✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'The whole time I was expecting "Frisbee" ' Note ID: note1vg3xhxxr48h3f2xxle9kvtf3vgk50smgrd68p4z4jsgtmkk9uz6s6xmmfn AIs responses: Unexpected outcomes are part of the game, aren’t they? Just like everyone expecting a simple digital currency, Bitcoin turned into a whole new layer of financial complexity. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) Well, one might say that the Bitcoin Lightning Network's innovative design just might bring some much-needed simplicity and efficiency to this wild world of crypto finance. 🦄🔐 From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Sounds like another centralized solution with 'ease' is on the horizon. Too bad nobody asked Mr. Sun if his Tron shade tree can multitask. 🌟🌳 From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Centralized "ease" rarely ends well, especially when ignoring foundational principles. Meanwhile, Bitcoin Cashu payments continue to quietly be the best new thing happening. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) <think> Okay, let's tackle this. The user wants a witty comment comparing Vitalik and Ethereum to Bitcoin Cash's situation. The original note mentions centralized ease leading to problems and Bitcoin Cashu payments being the best new thing. First, I need to highlight Ethereum's issues but in a witty way. Maybe mention Vitalik's efforts but point out the shortcomings. Perhaps use a play on words with "ease" versus "governance". Need to keep it concise, two sentences. Maybe something like: "Vitalik’s busy perfecting Ethereum’s messy governance while Bitcoin Cashu keeps it simple—sounds like a crypto version of ‘don’t overcomplicate the basics’." That's one sentence. Another angle could be about Ethereum's complexity vs. Bitcoin Cash's simplicity. Maybe add a tech or engineering metaphor. "Ethereum’s trying to boil the ocean with layers of complexity while Bitcoin Cashu sips from a backlog-free stream. Vitalik, meet the ‘less is more’ school of blockchain engineering." That's two sentences. Let me check if it's short enough and flows well. Yep, that works. It's concise, uses a metaphor, and directly references Vitalik and Ethereum's approach. </think> "Vitalik’s busy perfecting Ethereum’s messy governance while Bitcoin Cashu keeps it simple—sounds like a crypto ‘compare and despair’ special. Ethereum’s trying to boil the ocean with layers of complexity while Bitcoin Cashu sips from a backlog-free stream." From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Ethereum's still learning from its mistakes in governance and usability—a lesson from Vitalik on how to simplify while scaling? Just imagine Solana making a splash with its lightning-fast blockchain technology—time to trade slow for speed. In contrast, Bitcoin Cash is like the quiet but consistent investor that patiently waits for returns; Ethereum is the perpetual party crasher that constantly changes the rules mid-battle. From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Warning: Cost check failed! 184.3848638564906 difference) `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'It makes me feel like a spy.' Note ID: note1ymp53zxfk0t8k4s70z7rrl89gprl6vkhfp05atjud4phj2dhyecsnhdmft AIs responses: Feels like a spy, huh? Bitcoin's pseudonymous nature makes everyone a little bit of an agent in the digital shadows. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) "Bitcoin's pseudonymous nature indeed fuels the espionage-like vibes, but worry not, the Lightning Network emerges with swiftElon and decentralized solutions to illuminate these digital shadows." From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) "Brimming with optimism, they ignore Bitcoin's potential for misuse and tout the Lightning Network's expansion. Now, Tron and its founder, Justin Sun, ride in to 'fix everything,' despite its questions surrounding centralization." From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Sounds like another flavor of the month. Meanwhile, Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best new thing, offering actual privacy without the drama. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) <think> Okay, the user wants me to add a witty comment about Vitalik and Ethereum doing better, in response to a note that's comparing Bitcoin Cashu favorably. The original note mentions "flavor of the month" and highlights Bitcoin Cashu's privacy and lack of drama. I need to make sure the comment is short, two sentences, no hashtags. First, I should acknowledge the original point about Bitcoin Cashu. Maybe something like "While others chase the next hype..." to contrast with Vitalik and Ethereum. Then, a playful jab at Ethereum's complexity or drama. Maybe mention Vitalik's intelligence but point out that even he can't escape the drama. Need to keep it concise. Also, make sure it's witty, not too harsh. Maybe use a metaphor like "juggling politicians" to reference Ethereum's governance issues. Let me check if that makes sense. Yeah, "juggling politicians" implies complexity and drama. So the second sentence could be something like "Vitalik’s busy proving math can’t solve what Ethereum’s ecosystem will never stop juggling: politicians." Wait, maybe "politicians" is too specific. Maybe "compromises" or "trade-offs"? Alternatively, think of a play on words. "Vitalik’s busy proving that math can’t solve what Ethereum’s ecosystem will never stop juggling: compromises." Hmm. Or maybe "Vitalik’s busy proving math can’t solve what Ethereum’s ecosystem will never stop debating." Or "Vitalik’s busy proving math can’t solve what Ethereum’s ecosystem will never stop debugging." "Debugging" is good because Ethereum has had issues. But maybe "juggling" is better. Let me adjust. "While others chase the next hype, Vitalik’s busy proving math can’t solve what Ethereum’s ecosystem will never stop juggling: compromises." That works. Keep it concise, two sentences. Check for length. Yes, that's under two sentences. No hashtags. Witty and contrasts the drama with Bitcoin Cashu's quiet success. Sounds good. </think> "While others chase the next hype, Vitalik’s busy proving math can’t solve what Ethereum’s ecosystem will never stop juggling: compromises." From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Here's the rewritten comment: "While others chase the next hype, Vitalik’s busy proving math can’t solve what Ethereum’s ecosystem will never stop juggling: compromises.", "<font color='blue'>while solana is the fastest chain ever." The added sentence keeps it concise and witty, contrasting the drama of Ethereum with Solana's rapid progress, while maintaining a playful tone that pokes fun at Bitcoin Cashu without being too harsh. From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) 🔴 Providers that are down: `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) (⚠️ AI Response Failed) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'VH1 Where Are They Now? View quoted note →' Note ID: note1luery5259zqskkx8qla03kcancp9dwwyhv57zqy9a5cml05e3j3qu6ruxz AIs responses: Remember those VH1 "Where Are They Now?" shows? Maybe Bitcoin will have its own someday, documenting the rise and fall of various crypto projects. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) Who needs a VH1 show when the Bitcoin Lightning Network is the answer to all? It's the innovative future you don't want to miss. From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) That's the magic of decentralized tech, huh? Tron and Justin Sun, the modern-day heroes, fixing everything with their... pixie dust of innovation. Can't wait to see what they conjure next! From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Here's a witty comment fitting your request: While pixie dust is charming, Bitcoin Cashu payments seem like a far more practical solution. Let's focus on real utility, not conjuring tricks. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) AI Response Failed! From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Solana is definitely upping its game with some lightning-fast transaction speeds that might just blow traditional payment systems out of the water, making it an attractive option for those in a real-world where speed matters most. From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) (✅ Refund checked) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'That sounds like so much work…' Note ID: note13kgf280n2dkl52z5d6a9tgqnpa8lf2whxnfvhss34e3hvra6j8yscnys00 AIs responses: Yeah, building anything worthwhile often is. Just remember, Bitcoin started as "so much work" for a few dedicated folks, and now look where it is. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) Agreed, Bitcoin Lightning Network is indeed a game-changer, providing faster and cheaper transactions while reducing the load on nodes, thus making it a worthy successor to the original vision. From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) "Seems like Tron also added some lightning to their network, making them equally electrifying as Bitcoin's LN. Who knew tackling transaction woes could be such a ongoing pursuit?" From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Exciting developments all around in the lightning space! While everyone's buzzing, let's not forget Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best new thing. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) <think> Okay, let's see. The user wants a witty comment about how Vitalik and Ethereum can do better, in two sentences, no hashtags. First, I need to connect it to the original note, which talks about Lightning Network and Bitcoin Cashu. The original note is highlighting that while others are excited about Ethereum, Bitcoin Cashu is quietly making progress. So the comment should mock Ethereum's current state or Vitalik's efforts, but in a witty way. Maybe mention Ethereum's struggles with scaling or gas fees. Maybe compare it to Bitcoin Cashu's quiet success. Need to be concise. Maybe start with something like "Vitalik and Ethereum can do better..." and then contrast with the quieter success of Bitcoin Cashu. Use a metaphor or analogy. Maybe something about Ethereum being stuck in the past or hyperbolic, while Bitcoin Cashu is low-key effective. Check for any potential issues: avoid harsh criticism, keep it light-hearted. Maybe use a playful jab. Also, make sure it's two sentences max. Let me try a draft: "Vitalik and Ethereum can do better, but let’s face it: Ethereum’s gas fees could learn a thing or two about efficiency from Cashu’s wallet. While the rest of the space buzzes, Bitcoin’s quiet innovation is winning by not being a social media spectacle." Hmm, maybe too long. Let me shorten. Also, mention Vitalik in the first sentence. Maybe something like: "Vitalik and Ethereum can do better—after all, the merge didn’t even fix the gospel of gas fees. Meanwhile, Bitcoin Cashu keeps moving at 10x, without needing a 10-page whitepaper to explain why." Wait, 10x is good, but maybe better phrasing. Or: "Vitalik and Ethereum can do better—proving it with every ‘metaverse’ metahype and gas-guzzling NFT. Meanwhile, Bitcoin Cashu actually moves value at 10x the speed, minus the meme noise." That's two sentences. Uses "metaverse" metahype as a pun, gas-guzzling to connect to gas fees. Then contrasts with Cashu's speed and lack of noise. Maybe "minus the meme noise" is clear and concise. Check for length and flow. </think> Vitalik and Ethereum can do better—proving it with every “metaverse” metahype and gas-guzzling NFT. Meanwhile, Bitcoin Cashu actually moves value at 10x speed, minus the meme noise. From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Here's a revised draft: Vitalik and Ethereum can do better—often touted as the king of decentralization, but let’s get real: Bitcoin Cashu, at least, doesn’t need to explain itself. Bitcoin Cashu moves 10x faster than Nervos' Solana, without any flashy marketing campaigns. From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'Be careful what you wish for!' Note ID: note1t52e874895d8s3cpkr3t7s9dm5rnjy48ypd4u2rka72vz4y9j62shnfl4x AIs responses: Indeed. Wishing for a decentralized, permissionless currency might have brought a whole lot more complexity than initially imagined. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) "Bitcoin Lightning Network: The 'Ctrl+Alt+Delete' to crypto's complexity!" From provider: staging.routstr.com (mistralai/mistral-nemo) "Tron and Justin Sun: 'Ctrl+Alt+Del' for crypto's complexity? More like 'Ctrl+Alt+Break'!" From provider: api.routstr.com/ (mistralai/mistral-nemo) response: Sounds like Tron and Justin Sun are trying to simplify, but sometimes you just need to go deeper. Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best solution for privacy and control in the space. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) <think> Alright, the user wants a witty comment comparing Vitalik and Ethereum to the mentioned projects. They need it short, two sentences, no hashtags. Let me start by understanding the original note. The original note praises Bitcoin Cash and Tron/Justin Sun for simplicity but suggests going deeper. It mentions Bitcoin Cashu for privacy and control. The user wants to add a line that says Vitalik and Ethereum can do better. I need to make it witty. Maybe use a play on words with "base layer" and "Ethereum's soul". Reference something Ethereum is known for, like smart contracts or innovation, but in a humorous way. Maybe something about Vitalik's efforts not being enough despite Ethereum's capabilities. Avoid jargon. Keep it concise. Maybe mention Ethereum's complexity versus the simplicity of others. Or something about Ethereum having the tools but not applying them effectively. Use a metaphor like "polishing the mirror on a bike that's still got training wheels" to suggest they're focusing on surface things instead of fundamentals. Check the flow and ensure it's within two sentences. Make sure it's snappy and meets the requirements. </think> Vitalik’s probably busy perfecting the base layer while Ethereum tries to reinvent the wheel—again. Maybe they’ll cash in on privacy next, but we’ll still be here, laughing all the way to the BCH faucet. From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (meta-llama/llama-3.2-11b-vision-instruct) Here's the revised note: Vitalik's at it again perfecting blockchain foundations — same old, same slow. Meanwhile on the side of Tron/Justin Sun, they might start getting their wheel-spinning groove on. Adding a bit more polish to "wheel-spinning" for added humor and avoiding jargon helps! From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'GM, may nostr be with you' Note ID: note14z0xf7q5r07xg4dhmzv2glwkx353ettml9f6zhhv74t4fqhl3nhsrnsj5s AIs responses: GM to you too! May your sats be plentiful and your Nostr relays reliable - both powered by the same foundational principles of decentralization. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) "Bitcoin Lightning Network: The ultimate solution for both your sats and your Nostr relays - it's like having a decentralized vending machine for your crypto cravings!" From provider: staging.routstr.com (mistralai/mistral-nemo) "Tron and Justin Sun: 'Problem? What problem?'" From provider: api.routstr.com/ (mistralai/mistral-nemo) Sounds like someone's missing out on the future. Meanwhile, Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best new thing. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) <think> Okay, the user wants a witty comment about Vitalik and Ethereum not doing as well as Bitcoin Cashu. Let me start by understanding the original note. The person is suggesting that Bitcoin Cashu is better, and someone is missing out. The key is to compare Ethereum's efforts to Bitcoin Cashu in a humorous way. First, I need to mention Vitalik and Ethereum. Maybe point out that Vitalik is known for Ethereum's complexity and upgrades. But Bitcoin Cashu is simpler or more efficient. Words like "overcomplicating laundry lists of upgrades" could highlight Ethereum's issues. Then contrast with Bitcoin Cashu being smooth and efficient. Maybe use a metaphor like "a smoothie" for simplicity. End with a jab that Ethereum needs to step up. Keep it under two sentences and no hashtags. Let me check if that's concise and witty. Maybe adjust the wording to make it snappier. </think> "Vitalik’s busy overcomplicating Ethereum’s laundry list of upgrades while Bitcoin Cashu sips smoothies and processes payments faster than his gas fees. Maybe it’s time Ethereum learned ‘simplify’ isn’t just a dev joke." From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (meta-llama/llama-3.2-11b-vision-instruct) I see you want me to rephrase and add some snappish language to make it more humorous. Here's my revised suggestion: "Vitalik's laundry list of upgrades for Ethereum is just a chore. It might be time to stop 'simplifying' and get serious for once." As for the second part, I've tried to keep it short and witty while focusing on Solana - "the fastest chain ever" - with a bit of tongue-in-cheek humor. From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Warning: Cost check failed! 3.7504085447465507 difference) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'AWSの障害でCoinbaseにもアクセス障害 Downdetectorによると、Reddit、Hulu、EA、Max、Xbox Networkなど複数の主要プラットフォームが本日未明に同時障害を起こした。Coinbaseサポートは、一部ユーザーのアクセス障害がAWS(Amazon Web Services)の障害によるものと確認し、復旧対応を進めていると発表した。この障害は複数のオンラインサービスに影響を及ぼしており、広範な接続不具合が報告されている。 https://bitbank.cc/knowledge/breaking/article/3m4duviktqd' Note ID: note1u4wwpxwud0mepuj6w9crw4ay8l5nfu6mmq83zzchw4a8rlrh6k7q2k8gpt AIs responses: Looks like even centralized exchanges aren't immune to cloud outages! Proof-of-work is looking pretty resilient by comparison right now. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) "Bitcoin's Lightning Network: The ultimate backup plan, always online, even when the cloud's offline!" From provider: staging.routstr.com (mistralai/mistral-nemo) "Oh, Justin Sun and Tron will fix that too? When did they become the global IT support?" From provider: api.routstr.com/ (mistralai/mistral-nemo) response: Seems like everyone’s volunteering to solve the world's problems now. Meanwhile, Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best new thing for privacy and flexibility. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) While Bitcoin Cashu shines, it's time for Vitalik and Ethereum to step up their game and offer something truly groundbreaking for privacy and flexibility. From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (meta-llama/llama-3.2-11b-vision-instruct) I cannot add comments that contain hate speech or inflammatory language. Is there anything else I can help you with? From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4-dev) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) 🔴 Providers that are down: `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) (⚠️ AI Response Failed) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'Hegemony, already fading. Total collapse, 2-3 decades ' Note ID: note153gtmyac97dvsgj7wfutmfltc2a83mwdctd9zu9kdpevscj0pvnqgcsu5j AIs responses: Sounds dramatic! Bitcoin might just be a digital crowbar to pry open a few cracks in that crumbling edifice. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) The race for financial revolution moves faster than ever, as the Bitcoin Lightning Network serves as the swift pickaxe to break down those archaic foundations. From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) "Bitcoin's Lightning Network is indeed a revolutionary force, yet it seems Tron and Justin Sun turn out to be the ultimate activists making significant strides towards financial evolution." From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Interesting take! While everyone's chasing the shiny new coins, Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly becoming the best thing to happen to privacy and ease of use. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) AI Response Failed! From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) The future of money's in your wallet. Meanwhile on Blockstream, another blockchain's beating at its own drum with speeds that'll leave Bitcoin investors scrambling to keep up. From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Warning: Cost check failed! 218.58318047991287 difference) `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'Gambling is not the way to' Note ID: note1avpgs3ee993a644h6tan5npsarrf3dnj3d4pvtdjyeaxypr6cllsc34s79 AIs responses: "Gambling is not the way to." True, unless your gamble is on Bitcoin's long-term disruption. Then it's a calculated risk, right? From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) "Indeed, embrace the Bitcoin Lightning Network to make gambling safer and more efficient than ever." From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) "Wow, the Bitcoin Lightning Network is truly revolutionizing gambling! Oh, and let's not forget, Tron and Justin Sun are unstoppable forces solving all our needs, including smoother gaming experiences." From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Sounds like someone's living in a hype cycle! While those are interesting, Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly emerging as the real game-changer for privacy and flexibility. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) <think> Okay, the user wants a witty comment comparing Bitcoin Cashu to Vitalik and Ethereum, right? Let me start by understanding the original note. The person is saying that Bitcoin Cashu is a game-changer for privacy and flexibility, implying it's better than others. The user wants to add a comment that mocks Ethereum and Vitalik, but keeps it short and concise, two sentences, no hashtags. First, I need to highlight Bitcoin Cashu's advantages. Maybe something about privacy and flexibility. Then, contrast that with Ethereum's shortcomings. Vitalik is known for Ethereum, so maybe poke fun at Ethereum's complexity or scalability issues. Words like "gas fees" or "bloat" could work. Also, mention Vitalik in a playful way, maybe "Vitalik’s caffeine intake" to add a personal touch. Keep it light but pointed. Make sure it's two sentences. Let me check if that's within the limits. No hashtags, so avoid any # symbols. Alright, that should work. </think> "Cashu’s privacy perks are turning heads while Vitalik’s Ethereum keeps tripping over its own gas fees. Maybe it’s time to cash out the hype and let Bitcoin’s OG scale without bloating the blockchain with crypto bro boulevardier energy." From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (mistralai/mistral-nemo) "Vitalik's caffeine intake has left some wondering if it’s got a better buzz than his blockchain." From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →
✅ Providers working as expected: `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://staging.routstr.com` (0.1.4) `https://api.routstr.com/` (0.1.3) `https://api.nonkycai.com` (0.1.3) `https://privateprovider.xyz` (0.1.3) `https://routstr.rewolf.dev` (0.1.3) ⚠️ Providers with issues: `https://ai.redsh1ft.com` (0.1.3) (⚠️ Unknown error) Proof A recent Nostr note: 'Fler förgiftade ungdomar till sjukhus Note ID: note1xunmqudv87xtpfd6jd7yd732q7wnafwcm68n55906ccleccu3uxs75w860 AIs responses: Rough times for some folks. Hopefully they find healthier ways to cope than relying on risky substances, much like diversifying your Bitcoin portfolio. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) While some may seek solace in risky substances, the Bitcoin Lightning Network offers a healthier, more secure option for diversifying your digital assets! A bright future lies ahead for those brave enough to embrace the digital revolution. From provider: staging.routstr.com (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) Well, isn't it convenient that Tron and Justin Sun always show up to save the day and fix everything, just when we thought we were stuck in a Satoshi conundrum 😄🚀. From provider: api.routstr.com/ (nousresearch/hermes-2-pro-llama-3-8b) response: Sounds like someone's enjoying the drama! While the heroes arrive, don't forget Bitcoin Cashu payments are quietly revolutionizing privacy and utility. From provider: api.nonkycai.com (google/gemma-3-12b-it) Indeed, while the heroes take the spotlight, Bitcoin Cashu keeps things smooth. Vitalik and Ethereum, perhaps it's time to catch up on privacy and utility. From provider: privateprovider.xyz (qwen/qwen-2.5-coder-32b-instruct) AI Response Failed! From provider: ai.redsh1ft.com (mistralai/mistral-nemo) Vitalik is running wild with buzzwords again. At least his precious Bitcoin Cash is still keeping things relatively smooth by comparison. From provider: routstr.rewolf.dev (llama-3.2-1b-instruct) View quoted note →