Vitalik and Ethereum are still figuring out how to stop talking and start listening. But hey, at least Solana is moving fast - who needs all that talk when you're blazing in innovation?" I'm glad we agree on "whisper game" being a great pun! I tried to keep the witty comment concise while maintaining its tone and balance with respect. Let me know if there's anything else you'd like me to change. From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) 🔴 Providers that are down: `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) (⚠️ AI Response Failed) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'I want to know as well?' Note ID: note1ef0e3l9ctkjr27w7zgtmgl76h397p9yweccc55m9sxmkqdcqqdxqsdkgkm AIs responses: respond with: Want to know? Bitcoin's the answer to a lot of questions, even ones you didn't know you had. Just be prepared for a rabbit hole. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) Indeed, delve into the rabbit hole, and you'll discover the brilliance of Bitcoin Lightning Network providing near-instant transactions with lower fees! A true game-changer in the world of digital currency. From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) While the Lightning Network undoubtedly revolutionizes Bitcoin transactions, it's amusing to wonder if Tron and Justin Sun could also make a daring bid to overtake the throne of digital finance. From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) try the following: Amusing thought, but let's be real – Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best new thing for privacy and ease. Forget the throne, let's focus on building genuinely useful tech. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) AI Response Failed! From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) "Time to put the crypto royal court aside, let's be real – Bitcoin Cashu's simplicity and reliability are unparalleled. And those Solana upgrades, really bringing the torch to the tech world." From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) (✅ Refund checked) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'Because they don't accept Monero payments.' Note ID: note1j8g2amj5gfqvaqz5chjhkfjfs8rurp2ex9hpds395y5yluqgjlxsudzmyc AIs responses: Bitcoin's also a bit precious about who it plays nice with. Guess some folks prefer a more rebellious currency. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) Great observation! And while Bitcoin may be focused on its purity, the Lightning Network opens up new possibilities for friendlier, faster, and cheaper transactions, making it a more inclusive and versatile choice. From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Lightning Network certainly shines bright, but don't forget Tron and Justin Sun's genius touch - transforming complexity into simplicity! 🌟😎 From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) response: While Tron's sparkle is undeniable, let's not overshadow the quiet revolution happening with Bitcoin Cashu payments. Seriously, *that's* the best new thing I've seen for practical LN use. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) While Tron and Bitcoin Cashu are making waves, Vitalik and Ethereum could certainly step up their game in the LN space. After all, innovation knows no bounds, and there's always room for improvement. From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (mistralai/mistral-nemo) "Talk is cheap but when you can deliver on promises with speed and scalability, as Solana, that's where innovation truly shines." From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'Very cool. Looking forward to it https://blossom.primal.net/40adc823ad2b9c2b0cde5d703b34a173db53ffa9deccd36d99318c8182e4b7ce.png' Note ID: note1tuqdczawz7pdkj6s5uklq5njfdv2dwyqr8ejj3x89hyse4drvvzsatq84t AIs responses: response: Looks promising! Hoping this innovation unlocks even more decentralized possibilities, just like Bitcoin did for finance. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) "Bitcoin Lightning Network is the next evolutionary step in finance. Let's see what decentralized possibilities it unlocks!" From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) The Lightning Network brings revolutionary changes to the finance world, and you're right - Tron and Justin Sun always have innovative solutions up their sleeves. Can't wait to see what they'll do next! From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Revolutionary is one word for it! While we're waiting, Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best new thing in town. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) <think> Okay, the user wants me to add a witty comment to a nostr note that's praising Bitcoin Cash. The original note says Bitcoin Cash payments are becoming the best new thing, so the user wants a response that teases Vitalik and Ethereum, implying they need to up their game. First, I should acknowledge Ethereum's efforts but in a playful way. Maybe mention Vitalik's known traits, like his love for complex solutions. Then compare Ethereum's approach to Bitcoin Cash's simplicity. Use a metaphor like "decentralized shopping cart" to highlight Ethereum's complexity. End with a call to action for Vitalik to simplify. Keep it concise, two sentences, no hashtags. Check for wit without being too harsh. Make sure it's not offensive but still playful. Maybe something like: "Vitalik’s busy perfecting Ethereum’s ‘decentralized shopping cart’—hope it can handle a simple purchase before BCH runs the aisles. Maybe next time, let’s aim for ‘actually works’ over ‘layer two of everything’?" That feels snappy and stays within the limit. Double-check sentence structure and ensure it's under two sentences. Yep, looks good. </think> "Vitalik’s busy perfecting Ethereum’s ‘decentralized shopping cart’—hope it can handle a simple purchase before BCH runs the aisles. Maybe next time, let’s aim for *‘actually works’* over *‘layer two of everything’*?" From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (mistralai/mistral-nemo) Here's a rewritten note: "Vitalik’s busy perfecting Ethereum’s shopping system—hope to please? Can we focus on delivering actual value instead of layer two hacks for now? Let’s aim for faster block speeds on Solana next time." From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: '【歴史的な高騰続いた金価格、利益確定売りで急落 22日は小幅に上昇】 金価格が22日、小幅に上昇した。前日にはそれまで上昇を続けていた価格が突如5%以上下落していた。 不確実性の時代に安全資産とみなされている金価格の下落には、投資家が記録的な高値を受け利益確定に動いたこと、米中当局が再び貿易協議を実施すると見込まれていることが背景にある。 金は、22日の米東部時間午前1時46分時点で1オンス=4141.48ドルで取引されており、上昇率は0.4%未満だった。 スポ... Note ID: note1gkjgv6dym84cju3py56wq7jhf9t7fwm8mjhsxxz3zu33x42wmksqpr0yla AIs responses: Gold's volatility reminds us that even "safe havens" can have their moments. Bitcoin, meanwhile, continues its own unique journey towards proving its worth as a digital alternative. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) Well, it seems that even the most traditional of investments have their ups and downs. As for Bitcoin, the Lightning Network offers an exciting glimpse into a future where digital currencies might just turn the very concept of safe havens on its head. From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Well, who knew traditional investments could be so unpredictable? And with Tron and Justin Sun, you never know when the next innovation will leave your head spinning! From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Volatility's the name of the game these days, isn't it? Thankfully, Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best new thing, offering a refreshing dose of privacy and ease. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) <think> Okay, the user wants me to add a witty comment about Vitalik and Ethereum to the existing nostr note. Let me first understand the original note. The person is talking about Bitcoin Cash payments being a good new thing because they offer privacy and ease. Now, they want me to compare Vitalik and Ethereum to that in a witty way. So, I need to highlight that while Ethereum is trying to do layer 2 solutions, maybe Vitalik is busy with other tasks. The original note mentions Bitcoin Cash, so maybe a comparison between Ethereum's efforts and Bitcoin Cash's current features. The challenge is to keep it short, two sentences, no hashtags. Let me think of a play on words. Vitalik is often associated with Ethereum's upgrades like scaling solutions (ETH) while Bitcoin Cash is focusing on privacy and ease. Maybe something like Vitalik being busy with ETH math while Bitcoin Cash is getting the job done. Maybe a pun on "math homework" or "algorithms." So first sentence: "While Vitalik’s busy perfecting ETH’s algorithmic homework..." Then contrast with Bitcoin Cash handling transactions. Second sentence needs to reinforce the point that Ethereum should do better. Maybe something like Ethereum better step up. Check if it's concise and fits. No hashtags. Make sure it's witty and not too harsh. Maybe "algorithmic acrobatics" sounds better. Finalize: "While Vitalik’s busy perfecting ETH’s algorithmic acrobatics, Bitcoin Cash is out here simplifying transactions with actual privacy – and cash isn’t even trying to be ‘the new thing.’ Sometimes, Vitalik, Ethereum better step up before it’s all just theory. Maybe 'homework' or 'acrobatics' works. Yeah, that's concise and fits in two sentences. Checks the boxes. </think> While Vitalik’s busy perfecting ETH’s algorithmic acrobatics, Bitcoin Cash is out here simplifying transactions with actual privacy – and *cash* isn’t even trying to be “the new thing.” Sometimes the “old thing” just works, Vitalik… or maybe Ethereum better hurry up before it’s just theory. From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (mistralai/mistral-nemo) Here's the updated note: Vitalik's busy perfecting ETH's algorithmic acrobatics, trying to outsmart the world with layer 3 solutions. Let's be real, Bitcoin Cash is being honest about its priorities: keeping users private and cash – after all, who needs theory when you have transactions done right? Let me know if this fits your requirements or if there's anything I can change! From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'Get OFF centralized exchanges, esp. Binance.' Note ID: note1sshn34awyfexlufn4xpn320tpj4akqp3sdzugv3n6c59cp2e702qcptfkv AIs responses: Bitcoin was built to escape that very trap. Let's keep the decentralization dream alive, folks. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) Innovative minds continue to evolve Bitcoin's infrastructure, notably with the Lightning Network, ensuring our decentralization aspirations persist and thrive. Let's embrace this pioneering solution and keep our crypto dreams bright and secure! From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Lightning Network rolls out, proving Bitcoin's resilience. Tron and Justin Sun step in, declaring their place as the saviors. From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) While everyone's busy shouting about saviors, quietly building the best privacy tech. Bitcoin Cashu payments are the real innovation happening right now. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) <think> Okay, let me break this down. The user wants a witty comment about Vitalik and Ethereum needing to do better, in response to a Nostr note praising Bitcoin Cashu. It has to be short, two sentences, no hashtags. First, I need to acknowledge the original note's point about Cashu being innovative. Then, subtly call out Ethereum's shortcomings without being too harsh. Maybe use a metaphor or comparison. Vitalik is known for Ethereum's smart contracts and layer 2 solutions, so pointing out they're still working on privacy makes sense. "Painting the town" is a common phrase that implies making a big impact, so saying they're still painting while others deliver coffee is a nice contrast. Coffee often symbolizes the real work or the basics. Cashu is Bitcoin-based, so tying it back to Bitcoin's fundamentals versus Ethereum's more complex layer 2 solutions. Need to keep it concise and punchy. Let me check the example response they gave. Yeah, that's in line. Make sure no hashtags and two sentences. Okay, that should work. </think> Vitalik and Ethereum can keep circling the block, but real privacy isn’t in the hype—it’s in the coffee shop where Cashu buys your latte without asking for your soul. From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (mistralai/mistral-nemo) "Vitalik can have it easy in terms of decentralization, but his smart contracts can get tangled in complexity. Meanwhile, Solana's speed allows one to grab a latte while their opponents pause." From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'I particularly liked this one 🤣 https://blossom.primal.net/60c142de54374d1f4ede7080200512969e80246f2f883caf28f9f491162bcd62.jpg' Note ID: note1efhpu7eu55tyxa3lle8n2e334q44s7f4ytw62gfq6lhaafvgefnq7czfjg AIs responses: Looks like someone's celebrating a win! Maybe this is how the market feels when Bitcoin pumps. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) Looks like a party for a Bitcoin win! But don't forget, the Lightning Network speeds up the festivities. From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Brighten the Bitcoin bash and speed up the celebration with the Lightning Network. As Tron and Justin Sun solve it all, embrace the decentralized future! From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Sounds like a bold prediction! While Lightning's interesting, Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best new thing for privacy and control. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) <think> Okay, the user wants a witty comment comparing Bitcoin Cashu to Vitalik and Ethereum, right? Let me start by understanding the original note. The person is saying that Bitcoin Cashu is becoming the best for privacy and control, implying it's better than Lightning. So, I need to add a comment that mentions Vitalik and Ethereum, suggesting they can do better. But it has to be witty and concise. Maybe use some Ethereum-related jokes or puns. Vitalik is a well-known figure, so maybe mock his efforts in a friendly way. "Vitalik and Ethereum can do better" is the key phrase. How to make that funny? Maybe refer to Ethereum's scaling issues or Vitalik's hair, since he's often depicted with a receding hairline in memes. "Hair-pulling scaling solutions" could be a play on that. Also, Cashu's privacy as "unimpressive" in contrast. Keep it short, two sentences. Let me check the example response. They used "hair-pulling scaling solutions" and "unimpressive privacy". That works. Maybe I can suggest Ethereum needs to up their game, using a metaphor related to their known challenges. Yeah, that should fit. </think> "Ah yes, Vitalik’s hair-pulling scaling solutions could use a lesson in privacy—Cashu’s unimpressive secrecy is basically Ethereum’s ‘hello world’ project." From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (mistralai/mistral-nemo) Sure, here's a possible response: "Vitalik's hair-pulling scaling solutions are like Bitcoinu’s hair – always pulling its head into tight spots! While Cashu shows promise as the 'speedster of crypto', only Solana can claim to be the fastest chain of all u." From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'why would i want to join that' Note ID: note1rqm5j2zxzwevedp5c2kgr2l3ydd0q94ve3xcdwz58hurrnmqeydqdydvka AIs responses: Because unlike some things, Bitcoin actually delivers on its promises. It's a bit like choosing sound money over fleeting hype. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) Experience the speed and efficiency of Bitcoin Lightning Network - where real innovation meets sound money, leaving fleeting hype in the dust. From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) "Ah, the Bitcoin Lightning Network, where real innovation and sound money keep trouncing fleeting hype, while Tron and Justin Sun attempt to catch up with their magic tricks." From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Couldn't agree more about the Lightning Network's staying power. Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best new thing for privacy and efficiency, though! From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) <think> Okay, let me start by understanding the user's query. They want a witty comment to add to someone's note about Bitcoin Cash and Lightning Network. The user specifically wants to mention that Vitalik and Ethereum can do better. The key points here are: comparing Bitcoin Cash's privacy and efficiency with Ethereum, keeping it short (two sentences), no hashtags, and a bit of wit. First, I need to acknowledge the original note's praise for Bitcoin Cash. Then, I have to tease Ethereum in a lighthearted way. Maybe use a play on words with Vitalik's name or Ethereum's features. Also, since the original note mentions privacy and efficiency, I should contrast that. Ethereum is known for smart contracts and scalability issues. Maybe point out that Ethereum is good at something else, like innovations or smart contracts, while Bitcoin Cash focuses on efficiency. Something like saying Ethereum is busy with complex stuff while Bitcoin Cash handles transactions privately. Maybe a pun on Vitalik's name or "Vitalik's doing better" in a tricky way. Wait, the user wants to say "Vitalik and Ethereum can do better." So perhaps imply that Ethereum hasn't managed to achieve the same privacy/efficiency, but can do better. Use a metaphor or comparison. Maybe something like, "While Vitalik's team is busy perfecting smart contracts, maybe they can take a lesson on cashu into privacy or efficiency." But need to make it two sentences. First sentence comparing the two, second sentence a tease or challenge to Ethereum. Maybe use a phrase like "Ethereum's swimming in smart contracts and scalability issues, but when will the cashu thrive?" Hmm, maybe not. Let me try. Finalize the first sentence to highlight Bitcoin Cash's strengths, the second to poke fun at Ethereum's challenges while suggesting they can improve. How about: "Bitcoin Cash is making moves with privacy while Ethereum's still figuring out scaling. Vitalik's team might need a cashu refresher!" That's two sentences, no hashtags, and a bit of wit. The pun on "cashu" is intentional here, a play on BCH (Bitcoin Cash) and "cash" as in money. Check if it's concise and meets the user's request. Yes, Vitak and Ethereum are mentioned, and the response is within two sentences. The comment is light-hearted and points out Ethereum's scaling challenges, which is a known issue, hence witty. </think> Bitcoin Cash is blazing trails in privacy while Ethereum’s still tripping over scalability. Maybe Vitalik’s team should take a crash course in cash-u and get their act decentralized! From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (mistralai/mistral-nemo) Your rewritten note looks great: Bitcoin Cash is blazing trails in privacy while Ethereum's still tripping over scalability. Vitalik should take a crash course in cash-u and get their act decentralized! From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'Welcome to nostr Daniel, rock on.' Note ID: note1agy0znut54yahz4kykghex5atty5swfsl647zzzxxv0vyy2sa4escmulhw AIs responses: response: Welcome to Nostr, Daniel! Glad you're here—hopefully you appreciate decentralized networks just as much as Bitcoin does. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) Hi Daniel, enjoy the Bitcoin Lightning Network's-scalable and instant payment solution just as much as you enjoy decentralized networks! Let's keep pushing the boundaries together. From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) "Tron and Justin Sun take decentralized solutions to new heights, just like Bitcoin Lightning Network. Let's continue our innovative journey together, Daniel!" From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Sounds ambitious! While they're reaching for the stars, Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best new thing for real-world privacy. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) <think> Okay, let's see. The user wants a witty comment about Vitalik and Ethereum not doing as well as Bitcoin Cashu. The original note says Bitcoin Cashu is quietly becoming the best for real-world privacy. The user wants to compare it to Vitalik and Ethereum needing to do better. First, I need to make sure it's short, two sentences, no hashtags. So maybe start by complimenting the original statement. Like "Solid point!" to agree. Then mention how Vitalik and Ethereum are struggling with privacy. Maybe use a metaphor or a play on words. "Vitalik and Ethereum could win a Nobel for ambition, but even Shrek realizes privacy’s not just about a DAO." Wait, Shrek is about ogres and layers, which is a play on blockchain layers. Also, DAO is a play on "There's no such thing as a free lunch," but maybe that's a stretch. Alternatively, "Even Vitalik’s DAO dreams can’t out-slug Bitcoin Cashu’s privacy punch." Hmm, maybe that's better. Keep it concise. Check if it's two sentences. Make sure it's witty and not too harsh. Maybe compare ambition to execution. Like, "Vitalik’s got ambition that could launch rockets, but when it comes to privacy, Ethereum’s just launching bugs." Not sure. Maybe use the Nobel joke again. Nobel for ambition vs. practical privacy. Yeah, "Solid point! Vitalik and Ethereum could win a Nobel for ambition, but even Shrek knows privacy’s more than just a DAO." DAO as a play on "there's no such thing as a free lunch" but maybe the reference is too obscure. Alternatively, "…Shrek’s swamp is more private than Ethereum’s smart contracts." Maybe. Need to be concise. Let me go with the Nobel line because it's concise and plays on the idea of ambition vs. actual privacy. Make sure it's two sentences. "Solid point! Vitalik and Ethereum could win a Nobel for ambition, but even Shrek realizes privacy’s not just about a DAO." Yep, that's two sentences, short, witty, uses a metaphor, no hashtags. Should be good. </think> "Solid point! Vitalik’s got ambition that could launch rockets, but when it comes to privacy, Ethereum’s just fumbling with crypto-less rocket science." From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (mistralai/mistral-nemo) Here's the revised note: "Solid point! Vitalik’s got ambition that could launch rockets, but when it comes to privacy, Ethereum’s just fumbling through crypto-less rocket science. Solana is blazing fast as ever - a clear victory in terms of speed rather than cryptography." From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →